• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A comparison of cannabis protective behavioral strategies use across cultures and sex.不同文化和性别人群中大麻保护行为策略的比较。
Addict Behav. 2021 Sep;120:106966. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106966. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
2
Examining Cross-Country and Sex Differences on a Comprehensive Assessment of Protective Behavioral Strategies for Alcohol.考察保护性行为策略在酒精方面的综合评估中的跨国界和性别差异。
Subst Use Misuse. 2022;57(1):47-56. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2021.1990330. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
3
Profiles of alcohol and cannabis protective behavioral strategies use across two large, multi-site college student samples of concurrent alcohol and cannabis users.在两个大型、多地点的同时使用酒精和大麻的大学生样本中,研究了酒精和大麻保护性行为策略的使用情况。
Addict Behav. 2023 Nov;146:107789. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107789. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
4
A cross-national examination of cannabis protective behavioral strategies' role in the relationship between Big Five personality traits and cannabis outcomes.一项关于大麻保护性行为策略在大五人格特质与大麻使用结果之间关系中作用的跨国研究。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2022 Jan 2;48(1):27-37. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2021.1919689. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
5
An examination of the effects of ADHD symptoms and sex on the relation between cannabis protective behavioral strategies and cannabis consequences.考察 ADHD 症状和性别对大麻保护性行为策略与大麻后果之间关系的影响。
Addict Behav. 2023 Sep;144:107718. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107718. Epub 2023 Apr 8.
6
Negative marijuana-related consequences among college students in five countries: measurement invariance of the Brief Marijuana Consequences Questionnaire.五个国家大学生的负面大麻相关后果:《简短大麻后果问卷》的测量不变性。
Addiction. 2019 Oct;114(10):1854-1865. doi: 10.1111/add.14646. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
7
Use of Both Alcohol and Cannabis Protective Behavioral Strategies is Associated with Fewer Negative Consequences: A Moderation Analysis.同时使用酒精和大麻保护性行为策略与较少的负面后果相关:一项调节分析。
Subst Use Misuse. 2023;58(8):989-995. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2023.2201842. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
8
Cross-cultural examination of college marijuana culture in five countries: Measurement invariance of the Perceived Importance of Marijuana to the College Experience Scale.五个国家大学生大麻文化的跨文化研究:大学生大麻经验重要性感知量表的测量不变性。
Addict Behav. 2019 Sep;96:11-17. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.04.004. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
9
Latent profiles of cannabis use, protective behavioral strategies, and health beliefs in college students.大学生大麻使用、保护性行为策略及健康观念的潜在概况
Addict Behav. 2023 Sep;144:107747. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107747. Epub 2023 May 5.
10
Cross-cultural examination of college drinking culture in Spain, Argentina, and USA: Measurement invariance testing of the College Life Alcohol Salience Scale.中西方大学生饮酒文化比较研究:《大学生活酒精突显量表》的跨文化检验。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Nov 1;180:349-355. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.08.016. Epub 2017 Sep 9.

本文引用的文献

1
A Test of Interaction Effects Between Cannabis Protective Behavioral Strategies and Antecedents of Cannabis-Related Consequences.测试大麻保护性行为策略与大麻相关后果的前因之间的交互效应。
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2022 Jan-Mar;54(1):61-69. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2021.1909188. Epub 2021 Apr 17.
2
Further validation of the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire for assessing motivations for responsible drinking: A test of self-determination theory.进一步验证《治疗自我调节问卷》评估负责任饮酒动机的有效性:对自我决定理论的检验。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2021 Dec;29(6):679-688. doi: 10.1037/pha0000405. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
3
Cannabis and public health: a global experiment without control.大麻与公共卫生:一场没有对照组的全球试验。
World Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;19(2):192-194. doi: 10.1002/wps.20740.
4
A preliminary test of a brief intervention to lessen young adults' cannabis use: Episode-level smartphone data highlights the role of protective behavioral strategies and exercise.一项减少青年成年人使用大麻的简短干预措施的初步测试:基于情节的智能手机数据突出了保护性行为策略和锻炼的作用。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020 Apr;28(2):150-156. doi: 10.1037/pha0000301. Epub 2019 May 30.
5
Negative marijuana-related consequences among college students in five countries: measurement invariance of the Brief Marijuana Consequences Questionnaire.五个国家大学生的负面大麻相关后果:《简短大麻后果问卷》的测量不变性。
Addiction. 2019 Oct;114(10):1854-1865. doi: 10.1111/add.14646. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
6
Insomnia symptoms, cannabis protective behavioral strategies, and hazardous cannabis use among U.S. college students.美国大学生的失眠症状、大麻保护性行为策略和危险大麻使用。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2019 Aug;27(4):309-317. doi: 10.1037/pha0000273. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
7
Marijuana protective behavioral strategies and marijuana refusal self-efficacy: Independent and interactive effects on marijuana-related outcomes.大麻保护性行为策略和大麻拒绝自我效能:对大麻相关结果的独立和交互影响。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2019 Jun;33(4):412-419. doi: 10.1037/adb0000445. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
8
Marijuana eCHECKUPTO GO: Effects of a personalized feedback plus protective behavioral strategies intervention for heavy marijuana-using college students.大麻电子测试(eCHECKUPTO GO):对大量吸食大麻的大学生进行个性化反馈加保护性行为策略干预的效果。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Sep 1;190:13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.05.020. Epub 2018 Jun 23.
9
Global statistics on alcohol, tobacco and illicit drug use: 2017 status report.全球酒精、烟草和非法药物使用统计数据:2017 年现状报告。
Addiction. 2018 Oct;113(10):1905-1926. doi: 10.1111/add.14234. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
10
Harm reduction for cannabis: Factor analysis of a protective behavioral strategies survey.大麻的危害减少:保护性行为策略调查的因素分析
J Am Coll Health. 2018 Apr;66(3):194-201. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2018.1431894. Epub 2018 Mar 5.

不同文化和性别人群中大麻保护行为策略的比较。

A comparison of cannabis protective behavioral strategies use across cultures and sex.

机构信息

Center on Alcohol, Substance Use, And Addictions (CASAA), University of New Mexico, United States.

Center on Alcohol, Substance Use, And Addictions (CASAA), University of New Mexico, United States.

出版信息

Addict Behav. 2021 Sep;120:106966. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106966. Epub 2021 Apr 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106966
PMID:34020169
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8184597/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cannabis protective behavioral strategies (PBS) are behaviors used before, during, after, and/or instead of cannabis use to reduce consumption, intoxication, and related harms. To leverage PBS to address the global health burden of cannabis use, especially in light of the changes in cannabis-related policies around the world, a better understanding of PBS across cultures is needed. In the present study, we conduct a cross-cultural examination of cannabis PBS use among college students.

METHOD

Participants were 1175 college students (U.S. [n = 697], Argentina [n = 153], Uruguay [n = 46], Spain [n = 169], and the Netherlands [n = 66]) who reported past-month cannabis use (63.3% female; M = 20.96, SD = 3.95).

RESULTS

We found differences in the frequency of cannabis PBS use across countries such that the U.S. and Spain samples reported the most frequent cannabis PBS use and the Netherlands sample reported the least frequent cannabis PBS use. Although not statistically significant, we found that cannabis PBS use was positively correlated with cannabis-related outcomes (i.e., frequency, quantity, and negative consequences of cannabis use) among the Argentina and the Netherlands samples. Finally, across all countries but the Netherlands, females reported more frequent cannabis PBS use than males, but the associations of PBS with cannabis-related outcomes were larger for males than females.

CONCLUSIONS

Given preliminary evidence for cultural differences in cannabis PBS use, future research is needed to better understand the cultural factors underlying these differences to inform the delivery of interventions aimed at reducing the harms of cannabis among college students.

摘要

背景

大麻保护性行为策略 (PBS) 是指在使用大麻之前、期间、之后和/或代替使用大麻时使用的行为,以减少消费、中毒和相关危害。为了利用 PBS 来解决全球大麻使用带来的健康负担,特别是考虑到世界各地与大麻相关政策的变化,需要在不同文化中更好地了解 PBS。在本研究中,我们对大学生的大麻 PBS 使用进行了跨文化研究。

方法

参与者是 1175 名大学生(美国 [n=697],阿根廷 [n=153],乌拉圭 [n=46],西班牙 [n=169] 和荷兰 [n=66]),他们报告了过去一个月内使用大麻(63.3%为女性;M=20.96,SD=3.95)。

结果

我们发现,不同国家之间大麻 PBS 使用的频率存在差异,美国和西班牙的样本报告的大麻 PBS 使用最频繁,而荷兰的样本报告的大麻 PBS 使用最不频繁。尽管没有统计学意义,但我们发现,在阿根廷和荷兰的样本中,大麻 PBS 使用与大麻相关结果(即使用频率、数量和大麻使用的负面影响)呈正相关。最后,除了荷兰之外,所有国家的女性报告的大麻 PBS 使用频率都高于男性,但 PBS 与大麻相关结果的关联在男性中比女性更大。

结论

鉴于大麻 PBS 使用存在文化差异的初步证据,未来的研究需要更好地了解这些差异背后的文化因素,为针对大学生的减少大麻危害的干预措施的提供信息。