• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用支持向量机预测伴发颈脊髓病后路减压融合术后发生 C5 神经根麻痹的风险:一项对 184 例连续患者的分析。

Prediction of the risk of C5 palsy after posterior laminectomy and fusion with cervical myelopathy using a support vector machine: an analysis of 184 consecutive patients.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Second Hospital of Jilin University, 218 Ziqiang Street, Changchun, Jilin, People's Republic of China.

School of Microelectronics, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 May 21;16(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02476-5.

DOI:10.1186/s13018-021-02476-5
PMID:34020677
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8139086/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to predict C5 palsy (C5P) after posterior laminectomy and fusion (PLF) with cervical myelopathy (CM) from routinely available variables using a support vector machine (SVM) method.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective investigation based on 184 consecutive patients with CM after PLF, and data were collected from March 2013 to December 2019. Clinical and imaging variables were obtained and imported into univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify risk factors for C5P. According to published reports and clinical experience, a series of variables was selected to develop an SVM machine learning model to predict C5P. The accuracy (ACC), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and confusion matrices were used to evaluate the performance of the prediction model.

RESULTS

Among the 184 consecutive patients, C5P occurred in 26 patients (14.13%). Multivariate analyses demonstrated the following 4 independent factors associated with C5P: abnormal electromyogram (odds ratio [OR] = 7.861), JOA recovery rate (OR = 1.412), modified Pavlov ratio (OR = 0.009), and presence of C4-C5 foraminal stenosis (OR = 15.492). The SVM model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.923 and an ACC of 0.918. Additionally, the confusion matrix showed the classification results of the discriminant analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The designed SVM model presented satisfactory performance in predicting C5P from routinely available variables. However, future external validation is needed.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在使用支持向量机(SVM)方法,通过常规变量预测伴有颈椎病的后路椎板切除融合术后发生 C5 神经麻痹(C5P)的风险。

方法

我们对 184 例后路椎板切除融合术后伴有颈椎病的连续患者进行了回顾性研究,数据收集时间为 2013 年 3 月至 2019 年 12 月。获取了临床和影像学变量,并将其导入单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析中,以确定 C5P 的危险因素。根据已发表的报告和临床经验,选择了一系列变量来开发 SVM 机器学习模型,以预测 C5P。采用准确性(ACC)、受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)和混淆矩阵来评估预测模型的性能。

结果

在 184 例连续患者中,有 26 例(14.13%)发生 C5P。多变量分析表明,以下 4 个独立因素与 C5P 相关:肌电图异常(比值比 [OR] = 7.861)、JOA 恢复率(OR = 1.412)、改良 Pavlov 比值(OR = 0.009)和 C4-C5 椎间孔狭窄(OR = 15.492)。SVM 模型的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.923,准确性(ACC)为 0.918。此外,混淆矩阵显示了判别分析的分类结果。

结论

所设计的 SVM 模型在预测伴有颈椎病的后路椎板切除融合术后发生 C5P 方面表现出了令人满意的性能,但需要进一步进行外部验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e0a/8139086/702dc4ea9c11/13018_2021_2476_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e0a/8139086/b15111045d7f/13018_2021_2476_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e0a/8139086/702dc4ea9c11/13018_2021_2476_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e0a/8139086/b15111045d7f/13018_2021_2476_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e0a/8139086/702dc4ea9c11/13018_2021_2476_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Prediction of the risk of C5 palsy after posterior laminectomy and fusion with cervical myelopathy using a support vector machine: an analysis of 184 consecutive patients.应用支持向量机预测伴发颈脊髓病后路减压融合术后发生 C5 神经根麻痹的风险:一项对 184 例连续患者的分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 May 21;16(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02476-5.
2
Outcomes and Related Factors of C5 Palsy Following Cervical Laminectomy With Instrumented Fusion Compared With Laminoplasty.与椎板成形术相比,颈椎后路椎板切除并器械融合术后C5麻痹的结局及相关因素
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 May;41(10):E574-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001343.
3
Preoperative Risk Factors of C5 Nerve Root Palsy After Laminectomy and Fusion in Patients With Cervical Myelopathy: Analysis of 70 Consecutive Patients.脊髓型颈椎病患者行椎板切除融合术后C5神经根麻痹的术前危险因素:70例连续病例分析
Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Nov;30(9):419-424. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000505.
4
Postoperative C5 Palsy Following Cervical Laminectomy With Instrumented Fusion Versus Cervical Laminoplasty With Reconstruction: Single Surgeon and National Inpatient Cohort Analyses.颈椎板切除术伴内固定融合术后与颈椎板成形术伴重建术后 C5 神经麻痹:单外科医生和全国住院患者队列分析。
Clin Spine Surg. 2022 May 1;35(4):181-186. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001311. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
5
Spinal cord float back is not an independent predictor of postoperative C5 palsy in patients undergoing posterior cervical decompression.脊髓复位不良不是后路颈椎减压术后 C5 瘫痪的独立预测因素。
Spine J. 2020 Feb;20(2):266-275. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.09.017. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
6
Prophylactic perioperative dexamethasone decreases the incidence of postoperative C5 palsies after a posterior cervical laminectomy and fusion.预防性围手术期地塞米松可降低后路颈椎板切除术和融合术后 C5 神经麻痹的发生率。
Spine J. 2019 Feb;19(2):253-260. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.05.031. Epub 2018 May 22.
7
Predicting C5 palsy via the use of preoperative anatomic measurements.通过术前解剖学测量预测C5麻痹。
Spine J. 2014 Sep 1;14(9):1895-901. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.10.038. Epub 2013 Nov 10.
8
Insufficient Recovery From C5 Palsy Following Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion.颈椎前路减压融合术后 C5 瘫痪恢复不足。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 Mar 1;47(5):423-429. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004225.
9
A Risk Calculator for the Prediction of C5 Nerve Root Palsy After Instrumented Cervical Fusion.用于预测颈椎后路融合术后 C5 神经根麻痹的风险计算器。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Oct;166:e703-e710. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.07.082. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
10
The role of iatrogenic foraminal stenosis from lordotic correction in the development of C5 palsy after posterior laminectomy and fusion.脊柱前凸矫正引起的医源性椎间孔狭窄在后路椎板切除融合术后C5麻痹发生过程中的作用。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2015 Oct 6;10:160. doi: 10.1186/s13018-015-0297-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Using machine learning algorithms to predict risk factors of heart failure after complete mesocolic excision in colorectal cancer patients.使用机器学习算法预测结直肠癌患者完整结肠系膜切除术后心力衰竭的危险因素。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 15;15(1):25441. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11726-z.
2
Leveraging small-sample machine learning for rigorous prediction of JOA recovery in cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients: insights from imaging parameters and modeling strategies.利用小样本机器学习对脊髓型颈椎病患者的日本骨科学会(JOA)恢复情况进行严格预测:来自影像学参数和建模策略的见解
Eur Spine J. 2025 Mar 7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08763-7.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Self-Paced Dynamic Infinite Mixture Model for Fatigue Evaluation of Pilots' Brains.用于飞行员大脑疲劳评估的自定进度动态无限混合模型
IEEE Trans Cybern. 2022 Jul;52(7):5623-5638. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2020.3033005. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
2
Nonparametric Bayesian Prior Inducing Deep Network for Automatic Detection of Cognitive Status.非参数贝叶斯先验诱导深度网络用于认知状态的自动检测。
IEEE Trans Cybern. 2021 Nov;51(11):5483-5496. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2020.2977267. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
3
Post-operative nerve injuries after cervical spine surgery.
Limitations in Evaluating Machine Learning Models for Imbalanced Binary Outcome Classification in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review.
脊柱手术中评估用于不平衡二元结局分类的机器学习模型的局限性:一项系统综述
Brain Sci. 2023 Dec 16;13(12):1723. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13121723.
4
The use of machine learning for predicting candidates for outpatient spine surgery: a review.使用机器学习预测门诊脊柱手术候选人:一项综述。
J Spine Surg. 2023 Sep 22;9(3):323-330. doi: 10.21037/jss-22-121. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
5
A degradome-based prognostic signature that correlates with immune infiltration and tumor mutation burden in breast cancer.基于降解组的预后标志物与乳腺癌免疫浸润和肿瘤突变负荷相关。
Front Immunol. 2023 Mar 13;14:1140993. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1140993. eCollection 2023.
6
A nomogram model for predicting ocular GVHD following allo-HSCT based on risk factors.基于风险因素的异基因 HSCT 后预测眼部 GVHD 的列线图模型。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2023 Jan 23;23(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02745-9.
7
Comparison of the effectiveness of different machine learning algorithms in predicting new fractures after PKP for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.比较不同机器学习算法在预测骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折 PKP 后新发骨折中的有效性。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jan 23;18(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03551-9.
8
Synergistic value of fractional flow reserve and low‑density non‑calcified plaque based on coronary computed tomography angiography for the identification of lesion‑specific ischemia.基于冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术的血流储备分数与低密度非钙化斑块对病变特异性缺血识别的协同价值
Exp Ther Med. 2022 Sep 29;24(5):701. doi: 10.3892/etm.2022.11637. eCollection 2022 Nov.
9
A tool for predicting overall survival in patients with Ewing sarcoma: a multicenter retrospective study.用于预测尤文肉瘤患者总生存的工具:一项多中心回顾性研究。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Aug 23;22(1):914. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09796-7.
10
An External-Validated Prediction Model to Predict Lung Metastasis among Osteosarcoma: A Multicenter Analysis Based on Machine Learning.基于机器学习的骨肉瘤肺转移的外部验证预测模型:多中心分析。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 May 6;2022:2220527. doi: 10.1155/2022/2220527. eCollection 2022.
颈椎手术后的术后神经损伤。
Int Orthop. 2019 Apr;43(4):791-795. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4257-4. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
4
C5 Motor Palsy After Single- and Multi-level Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion: A Retrospective Review.颈椎前路单节段和多节段间盘切除融合术后 C5 运动神经麻痹:回顾性研究。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019 Apr 15;27(8):e390-e394. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00764.
5
Factors associated with postoperative C5 palsy after expansive open-door laminoplasty: retrospective cohort study using multivariable analysis.扩大开门椎板成形术后C5麻痹的相关因素:使用多变量分析的回顾性队列研究
Eur Spine J. 2017 Sep;26(9):2410-2416. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5223-3. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
6
Preoperative Risk Factors of C5 Nerve Root Palsy After Laminectomy and Fusion in Patients With Cervical Myelopathy: Analysis of 70 Consecutive Patients.脊髓型颈椎病患者行椎板切除融合术后C5神经根麻痹的术前危险因素:70例连续病例分析
Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Nov;30(9):419-424. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000505.
7
Clinical analysis of C5 palsy after cervical decompression surgery: relationship between recovery duration and clinical and radiological factors.颈椎减压术后C5麻痹的临床分析:恢复持续时间与临床及影像学因素的关系
Eur Spine J. 2017 Apr;26(4):1101-1110. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4664-4. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
8
C5 nerve root palsy following decompression of cervical spine with anterior versus posterior types of procedures in patients with cervical myelopathy.颈椎脊髓病患者行颈椎前路与后路减压手术后C5神经根麻痹情况
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jul;25(7):2050-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4567-4. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
9
C5 nerve palsy after posterior reconstruction surgery: predictive risk factors of the incidence and critical range of correction for kyphosis.后路重建手术后的C5神经麻痹:驼背发生率的预测风险因素及矫正的关键范围
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jul;25(7):2060-7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4548-7. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
10
The Correlation Study of C5 Nerve Root Palsy and Common Body Position in Posterior Total Laminectomy Decompression and Instrumentation.后路全椎板切除减压内固定术中C5神经根麻痹与常见体位的相关性研究
Turk Neurosurg. 2016;26(2):280-5. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.7476-12.1.