• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在线手部手术患者教育材料的可读性:评估自2008年以来的趋势

Readability of Online Hand Surgery Patient Educational Materials: Evaluating the Trend Since 2008.

作者信息

Zhang Dafang, Earp Brandon E, Kilgallen Elliott E, Blazar Philip

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Am. 2022 Feb;47(2):186.e1-186.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.03.025. Epub 2021 May 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.03.025
PMID:34023192
Abstract

PURPOSE

Online patient educational materials have historically been written at a higher-than-recommended sixth grade reading level. The objectives of this study were to assess the readability of online hand surgery patient educational materials from the official online patient resource website of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH) and to compare changes in the readability of the current ASSH online patient educational materials with those in 2008 and 2015.

METHODS

An internet-based study of all 88 English language patient educational materials on HandCare.org, the official online patient resource website of the ASSH, was performed. The readability of each article was assessed using the Flesch reading ease formula, Flesch-Kincaid grade level, Coleman-Liau index, Gunning-Fog index, and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook grade level. To evaluate the trend in the readability of ASSH online hand surgery patient educational materials, the Flesch-Kincaid grade levels of articles published in 2020 were compared with those of data published in 2008 and 2015.

RESULTS

The average Flesch reading ease score of the patient educational materials was 57.6, which is at the high-school reading level. The average reading grade level of patient educational materials ranged from 9.0 to 12.3 depending on the readability metric used. The average Flesch-Kincaid grade level of all the ASSH patient educational materials was 9.8 in 2020, which is significantly better than 10.4 in 2008 but significantly worse than 8.5 in 2015.

CONCLUSIONS

Online hand surgery patient educational materials continue to be written for the general public at a higher-than-recommended reading grade level. There has been no substantial improvement in the readability of online hand surgery patient educational materials since 2008.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Improvements are needed in the readability of online patient educational materials to ensure that patients with all health literacy levels are able to comprehend and benefit from health information.

摘要

目的

在线患者教育材料历来都是以高于推荐的六年级阅读水平编写的。本研究的目的是评估美国手外科协会(ASSH)官方在线患者资源网站上的在线手外科患者教育材料的可读性,并比较当前ASSH在线患者教育材料与2008年和2015年材料可读性的变化。

方法

对ASSH官方在线患者资源网站HandCare.org上的所有88份英语患者教育材料进行了基于互联网的研究。使用弗莱什易读性公式、弗莱什-金凯德年级水平、科尔曼-廖指数、冈宁-福格指数和晦涩难懂度简易测量年级水平来评估每篇文章的可读性。为了评估ASSH在线手外科患者教育材料可读性的趋势,将2020年发表文章的弗莱什-金凯德年级水平与2008年和2015年发表的数据进行了比较。

结果

患者教育材料的平均弗莱什易读性得分是57.6,处于高中阅读水平。根据所使用的可读性指标,患者教育材料的平均阅读年级水平在9.0至12.3之间。2020年所有ASSH患者教育材料的平均弗莱什-金凯德年级水平为9.8,显著优于2008年的10.4,但显著差于2015年的8.5。

结论

在线手外科患者教育材料继续以高于推荐的阅读年级水平面向普通大众编写。自2008年以来,在线手外科患者教育材料的可读性没有实质性提高。

临床意义

需要提高在线患者教育材料的可读性,以确保所有健康素养水平的患者都能够理解并从健康信息中受益。

相似文献

1
Readability of Online Hand Surgery Patient Educational Materials: Evaluating the Trend Since 2008.在线手部手术患者教育材料的可读性:评估自2008年以来的趋势
J Hand Surg Am. 2022 Feb;47(2):186.e1-186.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.03.025. Epub 2021 May 20.
2
Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.主要眼科协会在线患者教育材料评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;133(4):449-54. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.6104.
3
Readability of Spanish-Language Online Patient Educational Materials for Peripheral Artery Disease Do Not Meet Recommended Standards and Represent a Literacy Barrier to Care.西班牙语在线外周动脉疾病患者教育材料的可读性不符合推荐标准,代表了患者获取医疗服务的读写能力障碍。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 Apr;101:157-163. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.10.029. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
4
Readability of online patient education materials for shoulder instability surgery in English and Spanish.英文和西班牙文的肩部不稳定手术在线患者教育材料的可读性
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Oct;33(10):2220-2229. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.02.028. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
5
Hand Surgery Resources Exceed American Health Literacy.手部外科资源超出美国健康素养水平。
Hand (N Y). 2018 Sep;13(5):547-551. doi: 10.1177/1558944717725384. Epub 2017 Aug 20.
6
The Readability of AAOS Patient Education Materials: Evaluating the Progress Since 2008.美国矫形外科医师学会患者教育材料的可读性:评估自2008年以来的进展
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Sep 7;98(17):e70. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00658.
7
Comparative Readability of Shoulder and Elbow Patient Education Materials within Orthopaedic Websites.骨科网站上肩部和肘部患者教育材料的可读性比较
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2015 Dec;73(4):249-56.
8
The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.心脏杂音在线教育资料的质量、易懂性、可理解性和普及性。
Cardiol Young. 2020 Mar;30(3):328-336. doi: 10.1017/S104795111900307X. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
9
Evaluating the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Trigeminal Neuralgia.评估三叉神经痛在线患者教育材料的可读性。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Dec;144:e934-e938. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.09.123. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
10
Readability Trends of Online Information by the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation.美国耳鼻咽喉-头颈外科基金会在线信息的可读性趋势
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Jan;156(1):96-102. doi: 10.1177/0194599816674711. Epub 2016 Oct 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Educational Materials for Pheochromocytoma Exceed Recommended Readability Level: An Analysis Across Three Independent Reading Instruments.嗜铬细胞瘤患者教育材料超出推荐的可读性水平:基于三种独立阅读工具的分析
J Cancer Educ. 2025 Jun 21. doi: 10.1007/s13187-025-02666-3.
2
Reverse Osmosis Membrane Engineering: Multidirectional Analysis Using Bibliometric, Machine Learning, Data, and Text Mining Approaches.反渗透膜工程:使用文献计量学、机器学习、数据和文本挖掘方法的多方向分析
Membranes (Basel). 2024 Dec 6;14(12):259. doi: 10.3390/membranes14120259.
3
A cross-sectional quantitative analysis of the readability and quality of online resources regarding thumb carpometacarpal joint replacement surgery.
关于拇指腕掌关节置换手术的在线资源可读性和质量的横断面定量分析。
J Hand Microsurg. 2024 Jun 26;16(4):100119. doi: 10.1016/j.jham.2024.100119. eCollection 2024 Oct.
4
ChatGPT-4 Can Help Hand Surgeons Communicate Better With Patients.ChatGPT-4可帮助手外科医生更好地与患者沟通。
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2024 Apr 6;6(3):436-438. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.03.008. eCollection 2024 May.
5
Evaluation of Patient Education Materials From Large-Language Artificial Intelligence Models on Carpal Tunnel Release.基于大语言人工智能模型的腕管松解术患者教育材料评估
Hand (N Y). 2024 Apr 25:15589447241247332. doi: 10.1177/15589447241247332.
6
Internet Search Trends for Common Hand Surgery Diagnoses.常见手部手术诊断的互联网搜索趋势。
Cureus. 2023 Nov 30;15(11):e49755. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49755. eCollection 2023 Nov.
7
Entering the Misinformation Age: Quality and Reliability of YouTube for Patient Information on Liposuction.进入错误信息时代:YouTube 上抽脂患者信息的质量与可靠性
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2023 Nov;31(4):371-376. doi: 10.1177/22925503211064382. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
8
Health Information on Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis From Search Engines and Twitter: Readability Analysis.搜索引擎和 Twitter 上的暴露前预防健康信息:可读性分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Sep 4;9:e48630. doi: 10.2196/48630.