Suppr超能文献

美国警察杀害乔治·弗洛伊德以及随后的骚乱之后,美国学术界医学领导力的失败。

Failure of leadership in U.S. academic medicine after George Floyd's killing by police and amidst subsequent unrest.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; Center for Population Health Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA.

Center for Global Health and Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Ann Epidemiol. 2022 Jan;65:116-119. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.04.018. Epub 2021 May 21.

Abstract

The horrific nature of George Floyd's killing by a Minneapolis Police Department officer on May 25, 2020 sparked an enduring stretch of nationwide protests against police brutality and in support of the Black Lives Matter movement. During periods of crisis, anchor institutions may exert leadership by issuing public statements to communicate shared institutional values, enhance morale, and signal direction in the face of crisis. In our analysis of public statements issued by 56 leading U.S. medical schools, we found that nearly all identified George Floyd by name, and a majority noted the role of racism or acknowledged the Black community specifically. Fewer referenced the act resulting in Floyd's death or made explicit reference to the police. Far fewer explicitly used terms denoting active support, like "antiracism" or "Black Lives Matter." Only a minority of institutions made reference to the killing of George Floyd by the police, and most failed to address this country's targeted, historically engrained, and sustained oppression of Black people through white supremacy. Thus, there remain significant opportunities for U.S. medical schools to exert meaningful leadership in public health.

摘要

2020 年 5 月 25 日,美国明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯市警察局的一名警察杀害乔治·弗洛伊德,这一事件性质恶劣,引发了持久的全国性抗议活动,反对警察暴力,支持“黑人的命也是命”运动。在危机时期,锚定机构可以通过发表公开声明来发挥领导作用,传达共同的机构价值观,增强士气,并在危机面前指明方向。在对 56 所美国顶尖医学院发表的公开声明进行分析后,我们发现,几乎所有学校都明确提到了乔治·弗洛伊德的名字,大多数学校都提到了种族主义的作用,或特别提到了黑人社区。较少的学校提到导致弗洛伊德死亡的行为,或明确提到警察。明确表示支持的术语,如“反种族主义”或“黑人的命也是命”,则更少。只有少数机构提到警察杀害乔治·弗洛伊德的事件,而且大多数机构都没有解决这个国家通过白人至上主义对黑人有针对性、历史上根深蒂固和持续的压迫问题。因此,美国医学院在公共卫生方面发挥有意义的领导作用仍然有很大的机会。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Responsibilities of Medical Professionals Amidst Geopolitical Conflict.地缘政治冲突中医务人员的职责。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Apr;40(5):1169-1174. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09189-5. Epub 2024 Nov 18.

本文引用的文献

2
Fighting racism in schools of public health.在公共卫生学院中反对种族主义。
Lancet. 2020 Oct 31;396(10260):e66. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32157-7. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
3
The Path Forward - An Antiracist Approach to Academic Medicine.前进之路——学术医学的反种族主义方法
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 8;383(15):e91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMpv2024535. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
4
White Coats for Black Lives: The Time Has Come for Action.“为黑人生命穿上白大褂”:行动时刻已至。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Oct 20;173(8):656-657. doi: 10.7326/M20-4280. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
5
Assessing differential impacts of COVID-19 on black communities.评估 COVID-19 对黑人群体的差异化影响。
Ann Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;47:37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.05.003. Epub 2020 May 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验