• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于基于认知诊断的多阶段测试的自动测试组装

Automated Test Assembly for Multistage Testing With Cognitive Diagnosis.

作者信息

Li Guiyu, Cai Yan, Gao Xuliang, Wang Daxun, Tu Dongbo

机构信息

School of Psychology, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, China.

Department of Curriculum and Instruction, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 May 6;12:509844. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.509844. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.509844
PMID:34025486
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8136431/
Abstract

Computer multistage adaptive test (MST) combines the advantages of paper and pencil-based test (P&P) and computer-adaptive test (CAT). As CAT, MST is adaptive based on modules; as P&P, MST can meet the need of test developers to manage test forms and keep test forms parallel. Cognitive diagnosis (CD) can accurately measure students' knowledge states (KSs) and provide diagnostic information, which is conducive to student's self-learning and teacher's targeted teaching. Although MST and CD have a lot of advantages, many factors prevent MST from applying to CD. In this study, we first attempt to employ automated test assembly (ATA) to achieve the objectives of MST in the application of CD (called CD-MST) via heuristic algorithms. The mean correct response probability of all KSs for each item is used to describe the item difficulty of CD. The attribute reliability in CD is defined as the test quantitative target. A simulation study with the G-DINA model (generalized deterministic input noisy "and" gate model) was carried out to investigate the proposed CD-MST, and the results showed that the assembled panels of CD-MST satisfied the statistical and the non-statistical constraints.

摘要

计算机多级自适应测试(MST)结合了纸笔测试(P&P)和计算机自适应测试(CAT)的优点。与CAT一样,MST基于模块进行自适应;与P&P一样,MST可以满足测试开发者管理测试形式并保持测试形式平行的需求。认知诊断(CD)能够准确测量学生的知识状态(KSs)并提供诊断信息,这有利于学生的自主学习和教师的针对性教学。尽管MST和CD有很多优点,但诸多因素阻碍了MST应用于CD。在本研究中,我们首次尝试通过启发式算法采用自动组卷(ATA)来实现MST在CD应用中的目标(称为CD-MST)。用每个项目所有KSs的平均正确反应概率来描述CD的项目难度。将CD中的属性可靠性定义为测试定量目标。利用广义确定性输入噪声“与”门模型(G-DINA模型)进行了模拟研究,以考察所提出的CD-MST,结果表明CD-MST的组卷满足统计和非统计约束。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c5a/8136431/2a02287a5872/fpsyg-12-509844-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c5a/8136431/c461391e1701/fpsyg-12-509844-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c5a/8136431/de00e8cdc92b/fpsyg-12-509844-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c5a/8136431/0cf55646ad2d/fpsyg-12-509844-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c5a/8136431/8c540fe48d8c/fpsyg-12-509844-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c5a/8136431/2a02287a5872/fpsyg-12-509844-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c5a/8136431/c461391e1701/fpsyg-12-509844-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c5a/8136431/de00e8cdc92b/fpsyg-12-509844-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c5a/8136431/0cf55646ad2d/fpsyg-12-509844-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c5a/8136431/8c540fe48d8c/fpsyg-12-509844-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c5a/8136431/2a02287a5872/fpsyg-12-509844-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Automated Test Assembly for Multistage Testing With Cognitive Diagnosis.用于基于认知诊断的多阶段测试的自动测试组装
Front Psychol. 2021 May 6;12:509844. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.509844. eCollection 2021.
2
Utilizing response times in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing under the higher-order deterministic input, noisy 'and' gate model.利用高阶确定性输入、噪声“与”门模型下认知诊断计算机自适应测验中的反应时间。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2020 Feb;73(1):109-141. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12160. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
3
On-the-Fly Assembled Multistage Adaptive Testing.动态组装多级自适应测试
Appl Psychol Meas. 2015 Mar;39(2):104-118. doi: 10.1177/0146621614544519. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
4
Computerized Adaptive Testing for Cognitively Based Multiple-Choice Data.基于认知的多项选择题数据的计算机自适应测试
Appl Psychol Meas. 2019 Jul;43(5):388-401. doi: 10.1177/0146621618798665. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
5
Dual-Objective Item Selection Methods in Computerized Adaptive Test Using the Higher-Order Cognitive Diagnostic Models.使用高阶认知诊断模型的计算机自适应测试中的双目标项目选择方法
Appl Psychol Meas. 2022 Jul;46(5):422-438. doi: 10.1177/01466216221089342. Epub 2022 May 20.
6
Developing Multistage Tests Using -Scoring Method.使用-评分法开发多阶段测试。 (你提供的原文中“-Scoring Method”前面似乎少了具体内容,可能会影响更准确的理解和翻译)
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Oct;79(5):988-1008. doi: 10.1177/0013164419841428. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
7
Framework for Developing Multistage Testing With Intersectional Routing for Short-Length Tests.用于短长度测试的带交叉路由的多阶段测试开发框架。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2020 Mar;44(2):87-102. doi: 10.1177/0146621619837226. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
8
On Interim Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing in Learning Context.关于学习情境中的临时认知诊断计算机自适应测试
Appl Psychol Meas. 2021 Jun;45(4):235-252. doi: 10.1177/0146621621990755. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
9
The Optimal Item Pool Design in Multistage Computerized Adaptive Tests With the -Optimality Method.使用 - 最优性方法的多阶段计算机自适应测试中的最优项目池设计。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2020 Oct;80(5):955-974. doi: 10.1177/0013164419901292. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
10
Does standard deviation matter? Using "standard deviation" to quantify security of multistage testing.标准差重要吗?使用“标准差”量化多阶段测试的安全性。
Psychometrika. 2014 Jan;79(1):154-74. doi: 10.1007/s11336-013-9356-y. Epub 2013 Dec 10.

本文引用的文献

1
The Optimal Item Pool Design in Multistage Computerized Adaptive Tests With the -Optimality Method.使用 - 最优性方法的多阶段计算机自适应测试中的最优项目池设计。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2020 Oct;80(5):955-974. doi: 10.1177/0013164419901292. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
2
A Hybrid Strategy to Construct Multistage Adaptive Tests.一种构建多阶段自适应测试的混合策略。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2018 Nov;42(8):630-643. doi: 10.1177/0146621618762739. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
3
Probabilistic-Input, Noisy Conjunctive Models for Cognitive Diagnosis.用于认知诊断的概率输入噪声合取模型
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 14;9:997. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00997. eCollection 2018.
4
On-the-Fly Assembled Multistage Adaptive Testing.动态组装多级自适应测试
Appl Psychol Meas. 2015 Mar;39(2):104-118. doi: 10.1177/0146621614544519. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
5
The Effects of Q-Matrix Design on Classification Accuracy in the Log-Linear Cognitive Diagnosis Model.Q矩阵设计对对数线性认知诊断模型中分类准确性的影响
Educ Psychol Meas. 2015 Jun;75(3):491-511. doi: 10.1177/0013164414539162. Epub 2014 Jun 22.
6
Identifiability of Diagnostic Classification Models.诊断分类模型的可识别性。
Psychometrika. 2016 Sep;81(3):625-49. doi: 10.1007/s11336-015-9471-z. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
7
A multicomponent latent trait model for diagnosis.一种用于诊断的多成分潜在特质模型。
Psychometrika. 2013 Jan;78(1):14-36. doi: 10.1007/s11336-012-9296-y. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
8
Accurate placement of the esophageal pH electrode for 24-hour pH monitoring using a combined pH/manometry probe.使用pH/测压联合探头进行24小时pH监测时食管pH电极的准确放置。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 Apr;95(4):906-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.01927.x.