Klingler P J, Hinder R A, Wetscher G J, Davis D M, Achem S R, Seelig M H, O'Brien P, DeVault K R
Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Florida 32224, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 Apr;95(4):906-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.01927.x.
Accurate placement of a pH electrode requires manometric localization of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). Combined manometry/pH devices using water-perfused tubes attached to pH catheters and the use of an electronic "LES locator" have been reported. We investigated whether accurate placement of pH probes can be achieved using such a probe, and whether this may reduce the need for the performance of the usual stepwise pull-back manometry.
Thirty consecutive patients (15 men, 15 women; median age, 56 yr; interquartile range, 42-68 yr) referred for manometry and pH testing were included in the study. The localization of the LES was determined with standard esophageal manometry. After that, a second 3-mm pH electrode with an internal perfusion port was passed into the stomach. Using this catheter, a single stepwise pull-through manometry was performed and the LES position was noted. LES location, mean pressure, and length obtained with standard manometry were compared to data from the combined pH/manometry catheter. Additionally the time necessary to perform each of the procedures was noted and the patient's discomfort caused by the catheter was evaluated using a standardized questionnaire.
The LES location with the pH/manometry probe was proximal to that with standard manometry in 19 patients (63%), the same in nine patients (30%), and distal in two patients (7%). The differences were <2 cm in 29 of 30 (97%) patients. The LES location with the pH/manometry probe required a median of 6.5 min (interquartile range: 3.5-8.5 min) versus a median of 21.5 min (interquartile range: 14.5-26.5 min) for standard manometry (p < 0.0001). In addition, LES evaluation using the combined pH/manometry probe provided accurate data on the resting pressure, as well as overall and intraabdominal length of the LES. All patients tolerated the combination probe better than the standard manometry probe (p < 0.001).
Placement of the esophageal electrode for 24-h esophageal pH monitoring using a combined pH/manometry probe is accurate. The technique is simple, time-saving, and convenient for the patients. Because it is possible to accurately evaluate the LES using this technique, it may even replace conventional manometry before pH probe placement.
准确放置pH电极需要对食管下括约肌(LES)进行测压定位。已有报道使用连接到pH导管的水灌注管的联合测压/pH装置以及电子“LES定位器”。我们研究了使用这种探头是否能准确放置pH探头,以及这是否可以减少常规逐步回撤测压的必要性。
30例连续接受测压和pH检测的患者(15例男性,15例女性;年龄中位数56岁;四分位间距42 - 68岁)纳入本研究。通过标准食管测压确定LES的位置。之后,将第二个带有内部灌注端口的3毫米pH电极送入胃内。使用该导管进行单次逐步拉通测压并记录LES位置。将标准测压获得的LES位置、平均压力和长度与联合pH/测压导管的数据进行比较。此外,记录每个操作所需的时间,并使用标准化问卷评估导管给患者带来的不适。
使用pH/测压探头确定的LES位置比标准测压近端的患者有19例(63%),相同的有9例(30%),远端的有2例(7%)。30例患者中有29例(97%)差异<2厘米。使用pH/测压探头确定LES位置的中位数时间为6.5分钟(四分位间距:3.5 - 8.5分钟),而标准测压的中位数时间为21.5分钟(四分位间距:14.5 - 26.5分钟)(p < 0.0001)。此外,使用联合pH/测压探头评估LES可提供关于静息压力以及LES总长度和腹内长度的准确数据。所有患者对联合探头的耐受性均优于标准测压探头(p < 0.001)。
使用联合pH/测压探头进行24小时食管pH监测时食管电极的放置是准确的。该技术简单、省时且对患者方便。由于使用该技术可以准确评估LES,甚至可能在放置pH探头前取代传统测压。