勘误：荷兰特温特地区Grit-O量表的心理测量特性：ICM-CFA与ESEM方法对比
Corrigendum: The Psychometric Properties of the Grit-O Scale Within the Twente Region in Netherlands: An ICM-CFA vs. ESEM Approach.
作者信息
van Zyl Llewellyn E, Olckers Chantal, Roll Lara C
机构信息
Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Eindhoven, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Optentia Research Focus Area, North-West University (VTC), Vanderbijlpark, South Africa.
出版信息
Front Psychol. 2021 May 6;12:688081. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.688081. eCollection 2021.
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00796.].
摘要
[本文更正了文章的数字对象标识符：10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00796。]
相似文献
1
Corrigendum: The Psychometric Properties of the Grit-O Scale Within the Twente Region in Netherlands: An ICM-CFA vs. ESEM Approach.勘误：荷兰特温特地区Grit-O量表的心理测量特性：ICM-CFA与ESEM方法对比
Front Psychol. 2021 May 6;12:688081. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.688081. eCollection 2021.
2
Corrigendum: The Psychometric Properties of the Grit-O Scale Within the Twente Region in Netherlands: An ICM-CFA vs. ESEM Approach.勘误：荷兰特温特地区坚毅量表-O的心理测量特性：ICM-CFA与ESEM方法对比
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 20;11:623096. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.623096. eCollection 2020.
3
The Psychometric Properties of the Grit-O Scale Within the Twente Region in Netherlands: An ICM-CFA vs. ESEM Approach.荷兰特温特地区坚毅量表（Grit-O）的心理测量特性：ICM-CFA与ESEM方法对比
Front Psychol. 2020 May 7;11:796. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00796. eCollection 2020.
4
Validation of L2 grit among Chinese EFL high school students and its enduring effect on achievements: A bifactor model approach.中国高中英语学习者中L2毅力的验证及其对学业成绩的持久影响：一种双因素模型方法
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 29;13:971495. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.971495. eCollection 2022.
5
A Comparison of Reliability Estimation Based on Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Exploratory Structural Equation Models.基于验证性因子分析和探索性结构方程模型的信度估计比较
Educ Psychol Meas. 2022 Apr;82(2):205-224. doi: 10.1177/00131644211008953. Epub 2021 May 10.
6
Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM), and Set-ESEM: Optimal Balance Between Goodness of Fit and Parsimony.验证性因子分析（CFA）、探索性结构方程建模（ESEM）和集束-探索性结构方程建模（Set-ESEM）：拟合优度与简约性之间的最佳平衡。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2020 Jan-Feb;55(1):102-119. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2019.1602503. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
7
Testing the Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance Across Gender of the Big Five Inventory Through Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling.通过探索性结构方程模型检验大五人格量表的因素结构及性别间测量不变性
J Pers Assess. 2016;98(1):88-99. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2015.1035381. Epub 2015 May 1.
8
Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Analysis of the Social Network Site Use Motives Scale.社交网站使用动机量表的探索性结构方程模型分析
Psychiatry Investig. 2022 Feb;19(2):146-153. doi: 10.30773/pi.2021.0092. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
9
Exploratory structural equation modeling: an integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.探索性结构方程模型：探索性和验证性因子分析最佳特征的整合。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2014;10:85-110. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
10
Construct Validity of the Social Provisions Scale: A Bifactor Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Approach.社会支持量表的结构效度：一种双因素探索性结构方程建模方法。
Assessment. 2016 Dec;23(6):720-733. doi: 10.1177/1073191115589344. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
Zotero 插件