• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年临终关怀中医师的法律与伦理准则。

Legal and ethical guidelines for physicians in geriatric terminal care.

作者信息

Rouse F

机构信息

Legal services for the Society for the Right to Die, Inc., New York City.

出版信息

Geriatrics. 1988 Aug;43(8):69-70, 74-5.

PMID:3402738
Abstract

In the American legal system, the right to refuse treatment--the right, in other words, to be "let alone"--is an important aspect of autonomy and individuality. In health care decision making, people rarely choose to have no treatment at all, but usually choose from among various forms of medical treatment. Even when aggressive technological options are rejected, patients will often elect to have intensive nursing and pain control. Sometimes they choose to forego treatment and risk hastening death. Particularly among the elderly, a series of small decisions may have to be made as health status worsens over time. No matter what the decision, in observing patients' wishes, physicians will find support in current ethical and legal concepts.

摘要

在美国法律体系中,拒绝治疗的权利——换言之,即“独处”的权利——是自主性和个性的一个重要方面。在医疗决策中,人们很少选择完全不接受治疗,而是通常在各种医疗形式中进行选择。即使拒绝了激进的技术手段,患者往往也会选择接受重症护理和疼痛控制。有时他们会选择放弃治疗并冒着加速死亡的风险。特别是在老年人中,随着健康状况随时间恶化,可能需要做出一系列小决策。无论做出何种决定,在遵循患者意愿方面,医生都能从当前的伦理和法律观念中找到支持。

相似文献

1
Legal and ethical guidelines for physicians in geriatric terminal care.老年临终关怀中医师的法律与伦理准则。
Geriatrics. 1988 Aug;43(8):69-70, 74-5.
2
Ethical and legal issues in the care of the elderly cancer patient.
Clin Geriatr Med. 1987 Aug;3(3):541-7.
3
The ethical and legal framework for the decision not to resuscitate.不进行心肺复苏决策的伦理与法律框架。
West J Med. 1984 Jan;140(1):117-22.
4
The concept of futility. Patients do not have a right to demand medically useless treatment. Counterpoint.无效治疗的概念。患者无权要求进行医学上无用的治疗。相反观点。
Health Prog. 1993 Dec;74(10):28-32.
5
Life-sustaining treatment: the physician's role in decision-making.维持生命的治疗:医生在决策中的作用。
Geriatrics. 1992 Jan;47(1):68-70.
6
Resuscitation decisions.复苏决策。
Clin Geriatr Med. 1986 Aug;2(3):535-45.
7
Decisions to withhold or terminate treatment.停止或终止治疗的决定。
Neurol Clin. 1989 Nov;7(4):759-74.
8
Ethical issues in caring for elderly residents of nursing homes.养老院照顾老年居民中的伦理问题。
Prim Care. 1986 Jun;13(2):295-306.
9
Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.“婴儿多伊”事件重演?美国卫生与公众服务部及2002年《出生时存活婴儿保护法》:关于规范新生儿医疗行为的警示
Pediatrics. 2005 Oct;116(4):e576-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1590.
10
The DNR decision--Part II. Ethical principles and application.“不要复苏”决定——第二部分。伦理原则与应用。
Dimens Oncol Nurs. 1991 Summer;5(2):34-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Durable power of attorney for health care. Are we ready for it?医疗保健持久授权书。我们准备好了吗?
West J Med. 1991 Sep;155(3):263-8.