School of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Department of Psychology, University of Quebec at Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
Health Psychol Rev. 2021 Sep;15(3):350-370. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2021.1934062. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
This scoping review focused on answering key questions about the focus, quality and generalisability of the quantitative evidence on the determinants of adherence to social distancing measures in research during the first wave of COVID-19. The review included 84 studies. The majority of included studies were conducted in Western Europe and the USA. Many lacked theoretical input, were at risk for bias, and few were experimental in design. The most commonly coded domains of the TDF in the included studies were 'Environmental Context and Resources' (388 codes across 76 studies), 'Beliefs about Consequences' (34 codes across 21 studies), 'Emotion' (28 codes across 12 studies), and 'Social Influences' (26 codes across 16 studies). The least frequently coded TDF domains included 'Optimism' (not coded), 'Intentions' (coded once), 'Goals' (2 codes across 2 studies), 'Reinforcement' (3 codes across 2 studies), and 'Behavioural Regulation' (3 codes across 3 studies). Examining the focus of the included studies identified a lack of studies on potentially important determinants of adherence such as reinforcement, goal setting and self-monitoring. The quality of the included studies was variable and their generalisablity was threatened by their reliance on convenience samples.
本范围综述主要关注回答有关 COVID-19 第一波期间研究中社会隔离措施依从性决定因素的定量证据的重点、质量和普遍性的关键问题。本综述包括 84 项研究。纳入的研究大多在西欧和美国进行。许多研究缺乏理论投入，存在偏倚风险，且很少有设计为实验性的。纳入研究中 TDF 最常编码的领域是“环境背景和资源”（76 项研究中有 388 个代码）、“对后果的信念”（21 项研究中有 34 个代码）、“情绪”（12 项研究中有 28 个代码）和“社会影响”（16 项研究中有 26 个代码）。TDF 编码最少的领域包括“乐观”（未编码）、“意图”（编码一次）、“目标”（2 项研究中有 2 个代码）、“强化”（2 项研究中有 3 个代码）和“行为监管”（3 项研究中有 3 个代码）。检查纳入研究的重点发现，缺乏对依从性的潜在重要决定因素的研究，如强化、目标设定和自我监测。纳入研究的质量参差不齐，其普遍性受到仅依赖方便样本的威胁。
