Fujiwara Motohiro, Tanaka Hajime, Yuasa Takeshi, Komai Yoshinobu, Oguchi Tomohiko, Fujiwara Ryo, Numao Noboru, Yamamoto Shinya, Fujii Yasuhisa, Fukui Iwao, Yonese Junji
Department of Urology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School, Tokyo, Japan.
Int J Urol. 2021 Sep;28(9):920-926. doi: 10.1111/iju.14604. Epub 2021 May 24.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of first-line etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin and primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim as first-line chemotherapy for disseminated germ cell cancer.
This study reviewed 154 consecutive patients with previously untreated disseminated germ cell cancer who received first-line etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin between 1995 and 2020. Of these, 54 patients were managed with primary prophylaxis using pegfilgrastim (primary prophylaxis group), and 100 were managed with the therapeutic use of short-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (non-primary prophylaxis group).
The International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group classification identified 90 (58%)/40 (26%)/24 (16%) patients with good/intermediate/poor prognosis, respectively. Overall, 139 patients (90%) were disease free after etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin with/without post-chemotherapy surgery. The median relative dose intensity of etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin was 96%, and there was a significant difference between the primary prophylaxis and non-primary prophylaxis groups (100% vs 90%, P < 0.01). The 5-year salvage treatment-free and overall survival rates were 83% and 94%, respectively. In total, 138 patients (90%) developed grade 4 hematological toxicities, and there were no treatment-related deaths due to myelosuppression. Grade 4 neutropenia was less commonly observed in the primary prophylaxis group compared with the non-primary prophylaxis group (80% vs 95%, P < 0.01).
This is the largest study of first-line etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin, and its sufficient efficacy and safety profiles are confirmed in current clinical practice. Primary prophylaxis using pegfilgrastim might further improve the feasibility of etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin.
评估一线依托泊苷、异环磷酰胺和顺铂以及聚乙二醇化重组人粒细胞刺激因子一级预防作为播散性生殖细胞癌一线化疗的疗效和安全性。
本研究回顾了1995年至2020年间连续154例既往未治疗的播散性生殖细胞癌患者,这些患者接受了一线依托泊苷、异环磷酰胺和顺铂治疗。其中,54例患者采用聚乙二醇化重组人粒细胞刺激因子进行一级预防(一级预防组),100例患者采用短效粒细胞集落刺激因子进行治疗性使用(非一级预防组)。
国际生殖细胞癌协作组分类分别确定了90例(58%)/40例(26%)/24例(16%)预后良好/中等/较差的患者。总体而言,139例患者(90%)在接受依托泊苷、异环磷酰胺和顺铂治疗(无论是否进行化疗后手术)后无疾病。依托泊苷、异环磷酰胺和顺铂的中位相对剂量强度为96%,一级预防组和非一级预防组之间存在显著差异(100%对90%,P<0.01)。5年无挽救治疗生存率和总生存率分别为83%和94%。共有138例患者(90%)发生4级血液学毒性,且无因骨髓抑制导致的治疗相关死亡。与非一级预防组相比,一级预防组较少观察到4级中性粒细胞减少(80%对95%,P<0.01)。
这是关于一线依托泊苷、异环磷酰胺和顺铂的最大规模研究,其疗效和安全性在当前临床实践中得到了充分证实。使用聚乙二醇化重组人粒细胞刺激因子进行一级预防可能会进一步提高依托泊苷、异环磷酰胺和顺铂的可行性。