Gullberg R G
Washington State Patrol, Crime Laboratory Division, Seattle 98104.
Forensic Sci Int. 1988 May;37(3):205-13. doi: 10.1016/0379-0738(88)90186-7.
Duplicate breath alcohol testing from each individual provides confidence in the results when reasonable agreement (i.e. +/- 0.02 g/210 L) is achieved. For this reason many jurisdictions require duplicate testing. The State of Washington has recently implemented an infrared breath testing program and now requires two breath samples from each individual. Statistical analysis of 1847 duplicate breath tests is presented. Three variables are analyzed: first alcohol result (ALC1), the absolute difference between the two breath samples (DIFFA), and the signed difference between the two breath samples (DIFFS). The first breath alcohol result ranged from 0.021 to 0.338 g/210 L with a mean of 0.157 g/210 L. The absolute difference ranged from 0.00 to 0.05 g/210 L. The signed difference ranged from -0.05 g/210 L to 0.05 g/210 L. The absolute difference was regressed upon the first alcohol result and resulted in poor linear correlation of r = 0.212. Duplicate breath test differences do not appear to be a function of subject's alcohol level, but rather of sample provision.
当每个个体的两次呼气酒精测试结果达成合理一致(即±0.02克/210升)时,可增强对测试结果的信心。因此,许多司法管辖区都要求进行重复测试。华盛顿州最近实施了一项红外呼气测试计划,现在要求每个个体提供两份呼气样本。本文对1847次重复呼气测试进行了统计分析。分析了三个变量:首次酒精测试结果(ALC1)、两份呼气样本之间的绝对差值(DIFFA)以及两份呼气样本之间的带符号差值(DIFFS)。首次呼气酒精测试结果范围为0.021至0.338克/210升,平均值为0.157克/210升。绝对差值范围为0.00至0.05克/210升。带符号差值范围为-0.05克/210升至0.05克/210升。将绝对差值对首次酒精测试结果进行回归分析,得到的线性相关性较差,r = 0.212。重复呼气测试的差异似乎并非取决于受试者的酒精水平,而是与样本采集有关。