Tang Wei, Khalili Leila, Giles Jon, Gartshteyn Yevgeniya, Kapoor Teja, Guo Cathy, Chen Tommy, Theodore Deborah, Askanase Anca
Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, 2nd Floor, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Rheumatol Ther. 2021 Jun;8(2):681-691. doi: 10.1007/s40744-021-00315-x. Epub 2021 May 24.
Since the first outbreak of Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) in January 2020, the medical community has been pursuing effective countermeasures. Early in the pandemic, several small clinical and in vitro studies from France and China reported on the efficacy of chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) against SARS-CoV-2 infections, which generated global attention towards these decades-old antimalarials (AM) and heralded numerous studies investigating their role in treating COVID-19. Despite several observational studies early in the pandemic affirming their beneficial role in treating COVID-19, 12 clinical studies reported no mortality benefits for CQ/HCQ in COVID-19 patients. The excitement over CQ/HCQ was ultimately quenched after three large randomized clinical trials, the COALITION-I trial in Brazil, the RECOVERY trial in the United Kingdom (UK), and the SOLIDARITY trial from World Health Organization (WHO) consistently reported no beneficial effects for CQ/HCQ in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. While initial studies suggested that CQ/HCQ might have a role in treating the early phases of infection, the results from three rigorously designed studies investigating their role in non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients were equivocal and inconsistent. Here we review the major social events related to the therapeutic use of CQ/HCQ in COVID-19, and the data from selected clinical studies evaluating their efficacy in hospitalized and non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients along with the major safety concerns.
自2020年1月首次爆发新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)以来,医学界一直在寻求有效的应对措施。在疫情早期,法国和中国的几项小型临床和体外研究报告了氯喹(CQ)和羟氯喹(HCQ)对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染的疗效,这引起了全球对这些已有数十年历史的抗疟药(AM)的关注,并引发了大量研究来调查它们在治疗COVID-19中的作用。尽管在疫情早期有几项观察性研究证实了它们在治疗COVID-19中的有益作用,但12项临床研究报告称CQ/HCQ对COVID-19患者并无降低死亡率的益处。在三项大型随机临床试验之后,对CQ/HCQ的热情最终消退,这三项试验分别是巴西的COALITION-I试验、英国(UK)的RECOVERY试验以及世界卫生组织(WHO)的SOLIDARITY试验,这些试验一致报告称CQ/HCQ对住院的COVID-19患者没有有益效果。虽然最初的研究表明CQ/HCQ可能在治疗感染的早期阶段发挥作用,但三项针对它们在非住院COVID-19患者中作用的精心设计研究结果却模棱两可且不一致。在此,我们回顾与CQ/HCQ在COVID-19治疗应用相关的主要社会事件,以及评估它们在住院和非住院COVID-19患者中疗效的选定临床研究数据,以及主要的安全问题。