Greenland S, Frerichs R R
Division of Epidemiology, UCLA School of Public Health 90024.
Int J Epidemiol. 1988 Jun;17(2):456-63. doi: 10.1093/ije/17.2.456.
Smith, Rodrigues and Fine have discussed and linked different measures, models, and study designs for the assessment of vaccines. The present paper responds to a number of issues implicitly raised by these authors. In particular, it is argued that measures and models need to be considered independently, with choice of measure depending on evaluation objectives, and choice of model depending on consideration of both mechanism of administration and mechanism of action. Models in which a particular measure remains constant tend to be unrealistic for evaluating field effectiveness. Some technical issues arising in the design and analysis of case-control studies of vaccines are also addressed.
史密斯、罗德里格斯和法恩讨论并关联了用于评估疫苗的不同测量方法、模型和研究设计。本文回应了这些作者隐含提出的一些问题。特别是,有人认为测量方法和模型需要独立考虑,测量方法的选择取决于评估目标,模型的选择则取决于对给药机制和作用机制的考量。特定测量方法保持不变的模型对于评估现场有效性往往不切实际。本文还讨论了疫苗病例对照研究设计和分析中出现的一些技术问题。