Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 1992 Nov 27;67(48):357-61.
Unexpected results suggesting decreased survival when compared with standard titre vaccine administered at 9 months of age have been found in some field studies evaluating the performance of high titre measles vaccine. Analytical difficulties have arisen because the studies were not specifically designed to measure survival. Nonetheless, careful analysis of the results from all of the high titre vaccine trials showed decreased survival of high titre vaccine recipients, in areas with high background mortality rates, compared with recipients of standard measles vaccines at 9 months. No systematic biases could be found in the studies to explain these differences. Statistical analysis of these data suggested that the findings were unlikely to be attributable to chance alone. The panel recommended that high titre measles vaccine derived from the original Edmonston measles vaccine isolate should no longer be recommended for use in immunization programmes. Further post-licensure field studies of new measles vaccines should take into account the results of these studies. Additional detailed epidemiological studies in populations that have received high titre vaccines and their controls were encouraged.
在一些评估高滴度麻疹疫苗性能的现场研究中,发现了一些意外结果,即与9月龄时接种的标准滴度疫苗相比,生存率有所下降。由于这些研究并非专门设计用于测量生存率,因此出现了分析上的困难。尽管如此,对所有高滴度疫苗试验结果的仔细分析表明,在背景死亡率较高的地区,与9月龄时接种标准麻疹疫苗的受种者相比,高滴度疫苗受种者的生存率有所下降。在这些研究中未发现系统性偏差来解释这些差异。对这些数据的统计分析表明,这些发现不太可能仅归因于偶然。该小组建议,源自原始埃德蒙斯顿麻疹疫苗毒株的高滴度麻疹疫苗不应再推荐用于免疫规划。新麻疹疫苗的进一步上市后现场研究应考虑这些研究结果。鼓励对接种过高滴度疫苗的人群及其对照进行更多详细的流行病学研究。