• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用液基细胞学技术的巴氏染色与液基薄层细胞学技术检测高级别尿路上皮癌的对比研究

Quantitative cytomorphological comparison of SurePath and ThinPrep liquid-based cytology using high-grade urothelial carcinoma cells.

机构信息

Department of Medical Biophysics, Kobe University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Kobe, Japan.

Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.

出版信息

Cytopathology. 2021 Sep;32(5):654-659. doi: 10.1111/cyt.12998. Epub 2021 Jun 10.

DOI:10.1111/cyt.12998
PMID:34033150
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (TPS), the important cytomorphological features for diagnosing high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC) are a nuclear-to-cytoplasmic (N:C) ratio exceeding 0.7, hyperchromasia, coarse chromatin, and irregular nuclear borders. However, quantitative cytomorphological assessments of HGUC cells using SurePath slides are rare. Therefore, we evaluated HGUC cells on SurePath slides quantitatively using a digital image analysis system and compared these data with ThinPrep data.

METHODS

The same urine samples were divided into two aliquots and used to prepare SurePath and ThinPrep slides. We used ImageJ to measure the N:C ratio, hyperchromasia, and irregular nuclear borders for HGUC cells on SurePath and ThinPrep slides.

RESULTS

The total number of analysed HGUC cells on SurePath slides was 981, versus 889 on ThinPrep slides. Hyperchromasia and irregular nuclear borders were significantly more severe on SurePath than on ThinPrep slides. Conversely, the N:C ratio did not differ between the methods. Additionally, HGUC cells with N:C ratios exceeding 0.7 were present on almost all slides for both methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicated the reasonableness of using the N:C ratio as the major criterion for TPS on both SurePath and ThinPrep slides, and an N:C ratio cut-off of 0.7 as suitable for identifying HGUC cells. However, the severity of hyperchromasia and irregular nuclear borders differed between the processing methods.

摘要

目的

在巴黎泌尿系统细胞学报告系统(TPS)中,诊断高级别尿路上皮癌(HGUC)的重要细胞学形态特征是核质比(N:C)超过 0.7、核浆比增高、粗染色质和不规则核边界。然而,使用 SurePath 载玻片对 HGUC 细胞进行定量细胞学评估较为少见。因此,我们使用数字图像分析系统对 SurePath 载玻片上的 HGUC 细胞进行定量评估,并将这些数据与 ThinPrep 数据进行比较。

方法

将相同的尿液样本分为两份,分别用于制备 SurePath 和 ThinPrep 载玻片。我们使用 ImageJ 测量 SurePath 和 ThinPrep 载玻片上 HGUC 细胞的 N:C 比值、核浆比增高和不规则核边界。

结果

SurePath 载玻片上分析的 HGUC 细胞总数为 981 个,而 ThinPrep 载玻片上为 889 个。SurePath 载玻片上的核浆比增高和不规则核边界明显比 ThinPrep 载玻片上严重。相反,两种方法的 N:C 比值无差异。此外,两种方法的载玻片上几乎都存在 N:C 比值超过 0.7 的 HGUC 细胞。

结论

我们的数据表明,在 SurePath 和 ThinPrep 载玻片上使用 N:C 比值作为 TPS 的主要标准是合理的,N:C 比值为 0.7 作为识别 HGUC 细胞的合适标准。然而,两种处理方法的核浆比增高和不规则核边界的严重程度存在差异。

相似文献

1
Quantitative cytomorphological comparison of SurePath and ThinPrep liquid-based cytology using high-grade urothelial carcinoma cells.应用液基细胞学技术的巴氏染色与液基薄层细胞学技术检测高级别尿路上皮癌的对比研究
Cytopathology. 2021 Sep;32(5):654-659. doi: 10.1111/cyt.12998. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
2
Split-sample comparison of urothelial cells in ThinPrep and cytospin preparations in urinary cytology: Do we need to adjust The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology criteria?尿细胞学中 ThinPrep 和离心涂片中尿路上皮细胞的分样比较:我们是否需要调整《巴黎系统报告尿细胞学标准》?
Cancer Cytopathol. 2020 Feb;128(2):119-125. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22218. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
3
Are we on track for diagnosing high-grade urothelial carcinoma with a minimum quantity of five malignant cells in lower tract specimens? Critical analysis of The Paris System Quantitation Criteria.我们是否有望通过在下尿路标本中检测到最少 5 个恶性细胞来诊断高级尿路上皮癌?对巴黎系统定量标准的批判性分析。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2023 Nov;131(11):708-715. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22749. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
4
The usefulness of nuclear area in the diagnosis of high-grade urothelial carcinoma cells in voided urine cytology.核面积在尿脱落细胞学诊断高级别尿路上皮癌细胞中的作用。
Cytopathology. 2023 Jul;34(4):295-301. doi: 10.1111/cyt.13229. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
5
Comparison of conventional and liquid-based cytology using The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology.《巴黎泌尿系统细胞病理学报告系统》中常规与液基细胞学的比较。
Cytopathology. 2021 Nov;32(6):795-801. doi: 10.1111/cyt.13040. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
6
Nuclear membrane irregularity in high-grade urothelial carcinoma cells can be measured by using circularity and solidity as morphometric shape definitions in digital image analysis of urinary tract cytology specimens.高级别尿路上皮癌细胞核膜不规则性可以通过在尿路上皮细胞学标本的数字图像分析中使用圆形度和密实度作为形态计量形状定义来测量。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2023 Jun;131(6):351-359. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22682. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
7
Digital image analysis supports a nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio cutoff value below 0.7 for positive for high-grade urothelial carcinoma and suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma in urine cytology specimens.数字图像分析支持核质比截断值低于 0.7 用于尿液细胞学标本中高级尿路上皮癌的阳性和高级尿路上皮癌的可疑诊断。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2019 Feb;127(2):120-124. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22061. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
8
Modification of The Paris System for urinary tract washing specimens using diagnostic cytological features.利用诊断性细胞学特征对巴黎系统进行尿路冲洗标本的修改。
Cytopathology. 2017 Dec;28(6):516-523. doi: 10.1111/cyt.12450. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
9
An institutional experience with The Paris System: A paradigm shift from ambiguous terminology to more objective criteria for reporting urine cytology.巴黎系统的机构经验:从模糊术语到更客观的尿液细胞学报告标准的范式转变。
Cytopathology. 2017 Dec;28(6):509-515. doi: 10.1111/cyt.12448. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
10
Urine Cytology Findings in Cases of Pseudocarcinomatous Urothelial Hyperplasia of the Bladder Often Represent a Diagnostic Challenge.膀胱假癌性尿路上皮增生病例的尿液细胞学检查结果常常具有诊断挑战性。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2023 Jun 1;147(6):716-721. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2022-0125-OA.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of brush rinse on the diagnostic accuracy of biliary stricture evaluation: A multicenter trial.刷检冲洗对胆管狭窄评估诊断准确性的影响:一项多中心试验。
World J Clin Cases. 2025 May 26;13(15):99212. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i15.99212.
2
Does artificial intelligence redefine nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio threshold for diagnosing high-grade urothelial carcinoma?人工智能是否重新定义了诊断高级别尿路上皮癌的核质比阈值?
Cancer Cytopathol. 2025 May;133(5):e70017. doi: 10.1002/cncy.70017.
3
Quantitative Structural Analysis of Hyperchromatic Crowded Cell Groups in Cervical Cytology: Overcoming Diagnostic Pitfalls.
宫颈细胞学中嗜碱性浓集细胞群的定量结构分析:克服诊断陷阱
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Dec 21;16(24):4258. doi: 10.3390/cancers16244258.
4
Large-scale validation study of an improved semiautonomous urine cytology assessment tool: AutoParis-X.一项改进型半自动尿液细胞学评估工具的大规模验证研究:AutoParis-X。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2023 Oct;131(10):637-654. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22732. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
5
Examining longitudinal markers of bladder cancer recurrence through a semiautonomous machine learning system for quantifying specimen atypia from urine cytology.通过半自主机器学习系统定量分析尿液细胞学标本非典型性,检测膀胱癌复发的纵向标志物。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2023 Sep;131(9):561-573. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22725. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
6
Iodinated Contrast Medium Affects Urine Cytology Assessment: A Prospective, Single-Blind Study and Its Impact on Urological Practice.碘化造影剂影响尿液细胞学评估:一项前瞻性单盲研究及其对泌尿外科实践的影响。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Oct 13;12(10):2483. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12102483.
7
p53 expression in repair/reactive renal tubular cells: A potential pitfall leading to a false-positive diagnosis of urine cytology.p53 在修复/反应性肾小管细胞中的表达:可能导致尿细胞学假阳性诊断的潜在陷阱。
Cancer Med. 2021 Dec;10(24):8846-8853. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4389. Epub 2021 Nov 16.