Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich and Clinical Neuroscience Center, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Neurosurgery, Cantonal Hospital St.Gallen, St.Gallen, Switzerland.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 Feb 15;47(4):337-342. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004128.
Prospective observational cohort study.
The aim of this study was to provide external validation of the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of the Timed-up-and-go (TUG) test.
The TUG test is one of the best explored and most frequently applied objective task-based functional outcome measure in patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD). The increased use of the TUG test is based on its solid psychometric properties; however, an external validation of the originally determined MCID is lacking.
Forty-nine patients with lumbar DDD, scheduled for elective spine surgery, were assessed pre- and 6-weeks (W6) postoperative. MCID values were calculate for raw TUG test times (seconds) and standardized TUG z scores using three different computation methods and the following established patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as anchors: Visual Analog Scales (VAS), Core Outcome Measures Index Back, Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ).
The three computation methods generated a range of MCID values, depending on the PROM used as anchor, from 0.9 s (z score of 0.3) based on the VAS leg pain to 3.0 seconds (z score of 2.7) based on the ZCQ physical function scale. The average MCID of the TUG test across all anchors and computation methods was 2.1 s (z score of 1.5). According to the average MCID of raw TUG test values or TUG z scores, 41% and 43% of patients classified as W6 responders to surgery, respectively.
This study confirms the ordinally reported TUG MCID values in patients undergoing surgery for lumbar. A TUG test time change of 2.1 seconds (or TUG z score change of 1.5) indicates an objective and clinically meaningful change in functional status. This report facilitates the interpretation of TUG test results in clinical routine as well as in research.Level of Evidence: 3.
前瞻性观察队列研究。
本研究旨在为计时起立行走测试(TUG)的最小临床重要差异(MCID)提供外部验证。
TUG 测试是一种经过深入研究且常用于腰椎退行性椎间盘疾病(DDD)患者的最佳客观基于任务的功能结果测量方法之一。TUG 测试的广泛应用基于其可靠的心理测量学特性;然而,其最初确定的 MCID 缺乏外部验证。
49 例腰椎 DDD 患者,计划接受择期脊柱手术,分别在术前和术后 6 周(W6)进行评估。使用三种不同的计算方法和以下既定的患者报告结局测量(PROM)作为锚定物,计算原始 TUG 测试时间(秒)和标准化 TUG z 分数的 MCID 值:视觉模拟量表(VAS)、核心结局测量指数背部、苏黎世跛行问卷(ZCQ)。
三种计算方法根据用作锚定物的 PROM,生成了不同的 MCID 值范围,从基于 VAS 腿部疼痛的 0.9 秒(z 分数为 0.3)到基于 ZCQ 身体功能量表的 3.0 秒(z 分数为 2.7)。所有锚定物和计算方法的 TUG 测试平均 MCID 为 2.1 秒(z 分数为 1.5)。根据原始 TUG 测试值或 TUG z 分数的平均 MCID,分别有 41%和 43%的患者被归类为手术 W6 应答者。
本研究证实了接受腰椎手术的患者 TUG 报告的 MCID 值。TUG 测试时间变化 2.1 秒(或 TUG z 分数变化 1.5)表明功能状态的客观和临床有意义的变化。本报告有助于在临床常规和研究中解释 TUG 测试结果。
3 级。