Suppr超能文献

退行性腰椎疾病患者自我测量的6分钟步行试验和计时起立行走测试的反应性

Responsiveness of the self-measured 6-minute walking test and the Timed Up and Go test in patients with degenerative lumbar disorders.

作者信息

Maldaner Nicolai, Sosnova Marketa, Zeitlberger Anna M, Ziga Michal, Gautschi Oliver P, Regli Luca, Bozinov Oliver, Weyerbrock Astrid, Stienen Martin N

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich and Clinical Neuroscience Center, University of Zurich.

Department of Neurosurgery, Kantonsspital St. Gallen.

出版信息

J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 May 7;35(1):52-59. doi: 10.3171/2020.11.SPINE201621.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The 6-minute walking test (6WT) and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test are two of the most commonly applied standardized measures of objective functional impairment that help support clinical decision-making for patients undergoing surgery for degenerative lumbar disorders. This study correlates smartphone-app-based 6WT and TUG results to evaluate their responsiveness.

METHODS

In a prospective study, 49 consecutive patients were assessed preoperatively and 6 weeks postoperatively using the 6WT, the TUG test, and commonly used patient-reported outcome measures. Raw values and standardized z-scores of both objective tests were correlated. An external criterion for treatment success was created based on the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire patient satisfaction subscale. Internal and external responsiveness for both functional tests was evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative 6WT results improved from 401 m (SD 129 m), z-score -1.65 (SD 1.6) to 495 m (SD 129 m), z-score -0.71 (SD 1.6, p < 0.001). The mean preoperative TUG test results improved from 10.44 seconds (SD 4.37, z-score: -3.22) to 8.47 seconds (SD 3.38, z-score: -1.93, p < 0.001). The 6WT showed a strong negative correlation with TUG test results (r = -66, 95% CI 0.76-0.53, p < 0.001). The 6WT showed higher internal responsiveness (standardized responsive mean = 0.86) compared to the TUG test (standardized responsive mean = 0.67). Evaluation of external responsiveness revealed that the 6WT was capable of differentiating between patients who were satisfied and those who were unsatisfied with their treatment results (area under the curve = 0.70), whereas this was not evident for the TUG test ( area under the curve = 0.53).

CONCLUSIONS

Both tests adequately quantified functional impairment in surgical candidates with degenerative lumbar disorders. The 6WT demonstrated better internal and external responsiveness compared with the TUG test. Clinical trial registration no.: NCT03977961 (clinicaltrials.gov).

ABBREVIATIONS

AUC = area under the curve; COMI = Core Outcome Measures Index; DLDs = degenerative lumbar disorders; LDH = lumbar disc herniation; LSS = lumbar spinal stenosis; PROM = patient-reported outcome measure; ROC = receiver operating characteristic; SRM = standardized responsive mean; TUG = Timed Up and Go; VAS = visual analog scale; 6WD = 6-minute walking distance; 6WT = 6-minute walking test; ZCQ = Zurich Claudication Questionnaire.

摘要

目的

6分钟步行试验(6WT)和计时起立行走试验(TUG)是最常用的客观功能障碍标准化测量方法中的两种,有助于为退行性腰椎疾病手术患者的临床决策提供支持。本研究将基于智能手机应用程序的6WT和TUG结果进行关联,以评估它们的反应性。

方法

在一项前瞻性研究中,连续49例患者在术前和术后6周接受了6WT、TUG试验以及常用的患者报告结局指标评估。对两种客观测试的原始值和标准化z分数进行了关联分析。基于苏黎世跛行问卷患者满意度子量表建立了治疗成功的外部标准。评估了两种功能测试的内部和外部反应性。

结果

术前6WT的平均结果从401米(标准差129米)、z分数-1.65(标准差1.6)提高到495米(标准差129米)、z分数-0.71(标准差1.6,p<0.001)。术前TUG试验的平均结果从10.44秒(标准差4.37,z分数:-3.22)提高到8.47秒(标准差3.38,z分数:-1.93,p<0.001)。6WT与TUG试验结果呈强烈负相关(r=-66,95%可信区间0.76-0.53,p<0.001)。与TUG试验(标准化反应均值=0.67)相比,6WT显示出更高的内部反应性(标准化反应均值=0.86)。外部反应性评估显示,6WT能够区分对治疗结果满意和不满意的患者(曲线下面积=0.70),而TUG试验则不明显(曲线下面积=0.53)。

结论

两种测试均能充分量化退行性腰椎疾病手术候选者的功能障碍。与TUG试验相比,6WT显示出更好的内部和外部反应性。临床试验注册号:NCT03977961(clinicaltrials.gov)。

缩写

AUC=曲线下面积;COMI=核心结局指标指数;DLDs=退行性腰椎疾病;LDH=腰椎间盘突出症;LSS=腰椎管狭窄症;PROM=患者报告结局指标;ROC=受试者工作特征曲线;SRM=标准化反应均值;TUG=计时起立行走试验;VAS=视觉模拟评分法;6WD=6分钟步行距离;6WT=6分钟步行试验;ZCQ=苏黎世跛行问卷

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验