Stryker Shanna D, Andrew Yockey Robert, Rabin Julia, Vaughn Lisa M, Jacquez Farrah
Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
School of Human Services, College of Education, Criminal Justice, and Human Services, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Health Equity. 2021 May 19;5(1):338-344. doi: 10.1089/heq.2020.0112. eCollection 2021.
Previous research has documented that Latinos report higher levels of stress than other ethnicities and are an increasing portion of the demographics of the United States. While there are many measures to assess stress and other stress-related conditions, there are no systematic reviews to date to assess whether the current measures of generalized stress are valid or reliable in Latinos in the United States. The purpose of this systematic review was to examine the current state of the literature assessing the psychometric properties in stress measures in this population. We used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to review the literature from January 1990 to May 2020 for studies, which measured the psychometric properties of scales measuring generalized stress in Latinos in the United States. Twelve studies measured the psychometric properties of eight scales of generalized stress. The 10-item Perceived Stress Scale, the Hispanic Stress Inventory, the Hispanic Women's Social Stressor Scale, and the Family Obligation Stress Scale show the strongest reliability and validity for measuring stress in Latinos in the United States. Most studies were done in traditional immigration destinations in the United States. While four scales which show acceptable reliability and validity for measuring stress in Latinos in the United States, continuing to develop and further validate these scales within Latino communities will be critical to understand and address Latino stress more comprehensively. Our findings can inform health research and clinical interventions for this at-risk community.
先前的研究表明,拉丁裔报告的压力水平高于其他种族,且在美国人口构成中所占比例日益增加。虽然有许多评估压力及其他与压力相关状况的方法,但迄今为止,尚无系统性综述来评估当前的一般压力测量方法在美国拉丁裔群体中是否有效或可靠。本系统性综述的目的是审视评估该人群压力测量心理测量特性的文献现状。我们使用系统综述与Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,对1990年1月至2020年5月间测量美国拉丁裔群体一般压力量表心理测量特性的研究文献进行综述。12项研究测量了8种一般压力量表的心理测量特性。10项感知压力量表、西班牙裔压力量表、西班牙裔女性社会压力源量表和家庭义务压力量表在测量美国拉丁裔群体的压力方面显示出最强的信度和效度。大多数研究在美国传统移民目的地进行。虽然有4种量表在美国拉丁裔群体压力测量方面显示出可接受的信度和效度,但在拉丁裔社区内持续开发并进一步验证这些量表对于更全面地理解和应对拉丁裔压力至关重要。我们的研究结果可为针对这个高危群体的健康研究和临床干预提供参考。