Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, D-1, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, 1100071, India.
Department of Clinical Research and Biostatistics, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, 110070, India.
Hepatol Int. 2021 Aug;15(4):983-994. doi: 10.1007/s12072-021-10164-z. Epub 2021 May 25.
Sepsis and septic shock are common causes of hospitalization and mortality in patients with cirrhosis. There is no data on the choice of fluid and resuscitation protocols in sepsis-induced hypotension in cirrhosis.
In this open-label trial conducted at a single center, we enrolled 308 cirrhotics with sepsis-induced hypotension and randomized them to receive either 5% albumin or normal saline. The primary endpoint was a reversal of hypotension [mean arterial pressure, MAP, ≥ 65 mmHg] at 3 h. Secondary endpoints included serial effects on heart rate, arterial lactate and urine output.
154 patients each received 5% albumin (males, 79.8%, mean MAP 52.9 ± 7.0 mm Hg) or 0.9% saline (85.1%, 53.4 ± 6.3 mm Hg) with comparable baseline parameters and liver disease severity. Reversal of hypotension was higher in patients receiving 5% albumin than saline at the end of one hour [25.3% and 11.7%, p = 0.03, Odds ratio (95% CI)-1.9 (1.08-3.42)] and at the end of three hours [11.7% and 3.2%, p = 0.008, 3.9 (1.42-10.9)]. Sustained reduction in heart rate and hyperlactatemia (p < 0.001) was better in the albumin group. At one week, the proportion of patients surviving was higher in the albumin group than those receiving saline (43.5% vs 38.3%, p = 0.03). Female gender and SOFA ≥ 11 were predictors of non-response to fluid.
5% human albumin is safe and beneficial in reversing sepsis-induced hypotension compared to normal saline in patients with cirrhosis improving clinically assessable parameters of systemic hemodynamics, tissue perfusion and in-hospital short-term survival of cirrhosis patients with sepsis.
脓毒症和感染性休克是肝硬化患者住院和死亡的常见原因。在肝硬化合并脓毒性低血压患者中,尚无关于液体选择和复苏方案的相关数据。
在单中心进行的这项开放标签试验中,我们纳入了 308 例合并脓毒性低血压的肝硬化患者,并将其随机分为接受 5%白蛋白或生理盐水治疗的两组。主要终点为 3 小时时低血压(平均动脉压,MAP,≥65mmHg)的逆转情况。次要终点包括对心率、动脉血乳酸和尿量的连续影响。
154 例患者分别接受了 5%白蛋白(男性,79.8%,平均 MAP 52.9±7.0mmHg)或 0.9%生理盐水(85.1%,53.4±6.3mmHg)治疗,两组患者的基线参数和肝脏疾病严重程度相当。在 1 小时时,接受白蛋白治疗的患者低血压逆转率高于接受生理盐水治疗的患者[25.3%和 11.7%,p=0.03,优势比(95%可信区间)-1.9(1.08-3.42)],在 3 小时时,逆转率分别为 11.7%和 3.2%,p=0.008,3.9(1.42-10.9)。白蛋白组的心率和高乳酸血症的持续降低情况更好(p<0.001)。在第 1 周时,白蛋白组的患者存活率高于生理盐水组[43.5% vs 38.3%,p=0.03]。女性和 SOFA≥11 是对液体治疗无反应的预测因素。
与生理盐水相比,5%人白蛋白在肝硬化合并脓毒性低血压患者中是安全且有益的,可改善全身血流动力学、组织灌注等临床可评估参数,并提高肝硬化合并脓毒症患者的住院短期生存率。