• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在台湾,不符合移植条件的多发性骨髓瘤患者的一线治疗的生存、医疗资源利用和支出。

Survival, health care resource utilization and expenditures of first-line treatments for multiple myeloma patients ineligible for transplant in Taiwan.

机构信息

Graduate Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 May 26;16(5):e0252124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252124. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0252124
PMID:34038463
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8153459/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We aimed to provide real-world information on survival, health care resource utilization (HCRU), and expenditures related to various first lines of therapy (1LOTs) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients who were transplant ineligible (TI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database (2008-2016), we identified 1,511 NDMM-TI patients who had received 1LOT since June 2012. We categorized 1LOT regimens into four groups: bortezomib (V)+thalidomide (T), V, T, and non-V/T. Patients' characteristics were collected. The overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), frequencies of HCRU (hospitalization, visiting outpatient and emergency departments), and related expenditures within one year after commencement of the 1LOT were evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

The mean age of the included patients was 71.3 (SD 10.7) years, and 40.4% of patients had a CCI score ≥3. Most patients (747; 49.4%) were in the V+T group and, after adjusting for covariates, had a significantly longer OS (median, 22.2 months) and EFS (9.1 months) than those in the T group (12.6 and 4.5 months, respectively) and the non-V/T group (12.2 and 3.2 months, respectively), but they were mostly comparable with patients in the V group (23.8 and 6.6 months, respectively). Compared to those in the V+T group, patients in the T and non-V/T groups had 29% and 39% fewer outpatient visits and 15% and 24% lower total expenditure, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our real-world data consolidate evidence for the effectiveness of bortezomib-containing regimens as the 1LOT in NDMM-TI patients at the expense of more outpatient visits and higher total costs.

摘要

背景

我们旨在提供关于不适合移植(TI)的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤(NDMM)患者接受一线治疗(1LOT)的生存、医疗资源利用(HCRU)和支出的真实世界信息。

方法

我们从台湾全民健康保险数据库(2008-2016 年)中确定了 1511 名自 2012 年 6 月以来接受过 1LOT 的 NDMM-TI 患者。我们将 1LOT 方案分为四组:硼替佐米(V)+沙利度胺(T)、V、T 和非 V/T。收集患者特征。评估并比较了 1LOT 开始后一年内的总生存率(OS)、无事件生存率(EFS)、HCRU(住院、门诊和急诊就诊)频率以及相关支出。

结果

纳入患者的平均年龄为 71.3(10.7)岁,40.4%的患者 CCI 评分≥3。大多数患者(747 人;49.4%)在 V+T 组中,调整协变量后,OS(中位 22.2 个月)和 EFS(9.1 个月)明显长于 T 组(分别为 12.6 和 4.5 个月)和非 V/T 组(分别为 12.2 和 3.2 个月),但与 V 组患者(分别为 23.8 和 6.6 个月)基本相似。与 V+T 组相比,T 组和非 V/T 组患者的门诊就诊次数分别减少了 29%和 39%,总支出分别降低了 15%和 24%。

结论

我们的真实世界数据证实,硼替佐米联合方案作为 NDMM-TI 患者的一线治疗方案是有效的,但会增加门诊就诊次数和总费用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5517/8153459/f802a0a185ef/pone.0252124.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5517/8153459/d086e457244f/pone.0252124.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5517/8153459/8c88cfafcedc/pone.0252124.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5517/8153459/f802a0a185ef/pone.0252124.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5517/8153459/d086e457244f/pone.0252124.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5517/8153459/8c88cfafcedc/pone.0252124.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5517/8153459/f802a0a185ef/pone.0252124.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Survival, health care resource utilization and expenditures of first-line treatments for multiple myeloma patients ineligible for transplant in Taiwan.在台湾,不符合移植条件的多发性骨髓瘤患者的一线治疗的生存、医疗资源利用和支出。
PLoS One. 2021 May 26;16(5):e0252124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252124. eCollection 2021.
2
Treatment Patterns and Clinical and Economic Outcomes in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Treated With Lenalidomide- and/or Bortezomib-containing Regimens Without Stem Cell Transplant in a Real-world Setting.在真实环境中,未接受干细胞移植的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤患者接受来那度胺和/或硼替佐米为基础的方案治疗的治疗模式及临床和经济结局。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019 Oct;19(10):645-655. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
3
Real-world analysis of patient characteristics, treatment outcomes, and healthcare resource utilization across Europe in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma ineligible for stem cell transplantation who received lenalidomide- or bortezomib-based regimens.在不符合干细胞移植条件的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤患者中,接受来那度胺或硼替佐米为基础的治疗方案的患者,在欧洲进行真实世界的患者特征、治疗结局和医疗资源利用情况分析。
Leuk Lymphoma. 2021 Oct;62(10):2492-2501. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2021.1924369. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
4
Bortezomib and Thalidomide Treatment Results in Newly Diagnosed Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma Patients are Comparable in Long-Term Follow-Up.硼替佐米与沙利度胺治疗新诊断的不适于移植的多发性骨髓瘤患者的长期随访结果具有可比性。
Klin Onkol. 2019 Fall;32(6):445-452. doi: 10.14735/amko2019445.
5
Bortezomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma without intent for immediate autologous stem-cell transplant (SWOG S0777): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.硼替佐米联合来那度胺和地塞米松与单纯来那度胺和地塞米松治疗新诊断的无立即自体干细胞移植意向的骨髓瘤患者(SWOG S0777):一项随机、开放标签的3期试验
Lancet. 2017 Feb 4;389(10068):519-527. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31594-X. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
6
Patterns of total cost and economic consequences of progression for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.新诊断多发性骨髓瘤患者的总费用模式及疾病进展的经济后果
Curr Med Res Opin. 2015 Jun;31(6):1105-15. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1031732. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
7
A cost-effectiveness analysis of real-world treatment for elderly patients with multiple myeloma using a full disease model.使用全疾病模型对老年多发性骨髓瘤患者的真实世界治疗进行成本效益分析。
Eur J Haematol. 2016 Feb;96(2):198-208. doi: 10.1111/ejh.12571. Epub 2015 May 7.
8
Analysis of the Efficacy of Thalidomide Plus Dexamethasone-Based Regimens in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Who Received Prior Chemotherapy, Including Bortezomib and Lenalidomide: KMM-166 Study.来那度胺联合地塞米松方案治疗硼替佐米和来那度胺治疗后复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者的疗效分析:KMM-166 研究。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2020 Feb;20(2):e97-e104. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2019.10.017. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
9
Treatment-free interval as an additional measure of efficacy in a large UK dataset of transplant ineligible myeloma patients.在英国一个大型不适合移植骨髓瘤患者的数据集里,无治疗间期作为额外的疗效衡量指标。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 21;15(2):e0229469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229469. eCollection 2020.
10
Daratumumab Plus Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone Versus Standard of Care in Latin America for Transplant-Ineligible Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Propensity Score Matching Analysis.达雷妥尤单抗联合硼替佐米、美法仑和泼尼松与新诊断不适合移植的多发性骨髓瘤拉丁美洲的标准治疗的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Adv Ther. 2020 Dec;37(12):4996-5009. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01521-9. Epub 2020 Oct 16.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review on the epidemiology and treatment options of multiple Myeloma in Asia.关于亚洲多发性骨髓瘤流行病学及治疗选择的系统评价。
Heliyon. 2024 Oct 22;10(21):e39698. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39698. eCollection 2024 Nov 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment evolution and improved survival in multiple myeloma in Taiwan.台湾多发性骨髓瘤的治疗演变和生存改善。
Ann Hematol. 2020 Feb;99(2):321-330. doi: 10.1007/s00277-019-03858-w. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
2
Utilization of novel systemic therapies for multiple myeloma: A retrospective study of front-line regimens using the SEER-Medicare data.新型系统性疗法在多发性骨髓瘤中的应用:利用 SEER-医疗保险数据进行的一线方案回顾性研究。
Cancer Med. 2020 Jan;9(2):626-639. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2698. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
3
Clinical outcomes with fixed-duration therapy (UK real-world data) compared with continuous lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone therapy (FIRST trial; MM-020) for transplant-ineligible patients with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma.
固定疗程疗法(英国真实世界数据)与来那度胺持续治疗及低剂量地塞米松疗法(FIRST试验;MM-020)对新诊断的不适于移植的多发性骨髓瘤患者的临床结局比较
Leuk Lymphoma. 2020 Mar;61(3):732-736. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2019.1683737. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
4
Long-term Outcomes in Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Retrospective Analysis of the Dutch Population-based HAematological Registry for Observational Studies (PHAROS).多发性骨髓瘤患者的长期预后:基于荷兰人群的血液学观察性研究登记系统(PHAROS)的回顾性分析
Hemasphere. 2018 May 4;2(4):e45. doi: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000045. eCollection 2018 Aug.
5
Randomized Clinical Trial Representativeness and Outcomes in Real-World Patients: Comparison of 6 Hallmark Randomized Clinical Trials of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.真实世界患者中随机临床试验的代表性和结局:6 项复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤标志性随机临床试验的比较。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2020 Jan;20(1):8-17.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2019.09.625. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
6
Treatment Patterns and Clinical and Economic Outcomes in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Treated With Lenalidomide- and/or Bortezomib-containing Regimens Without Stem Cell Transplant in a Real-world Setting.在真实环境中,未接受干细胞移植的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤患者接受来那度胺和/或硼替佐米为基础的方案治疗的治疗模式及临床和经济结局。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019 Oct;19(10):645-655. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
7
Frontline treatment of elderly non transplant-eligible multiple myeloma patients using CyBorD with or without thalidomide-based consolidation: a retrospective multi-centre analysis of real-world data.采用 CyBorD 联合或不联合沙利度胺进行巩固治疗,治疗不适合移植的老年多发性骨髓瘤患者的一线治疗:真实世界数据的回顾性多中心分析。
Br J Haematol. 2019 Nov;187(4):470-477. doi: 10.1111/bjh.16095. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
8
Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database: past and future.台湾全民健康保险研究数据库:过去与未来。
Clin Epidemiol. 2019 May 3;11:349-358. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S196293. eCollection 2019.
9
INSIGHT MM: a large, global, prospective, non-interventional, real-world study of patients with multiple myeloma.INSIGHT MM:一项大型、全球性、前瞻性、非干预性、真实世界的多发性骨髓瘤患者研究。
Future Oncol. 2019 May;15(13):1411-1428. doi: 10.2217/fon-2019-0013. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
10
Validating an algorithm for multiple myeloma based on administrative data using a SEER tumor registry and medical record review.基于 SEER 肿瘤登记和病历回顾利用行政数据验证多发性骨髓瘤算法。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019 Feb;28(2):256-263. doi: 10.1002/pds.4711. Epub 2019 Feb 4.