• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过尿可替宁和吸烟强度指数评估吸烟者、电子烟使用者及双重使用者的尼古丁依赖:一项利用韩国国家健康与营养检查调查数据的横断面研究

Nicotine Dependence Evaluated by Urinary Cotinine and Heaviness of Smoking Index among Smokers, Vapers, and Dual Users: A Cross-Sectional Study Using the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data.

作者信息

Hwang Ju Sam, Lee Cheol Min, Lee Kiheon, Kim Choon-Young

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Family Medicine, Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Fam Med. 2021 May;42(3):197-203. doi: 10.4082/kjfm.20.0056. Epub 2021 May 20.

DOI:10.4082/kjfm.20.0056
PMID:34038987
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8164922/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many people use both combustible cigarette (CC) and electronic cigarette (EC). We compared nicotine dependence among CC, EC, and dual users using questionnaires and urinary cotinine levels.

METHODS

Data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2014-2017) databases were analyzed; 3,917 CC, EC, and dual users were administered the urinary cotinine test, and 1,045 current CC and dual users completed the Heaviness of Smoking Index (HSI) questionnaires. Weighted geometric means of urine cotinine levels were compared between exclusive CC, exclusive EC, and dual users. The distribution rate, based on time to first cigarette (TTFC), cigarettes per day (CPD), and the HSI was analyzed in two weighted groups, exclusive CC and dual users.

RESULTS

Among those who currently use any type of cigarette, 89.4%, 1.4%, and 9.2% were exclusive CC, exclusive EC, and dual users, respectively. Weighted geometric means of urine cotinine were highest in dual users (1,356.4 ng/mL), followed by exclusive CC (1,270.3 ng/mL), and exclusive EC (867.7 ng/mL) with significant differences between all three groups (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in CPD between exclusive CC and dual users (P=0.626). The proportion of TTFC ≤5 minutes was 21.5% and 29.5% in the two groups, respectively (P=0.010); however, HSI differences in the two groups was marginal (P=0.557).

CONCLUSION

In this study, the urinary cotinine value could distinguish the three groups, CC, EC, and dual users, but the questionnaire using HSI could not distinguish the three groups.

摘要

背景

许多人同时使用可燃香烟(CC)和电子烟(EC)。我们使用问卷和尿可替宁水平比较了CC使用者、EC使用者和双重使用者的尼古丁依赖情况。

方法

分析了韩国国家健康与营养检查调查(2014 - 2017年)数据库中的数据;对3917名CC使用者、EC使用者和双重使用者进行了尿可替宁检测,1045名当前的CC使用者和双重使用者完成了吸烟严重程度指数(HSI)问卷。比较了单纯CC使用者、单纯EC使用者和双重使用者之间尿可替宁水平的加权几何均值。在单纯CC使用者和双重使用者这两个加权组中,分析了基于首次吸烟时间(TTFC)、每日吸烟量(CPD)和HSI的分布率。

结果

在当前使用任何类型香烟的人群中,单纯CC使用者、单纯EC使用者和双重使用者分别占89.4%、1.4%和9.2%。双重使用者的尿可替宁加权几何均值最高(1356.4 ng/mL),其次是单纯CC使用者(1270.3 ng/mL),单纯EC使用者最低(867.7 ng/mL),三组之间存在显著差异(P<0.05)。单纯CC使用者和双重使用者之间的CPD无统计学显著差异(P = 0.626)。两组中TTFC≤5分钟的比例分别为21.5%和29.5%(P = 0.010);然而,两组之间的HSI差异不显著(P = 0.557)。

结论

在本研究中,尿可替宁值可以区分CC使用者、EC使用者和双重使用者这三组,但使用HSI的问卷无法区分这三组。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11c2/8164922/ebb423d50752/kjfm-20-0056f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11c2/8164922/e42576698210/kjfm-20-0056f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11c2/8164922/ebb423d50752/kjfm-20-0056f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11c2/8164922/e42576698210/kjfm-20-0056f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11c2/8164922/ebb423d50752/kjfm-20-0056f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Nicotine Dependence Evaluated by Urinary Cotinine and Heaviness of Smoking Index among Smokers, Vapers, and Dual Users: A Cross-Sectional Study Using the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data.通过尿可替宁和吸烟强度指数评估吸烟者、电子烟使用者及双重使用者的尼古丁依赖:一项利用韩国国家健康与营养检查调查数据的横断面研究
Korean J Fam Med. 2021 May;42(3):197-203. doi: 10.4082/kjfm.20.0056. Epub 2021 May 20.
2
Changes in dependence, withdrawal, and craving among adult smokers who switch to nicotine salt pod-based e-cigarettes.改用尼古丁盐弹状电子烟的成年吸烟者在依赖、戒断和渴望方面的变化。
Addiction. 2022 Jan;117(1):207-215. doi: 10.1111/add.15597. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
3
Comparison of e-cigarette use characteristics between exclusive e-cigarette users and dual e-cigarette and conventional cigarette users: an on-line survey in France.比较法国线上调查中,专电子烟使用者和同时使用电子烟和传统香烟的双重使用者的电子烟使用特点。
Addiction. 2019 Dec;114(12):2247-2251. doi: 10.1111/add.14780. Epub 2019 Sep 1.
4
Daily Cigarette Consumption and Urine Cotinine Level between Dual Users of Electronic and Conventional Cigarettes, and Cigarette-Only Users.每日吸烟量与电子烟和传统卷烟双重使用者及仅使用卷烟者的尿可替宁水平。
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2020 Jan-Mar;52(1):20-26. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2019.1706791. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
5
Nicotine Dependence among Adolescents Single and Dual Cigarette Users.青少年单一和双重香烟使用者的尼古丁依赖情况
Children (Basel). 2021 Feb 14;8(2):144. doi: 10.3390/children8020144.
6
Demographic Characteristics, Perinatal Smoking Patterns, and Risk for Neonatal Health Complications Among Pregnant Smokers in the United States Who Begin Using Electronic Cigarettes During Pregnancy: A Descriptive Study Using Population-Based Surveillance Data.美国孕妇人口特征、围产期吸烟模式以及孕期开始使用电子烟与新生儿健康并发症风险:基于人群监测数据的描述性研究。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 Oct 22;26(11):1455-1462. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae119.
7
Differences between the effects of conventional cigarettes, e-cigarettes and dual product use on urine cotinine levels.传统香烟、电子烟及双重产品使用对尿可替宁水平影响的差异。
Tob Induc Dis. 2019 Feb 18;17:12. doi: 10.18332/tid/100527. eCollection 2019.
8
Nicotine Dependence and Urinary Nicotine, Cotinine and Hydroxycotinine Levels in Daily Smokers.日常吸烟者的尼古丁依赖与尿中尼古丁、可替宁和羟基可替宁水平
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Sep;18(9):1813-9. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw099. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
9
Comparison of Nicotine Dependence and Biomarker Levels among Traditional Cigarette, Heat-Not-Burn Cigarette, and Liquid E-Cigarette Users: Results from the Think Study.传统香烟、加热不燃烧香烟和电子烟使用者的尼古丁依赖和生物标志物水平比较:来自 Think 研究的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 29;18(9):4777. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094777.
10
Time to first cigarette and serum cotinine levels in adolescent smokers: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2007-2010.青少年吸烟者首次吸烟时间和血清可替宁水平:2007-2010 年国家健康与营养调查。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Mar;15(3):701-7. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nts189. Epub 2012 Sep 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Protocol for the development of a vaping cessation intervention for young adult veterans.为年轻成年退伍军人制定戒烟干预措施的方案。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 May 17;39:101309. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101309. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Nicotine Dependence of Electronic Cigarette, Dual Combustible and Electronic Cigarette Users.电子烟、双重可燃烟草使用者及电子烟使用者的尼古丁依赖情况
Korean J Fam Med. 2021 May;42(3):189-190. doi: 10.4082/kjfm.42.3E. Epub 2021 May 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Differences between the effects of conventional cigarettes, e-cigarettes and dual product use on urine cotinine levels.传统香烟、电子烟及双重产品使用对尿可替宁水平影响的差异。
Tob Induc Dis. 2019 Feb 18;17:12. doi: 10.18332/tid/100527. eCollection 2019.
2
Dual Versus Never Use of E-Cigarettes Among American Indians Who Smoke.美国印第安烟民中电子烟的双重使用与从不使用。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Sep;57(3):e59-e68. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
3
E-Cigarettes are More Addictive than Traditional Cigarettes-A Study in Highly Educated Young People.
电子烟比传统香烟更具成瘾性——一项针对高学历年轻人的研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 27;16(13):2279. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132279.
4
Measuring e-cigarette addiction among adolescents.测量青少年电子烟成瘾情况。
Tob Control. 2020 May;29(3):258-262. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054900. Epub 2019 May 11.
5
How Does Smoking and Nicotine Dependence Change After Onset of Vaping? A Retrospective Analysis of Dual Users.吸烟和尼古丁依赖在开始使用电子烟后如何变化?双重使用者的回顾性分析。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Apr 21;22(5):764-770. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz043.
6
Polytobacco Use and Nicotine Dependence Symptoms Among US Adults, 2012-2014.美国成年人 2012-2014 年多烟草使用与尼古丁依赖症状。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 Aug 14;20(suppl_1):S88-S98. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty050.
7
Comparing cigarette and e-cigarette dependence and predicting frequency of smoking and e-cigarette use in dual-users of cigarettes and e-cigarettes.比较香烟和电子烟的依赖程度,并预测同时使用香烟和电子烟的双重使用者的吸烟和电子烟使用频率。
Addict Behav. 2018 Dec;87:92-96. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.06.027. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
8
A comparison of nicotine dependence among exclusive E-cigarette and cigarette users in the PATH study.《PATH 研究中电子烟和香烟单一使用者尼古丁依赖的比较》。
Prev Med. 2017 Nov;104:86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
9
Reasons for current E-cigarette use among U.S. adults.美国成年人当前使用电子烟的原因。
Prev Med. 2016 Dec;93:14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.09.011. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
10
Development of a questionnaire for assessing dependence on electronic cigarettes among a large sample of ex-smoking E-cigarette users.开发一份用于评估大量戒烟电子烟使用者对电子烟依赖程度的问卷。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Feb;17(2):186-92. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu204. Epub 2014 Oct 19.