Hwang Ju Sam, Lee Cheol Min, Lee Kiheon, Kim Choon-Young
Department of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Family Medicine, Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Korean J Fam Med. 2021 May;42(3):197-203. doi: 10.4082/kjfm.20.0056. Epub 2021 May 20.
Many people use both combustible cigarette (CC) and electronic cigarette (EC). We compared nicotine dependence among CC, EC, and dual users using questionnaires and urinary cotinine levels.
Data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2014-2017) databases were analyzed; 3,917 CC, EC, and dual users were administered the urinary cotinine test, and 1,045 current CC and dual users completed the Heaviness of Smoking Index (HSI) questionnaires. Weighted geometric means of urine cotinine levels were compared between exclusive CC, exclusive EC, and dual users. The distribution rate, based on time to first cigarette (TTFC), cigarettes per day (CPD), and the HSI was analyzed in two weighted groups, exclusive CC and dual users.
Among those who currently use any type of cigarette, 89.4%, 1.4%, and 9.2% were exclusive CC, exclusive EC, and dual users, respectively. Weighted geometric means of urine cotinine were highest in dual users (1,356.4 ng/mL), followed by exclusive CC (1,270.3 ng/mL), and exclusive EC (867.7 ng/mL) with significant differences between all three groups (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in CPD between exclusive CC and dual users (P=0.626). The proportion of TTFC ≤5 minutes was 21.5% and 29.5% in the two groups, respectively (P=0.010); however, HSI differences in the two groups was marginal (P=0.557).
In this study, the urinary cotinine value could distinguish the three groups, CC, EC, and dual users, but the questionnaire using HSI could not distinguish the three groups.
许多人同时使用可燃香烟(CC)和电子烟(EC)。我们使用问卷和尿可替宁水平比较了CC使用者、EC使用者和双重使用者的尼古丁依赖情况。
分析了韩国国家健康与营养检查调查(2014 - 2017年)数据库中的数据;对3917名CC使用者、EC使用者和双重使用者进行了尿可替宁检测,1045名当前的CC使用者和双重使用者完成了吸烟严重程度指数(HSI)问卷。比较了单纯CC使用者、单纯EC使用者和双重使用者之间尿可替宁水平的加权几何均值。在单纯CC使用者和双重使用者这两个加权组中,分析了基于首次吸烟时间(TTFC)、每日吸烟量(CPD)和HSI的分布率。
在当前使用任何类型香烟的人群中,单纯CC使用者、单纯EC使用者和双重使用者分别占89.4%、1.4%和9.2%。双重使用者的尿可替宁加权几何均值最高(1356.4 ng/mL),其次是单纯CC使用者(1270.3 ng/mL),单纯EC使用者最低(867.7 ng/mL),三组之间存在显著差异(P<0.05)。单纯CC使用者和双重使用者之间的CPD无统计学显著差异(P = 0.626)。两组中TTFC≤5分钟的比例分别为21.5%和29.5%(P = 0.010);然而,两组之间的HSI差异不显著(P = 0.557)。
在本研究中,尿可替宁值可以区分CC使用者、EC使用者和双重使用者这三组,但使用HSI的问卷无法区分这三组。