Department of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Epidemiology, Cherokee Nation, Tahlequah, Oklahoma.
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Sep;57(3):e59-e68. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
Many American Indian communities have a high prevalence of smoking and e-cigarette use, but factors associated with their dual use are rarely studied.
In 2016, a total of 375 American Indian adults who smoke completed paper surveys regarding cigarette and e-cigarette use and provided saliva for cotinine levels. In 2018, cross-sectional analyses were performed, comparing dual users (12%), defined as using e-cigarettes on some or every day for the past 30 days, with never users of e-cigarettes (37%).
Compared with never users, dual users were younger, more often reported history of depression (56% and 29%, respectively; p<0.01) and family history of smoking-related disease (77% and 59%, respectively; p<0.05), had lower harm perceptions of e-cigarettes (27% and 47%, respectively; p<0.01) or vapor (14% and 35%, respectively; p<0.01), and more often perceived e-cigarettes as cessation aids (75% and 16%, respectively; p<0.01) and as less harmful than cigarettes (70% and 17%, respectively; p<0.01). Dual users were less often uncertain/unknowing about e-cigarette benefits or harms (p<0.01) and more often reported likelihood to quit smoking (49% and 24%, respectively; p<0.01) and prior attempt to quit smoking, ever (89% and 67%, respectively; p<0.01) or in the past year (55% and 32%, respectively; p=0.01). Cigarette consumption and cotinine levels did not differ between groups. Dual users more often tried other nicotine products (p<0.02) and more often lived with a vaping partner/spouse (45% and 6%, respectively; p<0.01).
Dual users perceived e-cigarettes as less harmful than cigarettes and more as cessation aids than cigarette-only users did, but cigarette consumption did not differ between groups. Whether e-cigarettes will reduce smoking-related disparities among American Indian people remains undetermined.
许多美国印第安人社区的吸烟和电子烟使用率都很高,但很少有研究关注导致他们双重使用的因素。
2016 年,共有 375 名成年美国印第安烟民完成了关于香烟和电子烟使用情况的纸质调查,并提供了唾液用于检测可替宁水平。2018 年,进行了横断面分析,比较了双重使用者(12%)和从不使用电子烟者(37%)。
与从不使用电子烟者相比,双重使用者更年轻,更常报告有抑郁病史(分别为 56%和 29%;p<0.01)和家族吸烟相关疾病史(分别为 77%和 59%;p<0.05),对电子烟的危害感知较低(分别为 27%和 47%;p<0.01)或蒸汽(分别为 14%和 35%;p<0.01),更常将电子烟视为戒烟辅助工具(分别为 75%和 16%;p<0.01),并认为电子烟比香烟危害小(分别为 70%和 17%;p<0.01)。双重使用者对电子烟的好处或危害不确定/不知道的比例较低(p<0.01),更有可能戒烟(分别为 49%和 24%;p<0.01),且更有可能尝试戒烟(分别为 89%和 67%;p<0.01),或在过去一年中尝试戒烟(分别为 55%和 32%;p=0.01)。两组的香烟消耗量和可替宁水平没有差异。双重使用者更常尝试其他尼古丁产品(p<0.02),且更常与吸电子烟的伴侣/配偶同住(分别为 45%和 6%;p<0.01)。
双重使用者认为电子烟比香烟危害小,更认为电子烟是戒烟辅助工具,而不是像只吸香烟的使用者那样认为,两组的香烟消耗量没有差异。电子烟是否会减少美国印第安人群体中的吸烟相关差异仍未确定。