• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症老年人的尊严:范围综述。

The dignity of older individuals with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias: A scoping review.

机构信息

College of Nursing, 14707University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA.

出版信息

Dementia (London). 2021 Nov;20(8):2891-2915. doi: 10.1177/14713012211021722. Epub 2021 May 27.

DOI:10.1177/14713012211021722
PMID:34039079
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Supporting human dignity is the essence of delivery of care. Dignity is one's sense of self-value that is influenced by the perceived value attributed to the individual from others. Individuals with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) are at risk of violations of their dignity, due to their diminished autonomy, the alteration in their sense of self, the loss of meaningful social roles, and their limited interactions with peers and confirmation of identity.

OBJECTIVES

A scoping review was conducted to explore the state of art regarding the dignity of individuals with ADRD. Methods: A search was conducted using CINAHL, PubMed, Web of Science, and PsycINFO. Relevant articles were analyzed and organized based on the themes they addressed, and a narrative description of findings was presented.

RESULTS

Twenty-six articles were included in the review. Findings highlighted characteristics of care that affected the dignity of these individuals. Researchers found that care was task-centered, depersonalized, and lacked a genuine connection. Individuals with ADRD experienced embarrassment, lack of freedom, and powerlessness, which contributed to feelings of being devalued, and threatened their dignity. Studies testing interventions to enhance dignity were either inconclusive, lacked rigor, or had no lasting effect. Conclusion: The dignity of individuals with ADRD may be violated during healthcare interactions. More research is needed to objectively measure the dignity of these individuals and examine the effectiveness of interventions aimed at promoting dignity.

摘要

背景

维护人的尊严是提供护理的核心。尊严是一个人对自我价值的认知,受到他人对个体赋予的价值的影响。患有阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症(ADRD)的个体由于自主能力下降、自我意识改变、丧失有意义的社会角色以及与同龄人互动受限和身份认同受到限制,其尊严可能受到侵犯。

目的

本研究进行了范围综述,以探讨有关 ADRD 个体尊严的现状。方法:使用 CINAHL、PubMed、Web of Science 和 PsycINFO 进行了检索。根据文章所涉及的主题对相关文章进行了分析和组织,并呈现了发现的叙述性描述。

结果

综述共纳入了 26 篇文章。研究结果强调了影响这些个体尊严的护理特征。研究人员发现,护理以任务为中心、缺乏人性化,且缺乏真诚的联系。ADRD 个体经历了尴尬、缺乏自由和无力感,这些都导致了他们被贬低的感觉,威胁到了他们的尊严。测试旨在增强尊严的干预措施的研究结果要么不确定,要么缺乏严谨性,要么没有持久效果。

结论

在医疗保健互动中,ADRD 个体的尊严可能受到侵犯。需要进一步研究来客观衡量这些个体的尊严,并研究旨在促进尊严的干预措施的有效性。

相似文献

1
The dignity of older individuals with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias: A scoping review.阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症老年人的尊严:范围综述。
Dementia (London). 2021 Nov;20(8):2891-2915. doi: 10.1177/14713012211021722. Epub 2021 May 27.
2
Dignity in people with dementia: A concept analysis.痴呆患者的尊严:概念分析。
Nurs Ethics. 2024 Nov;31(7):1220-1232. doi: 10.1177/09697330241262469. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
3
Technology for activity participation in older people with mild cognitive impairment or dementia: expert perspectives and a scoping review.针对轻度认知障碍或痴呆老年人的活动参与技术:专家观点和范围综述。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 Nov;18(8):1555-1576. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2022.2116114. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
4
Knowledge, perceptions, and feelings associated with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias: a qualitative study among middle-aged latinas residing in an underserved agricultural community in California.与阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症相关的知识、认知和感受:在加利福尼亚一个服务不足的农业社区中居住的中年拉丁裔人群中的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 17;24(1):2865. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20195-4.
5
Dementia in the incarcerated population: a retrospective study using the South Carolina Alzheimer's disease registry, USA.监禁人群中的痴呆症:一项使用美国南卡罗来纳州阿尔茨海默病登记处的回顾性研究。
Int J Prison Health. 2023 Mar 16;19(1):109-124. doi: 10.1108/IJPH-08-2021-0071. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
6
Alzheimer's Disease-Related Dementias Summit 2022: National Research Priorities for the Investigation of Post-Traumatic Brain Injury Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias.2022 年阿尔茨海默病相关痴呆峰会:创伤性脑损伤后阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症研究的国家重点。
J Neurotrauma. 2023 Aug;40(15-16):1512-1523. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0514. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
7
Considerate mHealth design for older adults with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD): A scoping review on usability barriers and design suggestions.考虑周到的移动医疗(mHealth)设计对患有老年痴呆症和相关痴呆症(ADRD)的老年人:可用性障碍和设计建议的范围综述。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Aug;152:104494. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104494. Epub 2021 May 12.
8
A Scoping Review of Physical Performance Outcome Measures Used in Exercise Interventions for Older Adults With Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias.阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆老年人运动干预中使用的身体表现结果测量的范围综述。
J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2019 Jan/Mar;42(1):28-47. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000159.
9
Determinants of dementia diagnosis in U.S. primary care in the past decade: A scoping review.过去十年美国初级保健中痴呆症诊断的决定因素:一项范围综述。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2025 Feb;12(2):100035. doi: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2024.100035. Epub 2025 Jan 1.
10
Diabetes-Related Topics in an Online Forum for Caregivers of Individuals Living With Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias: Qualitative Inquiry.针对阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症患者照料者的在线论坛中与糖尿病相关的话题:定性调查
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 6;22(7):e17851. doi: 10.2196/17851.

引用本文的文献

1
Dignity-Preserving Dementia Care in Old Age Homes in Nepal: Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives.尼泊尔养老院中维护尊严的痴呆症护理:医疗保健专业人员的观点
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2025 Aug 27;12:23333936251369444. doi: 10.1177/23333936251369444. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Effective for Whom? A Review of Psychological and Social Intervention Recommendations in European Dementia Care Guidelines Through the Lenses of Social Health and Intersectionality.对谁有效?从社会健康和交叉性视角审视欧洲痴呆症护理指南中的心理和社会干预建议
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Apr 2;15(4):457. doi: 10.3390/bs15040457.
3
From the Perspective of People with Dementia: Using Creative Qualitative Measures to Assess the Values and Opinions on Freedom and Safety among People Living with Dementia.
从痴呆症患者的角度:运用创新性定性方法评估痴呆症患者对自由与安全的价值观和看法。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jul 15;12(14):1412. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12141412.
4
Efficacy of COMPAs, an App Designed to Support Communication Between Persons Living With Dementia in Long-Term Care Settings and Their Caregivers: Mixed Methods Implementation Study.用于支持长期护理环境中痴呆症患者及其照护者之间沟通的 COMPAs 应用程序的疗效:混合方法实施研究。
JMIR Aging. 2024 Jul 4;7:e47565. doi: 10.2196/47565.
5
Management of Agitation in Behaviours That Challenge in Dementia Care: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Non-Pharmacological Strategies.痴呆症护理中行为挑战的激越管理:非药物策略的多学科视角。
Clin Interv Aging. 2023 Feb 18;18:219-230. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S399697. eCollection 2023.
6
Nursing Staff Perceptions of Outcomes Related to Honoring Residents' "Risky" Preferences.护理人员对尊重居民“冒险”偏好相关结果的看法。
Res Gerontol Nurs. 2022 Nov-Dec;15(6):271-281. doi: 10.3928/19404921-20220930-01. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
7
Experiences with dignity among older people confined to beds living in a nursing home: A qualitative descriptive study.养老院中卧床不起的老年人的尊严体验:一项定性描述性研究。
J Nurs Manag. 2022 Oct;30(7):2362-2369. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13689. Epub 2022 Jun 5.