• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从痴呆症患者的角度:运用创新性定性方法评估痴呆症患者对自由与安全的价值观和看法。

From the Perspective of People with Dementia: Using Creative Qualitative Measures to Assess the Values and Opinions on Freedom and Safety among People Living with Dementia.

作者信息

van Andel Steven, Holkenborg Anouk

机构信息

IJsselheem, Engelenbergplantsoen 3, 8266 AB Kampen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jul 15;12(14):1412. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12141412.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare12141412
PMID:39057555
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11276790/
Abstract

With the growing numbers of people living in old age, a system that sustains autonomy, dignity and freedom of movement for people living with dementia (PwD) needs to be installed. However, due to the cognitive constraints in the cohort of PwD, traditional qualitative methods of inquiry, such as interviews, are often not a good match. This study aimed to use creative qualitative assessment tools to assess the values and opinions of PwD in nursing homes on freedom and safety. Twenty-two nursing home residents with memory problems participated in this study. Important themes related to freedom and safety were identified using a diverse set of methodologies. Overall, residents had a similar view on 'safety', relating this to having a homely environment where people look out for you, with a good balance between busy and quiet areas and being able to retain cognitive and physical function. Values around freedom were more diverse. Residents who were still capable of logical speech generally voiced a wish for independence, making one's own decisions and wanting to go outside. For residents who no longer spoke, freedom seemed to be experienced more through the connection to other people. These results show that PwD still have distinct personal values concerning freedom and safety, which should be given due consideration in decision-making regarding nursing home policy, thereby potentially improving the quality of life of PwD.

摘要

随着老年人口数量的不断增加,需要建立一个能维持痴呆症患者自主性、尊严和行动自由的体系。然而,由于痴呆症患者群体存在认知限制,传统的定性研究方法,如访谈,往往不太适用。本研究旨在使用创新性定性评估工具,评估养老院中痴呆症患者对自由和安全的价值观及看法。22名有记忆问题的养老院居民参与了本研究。通过多种方法确定了与自由和安全相关的重要主题。总体而言,居民们对“安全”的看法相似,将其与拥有一个人们相互照顾的家庭式环境、繁忙与安静区域的良好平衡以及能够保持认知和身体功能联系起来。关于自由的价值观则更为多样。仍能进行逻辑言语表达的居民普遍表达了对独立、自己做决定以及外出的渴望。对于不再说话的居民来说,自由似乎更多地是通过与他人的联系来体验。这些结果表明,痴呆症患者在自由和安全方面仍有独特的个人价值观,在制定养老院政策的决策过程中应予以充分考虑,从而有可能提高痴呆症患者的生活质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca2a/11276790/923d26955eeb/healthcare-12-01412-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca2a/11276790/923d26955eeb/healthcare-12-01412-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca2a/11276790/923d26955eeb/healthcare-12-01412-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
From the Perspective of People with Dementia: Using Creative Qualitative Measures to Assess the Values and Opinions on Freedom and Safety among People Living with Dementia.从痴呆症患者的角度:运用创新性定性方法评估痴呆症患者对自由与安全的价值观和看法。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jul 15;12(14):1412. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12141412.
2
A group intervention to improve quality of life for people with advanced dementia living in care homes: the Namaste feasibility cluster RCT.一项改善养老院中晚期痴呆症患者生活质量的团体干预措施:Namaste 可行性聚类 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jan;24(6):1-140. doi: 10.3310/hta24060.
3
Tension between freedom and dependence-A challenge for residents who live in nursing homes.养老院居民的自由与依赖之间的紧张关系:一个挑战。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Nov;27(21-22):4119-4127. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14561. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
4
What matters to you when the nursing is your home: a qualitative study on the views of residents with dementia living in nursing homes.当护理成为你的家时,对你来说重要的是什么:居住在养老院的痴呆症患者的观点的定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Jun 29;20(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01612-w.
5
'What matters to you?'-a qualitative study on the views of nursing home residents with dementia regarding the health care they receive.“对你来说什么最重要?”-一项关于痴呆养老院居民对其接受的医疗保健看法的定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2022 Jan;31(1-2):262-274. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15904. Epub 2021 Jun 6.
6
Good care in group home living for people with dementia. Experiences of residents, family and nursing staff.群居型护理之家对痴呆患者的精心照护:居民、家属和护理人员的体验。
J Clin Nurs. 2011 Sep;20(17-18):2490-500. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03759.x. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
7
Unique Care Needs of People with Dementia and Their Caregivers during Transitions from Skilled Nursing Facilities to Home and Assisted Living: A Qualitative Study.痴呆症患者及其照料者在从熟练护理设施过渡到家庭和辅助生活中的独特护理需求:一项定性研究。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Sep;23(9):1486-1491. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.06.021. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
8
The Perspective of Residents Living With Dementia Toward Their Built Environment: A Walking Interview Study in German Nursing Homes.痴呆症患者对其居住环境的看法:德国养老院的步行访谈研究
Innov Aging. 2024 Jun 17;8(7):igae058. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igae058. eCollection 2024.
9
Non-benzodiazepine hypnotic use for sleep disturbance in people aged over 55 years living with dementia: a series of cohort studies.用于 55 岁以上患有痴呆症的人群睡眠障碍的非苯二氮䓬类催眠药物使用:一系列队列研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Jan;25(1):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta25010.
10
Dignity and the challenge of dying in nursing homes: the residents' view.养老院中的尊严与临终挑战:居民视角
Age Ageing. 2007 Mar;36(2):197-202. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afl152. Epub 2007 Jan 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Supporting autonomy for people with dementia living in nursing homes: A rapid realist review.支持居住在养老院中的痴呆症患者的自主权:快速务实综述。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2023 Jan;137:104382. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104382. Epub 2022 Oct 24.
2
Influence of Freedom of Movement on the Health of People With Dementia: A Systematic Review.自由活动对痴呆症患者健康的影响:系统评价。
Gerontologist. 2023 Sep 2;63(8):1351-1364. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac114.
3
How Effective are Pictures in Eliciting Information from People Living with Dementia? A Systematic Review.
图片在诱发痴呆症患者信息方面的效果如何?系统评价。
Clin Gerontol. 2023 Jul-Sep;46(4):511-524. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2022.2085643. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
4
Wearable and Portable GPS Solutions for Monitoring Mobility in Dementia: A Systematic Review.可穿戴式和便携式 GPS 解决方案在痴呆症患者移动监测中的应用:系统评价。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Apr 27;22(9):3336. doi: 10.3390/s22093336.
5
The dignity of older individuals with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias: A scoping review.阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症老年人的尊严:范围综述。
Dementia (London). 2021 Nov;20(8):2891-2915. doi: 10.1177/14713012211021722. Epub 2021 May 27.
6
Electronic tracking devices in dementia care: A systematic review of argument-based ethics literature.电子追踪设备在痴呆症护理中的应用:基于论据的伦理学文献的系统评价。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2021 Jul-Aug;95:104419. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2021.104419. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
7
How Important Are Choice, Autonomy, and Relationships in Predicting the Quality of Life of Nursing Home Residents?选择、自主和关系对预测养老院居民生活质量有多重要?
J Appl Gerontol. 2021 Dec;40(12):1743-1750. doi: 10.1177/0733464820983972. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
8
How to use and assess qualitative research methods.如何使用和评估定性研究方法。
Neurol Res Pract. 2020 May 27;2:14. doi: 10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z. eCollection 2020.
9
Personhood and Dementia Care: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis of the Perspectives of People With Dementia.人格与痴呆症护理:痴呆症患者观点的定性证据综合
Gerontologist. 2021 Apr 3;61(3):e85-e100. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz159.
10
The perceived and observed needs of patients with dementia admitted to acute medical wards.入住急性内科病房的痴呆症患者的感知需求和观察到的需求。
Dementia (London). 2020 Aug;19(6):1997-2017. doi: 10.1177/1471301218814383. Epub 2018 Nov 27.