Brunet-Gouet Eric, Decaix-Tisserand Capucine, Urbach Mathieu, Bazin Nadine, Aouizerate Bruno, Brunel Lore, Capdevielle Delphine, Chereau Isabelle, Dubertret Caroline, Dubreucq Julien, Fond Guillaume, Lançon Christophe, Leignier Sylvain, Mallet Jasmina, Misdrahi David, Pires Sylvie, Schneider Priscille, Schurhoff Franck, Yazbek Hanan, Zinetti-Bertschy Anna, Passerieux Christine, Roux Paul
FondaMental Foundation, Créteil, France.
Department of Adult Psychiatry, Centre Hospitalier de Versailles, Le Chesnay, France.
NPJ Schizophr. 2021 May 26;7(1):30. doi: 10.1038/s41537-021-00160-5.
The interest in social cognition in schizophrenia is justified by the relationship between deficits in these skills and negative functional outcomes. Although assessment batteries have already been described, there is no consensus about which measures are useful in predicting patient functioning or quality of life (QoL). We investigated a set of five measures of recognition of facial emotions, theory of mind (ToM), and empathy in a cohort of 143 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder at inclusion and, amongst whom 79 were reassessed 1 year later. The distribution was satisfactory for the TREF (Facial Emotion Recognition Task), V-SIR (Versailles-Situational Intention Reading), and QCAE (Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy). Internal consistency was satisfactory for the TREF, V-SIR, V-Comics (Versailles Intention Attribution Task), and QCAE. Sensitivity to change was acceptable for the TREF. The TREF and V-SIR showed a cross-sectional relationship with functioning beyond the clinical symptoms of schizophrenia but not beyond neurocognition. Moreover, the TREF and V-SIR at inclusion could not predict functioning one year later, whereas most neurocognitive and clinical dimensions at inclusion could. Finally, only affective QCAE showed a significant cross-sectional, but not longitudinal, association with QoL. In conclusion, the TREF had satisfactory psychometric properties and showed a cross-sectional, but not longitudinal, association with objective outcome measures, thus appearing to be reliable in clinical practice and research. The V-SIR also showed promising psychometric properties, despite a possible weakness to detect change. However, these measures should be interpreted within the context of the good predictive power of the neurocognitive and clinical status on the outcome.
精神分裂症患者社交认知方面的研究兴趣源于这些技能缺陷与负面功能结果之间的关系。尽管已经介绍了评估量表,但对于哪些测量方法有助于预测患者的功能或生活质量(QoL),尚无共识。我们在一组143例精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍患者纳入研究时,对其面部情绪识别、心理理论(ToM)和共情的五项测量方法进行了调查,其中79例患者在1年后进行了重新评估。TREF(面部情绪识别任务)、V-SIR(凡尔赛情景意图解读)和QCAE(认知与情感共情问卷)的分布情况令人满意。TREF、V-SIR、V-Comics(凡尔赛意图归因任务)和QCAE的内部一致性令人满意。TREF对变化的敏感性是可接受的。TREF和V-SIR显示出与精神分裂症临床症状之外的功能存在横断面关系,但与神经认知无关。此外,纳入研究时的TREF和V-SIR无法预测1年后的功能,而纳入研究时的大多数神经认知和临床维度则可以。最后,只有情感QCAE与生活质量显示出显著的横断面关联,但无纵向关联。总之,TREF具有令人满意的心理测量学特性,与客观结果测量显示出横断面关联,但无纵向关联,因此在临床实践和研究中似乎是可靠的。尽管V-SIR在检测变化方面可能存在弱点,但也显示出有前景的心理测量学特性。然而,这些测量方法应在神经认知和临床状态对结果具有良好预测能力的背景下进行解释。