Zhu Shimin, Ni Shiguang, Hamilton Kyra
Department of Applied Social Sciences, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Department of Psychology, Tsinghua University, China.
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2020 Aug 17;8(1):349-361. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2020.1806717.
The well-being of migrant youth is a major global public health concern. This developmental stage is fraught with many challenges, with migrant youth suffering additional challenges as a result of migration. One avenue to better understand the psychological mechanisms that underpin the well-being of migrant youth is examining how mindsets - or about the malleability of human characteristics - affect well-being. The aim of the current study was to test a conceptual model in which cognition malleability belief on well-being would be mediated by emotion regulation styles in two samples of migrant youth using two different measures of well-being. In Study 1, mainland China migrant youth ( = 735, Mean age = 13.89, SD = 1.23) completed a survey measuring demographics and cognition malleability belief, emotion regulation style (cognitive reappraisal, expressive suppression), and well-being (holistic well-being). In Study 2, Hong Kong migrant youth (= 285, Mean age = 15.09, SD = 2.75) completed the same measures; however, well-being was assessed by the Life Satisfaction Scale. As different measures of the dependent variable (well-being) were used, two separate models were specified. Computations were performed with SPSS 22 and with the PROCESS macro. Both studies demonstrated support for the conceptual model. As predicted, cognition malleability belief was associated with cognitive reappraisal, expressive suppression, and well-being of migrant youth from mainland China and Hong Kong. Cognitive reappraisal was positively associated with well-being, while expressive suppression was not significantly associated with well-being. The association between cognition malleability belief and well-being was mediated by cognitive reappraisal. Current findings provide avenues for future longitudinal and experimental research to test the efficacy of these mechanisms in changing beliefs about cognition malleability to promote the well-being of migrant youth.
流动青少年的福祉是全球主要的公共卫生问题。这一发展阶段充满了许多挑战,而流动青少年由于迁移还面临着额外的挑战。更好地理解支撑流动青少年福祉的心理机制的一个途径是研究思维模式——即关于人类特征可塑性的信念——如何影响福祉。本研究的目的是在两个流动青少年样本中,使用两种不同的福祉测量方法,检验一个概念模型,即认知可塑性信念对福祉的影响将通过情绪调节方式来介导。在研究1中,中国大陆流动青少年(n = 735,平均年龄 = 13.89,标准差 = 1.23)完成了一项调查,测量人口统计学特征、认知可塑性信念、情绪调节方式(认知重评、表达抑制)和福祉(整体幸福感)。在研究2中,香港流动青少年(n = 285,平均年龄 = 15.09,标准差 = 2.75)完成了相同的测量;然而,福祉是通过生活满意度量表来评估的。由于使用了不同的因变量(福祉)测量方法,因此指定了两个独立的模型。使用SPSS 22和PROCESS宏进行计算。两项研究都为该概念模型提供了支持。正如预测的那样,认知可塑性信念与中国大陆和香港流动青少年的认知重评、表达抑制和福祉相关。认知重评与福祉呈正相关,而表达抑制与福祉无显著相关。认知可塑性信念与福祉之间的关联通过认知重评来介导。目前的研究结果为未来的纵向和实验研究提供了途径,以检验这些机制在改变认知可塑性信念以促进流动青少年福祉方面的有效性。