Giubilini Alberto, Savulescu Julian
Moral Philos Politics. 2019;6(1):65-87. doi: 10.1515/mopp-2018-0057. Epub 2019 May 1.
Public health policies often require individuals to make personal sacrifices for the sake of protecting other individuals or the community at large. Such requirements can be more or less demanding for individuals. This paper examines the implications of demandingness for public health ethics and policy. It focuses on three possible public health policies that pose requirements that are differently demanding: vaccination policies, policy to contain antimicrobial resistance, and quarantine and isolation policies. Assuming the validity of the 'demandingness objection' in ethics, we argue that states should try to pose requirements that individuals would have an independent moral obligation to fulfil, and therefore that are not too demanding. In such cases, coercive measures are ethically justified, especially if the interventions also entail some benefits to the individuals; this is, for example, the case of vaccination policies. When public health policies need to require individuals to do something that is too demanding to constitute an independent moral obligation, states have an obligation to either provide incentives to give individuals non-moral reasons to fulfil a certain requirement - as in the case of policies that limit antibiotic prescriptions - or to compensate individuals for being forced to do something that is too demanding to constitute an independent moral obligation - as in the case of quarantine and isolation policies.
公共卫生政策常常要求个人为了保护其他个人或整个社区而做出个人牺牲。此类要求对个人的苛刻程度可能有高有低。本文探讨了苛刻程度对公共卫生伦理和政策的影响。它聚焦于三种可能提出不同苛刻要求的公共卫生政策:疫苗接种政策、控制抗菌素耐药性的政策以及检疫和隔离政策。假设伦理学中“苛刻性异议”的有效性,我们认为国家应尽量提出个人本来就有独立道德义务去履行的要求,因此这些要求不会过于苛刻。在这种情况下,强制措施在伦理上是合理的,特别是如果干预措施也给个人带来一些益处时;例如疫苗接种政策就是这种情况。当公共卫生政策需要要求个人去做过于苛刻以至于不构成独立道德义务的事情时,国家有义务要么提供激励措施,给个人非道德理由去履行特定要求——如限制抗生素处方的政策那样,要么补偿个人因被迫去做过于苛刻以至于不构成独立道德义务的事情——如检疫和隔离政策那样。