• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国如何使用含糖饮料税收入。

How sugar-sweetened beverage tax revenues are being used in the United States.

作者信息

Krieger James, Magee Kiran, Hennings Tayler, Schoof John, Madsen Kristine A

机构信息

University of Washington, Department of Health Services, USA.

Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, USA.

出版信息

Prev Med Rep. 2021 Apr 30;23:101388. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101388. eCollection 2021 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101388
PMID:34040929
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8141925/
Abstract

We sought to describe how revenues from sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) excise taxes in 7 U.S. cities are being allocated, who is benefiting from these investments, and whether allocations are consistent with the original intent of tax legislation. We collected information from public documents and key informants about allocations in the most recent fiscal year available (ranging from 2018 to 2021). Across the 7 U.S. cities with taxes, the average annual revenue from SSB taxes totaled $133.9 M. In the fiscal year studied, cities allocated a total of $133.2 M in SSB tax revenues. Human and community capital investments totaled $89.6 M (67% of all allocations) funding early childhood development, community infrastructure improvements, and youth and workforce development. Health-related investments totaled $36.9 M (28% of total allocations), funding access to healthy foods and beverages; support for physical activity opportunities; promotion of overall physical, mental or social health and wellbeing; health and nutrition education; chronic-disease prevention and management; and reducing SSB consumption. In the 3 cities that specified how tax revenues would be spent, allocations were consistent with promised uses of revenues. In addition, 85% of aggregated revenues ($112.9 M) were targeted to support work and programs in impacted communities (communities that experience health inequities, discrimination and exclusion). SSB tax revenues are supporting initiatives to improve community health, develop human and community capital, and advance equity. These investments may yield additional health benefits beyond those resulting from lower SSB consumption. Consistent tracking and public reporting on revenue allocations would increase transparency and accountability.

摘要

我们试图描述美国7个城市的含糖饮料消费税收入是如何分配的,谁从这些投资中受益,以及分配是否符合税收立法的初衷。我们从公开文件和关键信息提供者那里收集了有关最近一个财政年度(2018年至2021年)分配情况的信息。在7个征收该税的美国城市中,含糖饮料税的年均收入总计1.339亿美元。在研究的财政年度,各城市共分配了1.332亿美元的含糖饮料税收入。人力和社区资本投资总计8960万美元(占所有分配资金的67%),用于资助幼儿发展、社区基础设施改善以及青年和劳动力发展。与健康相关的投资总计3690万美元(占总分配资金的28%),用于资助获取健康食品和饮料;支持体育活动机会;促进整体身体、心理或社会健康与福祉;健康和营养教育;慢性病预防与管理;以及减少含糖饮料消费。在3个明确规定了税收收入使用方式的城市中,分配符合承诺的收入用途。此外,85%的总收入(1.129亿美元)旨在支持受影响社区(经历健康不平等、歧视和排斥的社区)的工作和项目。含糖饮料税收入正在支持改善社区健康、发展人力和社区资本以及促进公平的举措。这些投资可能会产生除降低含糖饮料消费所带来的健康益处之外的其他健康效益。对收入分配进行持续跟踪和公开报告将提高透明度和问责制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bda3/8141925/c76ffe772228/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bda3/8141925/c76ffe772228/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bda3/8141925/c76ffe772228/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
How sugar-sweetened beverage tax revenues are being used in the United States.美国如何使用含糖饮料税收入。
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Apr 30;23:101388. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101388. eCollection 2021 Sep.
2
The ethics of excise taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages.含糖饮料消费税的伦理问题。
Physiol Behav. 2020 Oct 15;225:113105. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113105. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
3
Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California, US: A before-and-after study.美国加利福尼亚州伯克利市对含糖饮料征税一年后价格、销量、消费者支出及饮料消费的变化:一项前后对照研究
PLoS Med. 2017 Apr 18;14(4):e1002283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002283. eCollection 2017 Apr.
4
Estimating the potential of taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages to reduce consumption and generate revenue.估算糖税对减少含糖饮料消费和增加税收的潜力。
Prev Med. 2011 Jun;52(6):413-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.03.013. Epub 2011 Apr 3.
5
Comparing taxes as a percentage of sugar-sweetened beverage prices in Latin America and the Caribbean.比较拉丁美洲和加勒比地区税收占含糖饮料价格的百分比。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 Jul;11:None. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100257.
6
Implementation of the First US Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax in Berkeley, CA, 2015-2019.2015-2019 年美国加利福尼亚州伯克利市实施的首个含糖饮料税。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Sep;110(9):1429-1437. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305795. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
7
"Holding the City's Feet to the Fire": Lessons Learned From Oakland's Implementation of Measure HH Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax.《让城市为自己的行为负责》:奥克兰实施 HH 号 Measure 征收含糖饮料税的经验教训。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2022;28(1):E137-E145. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001296.
8
Missed Opportunities: The Need to Promote Public Knowledge and Awareness of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes.错失的机会:需要提高公众对含糖饮料征税的认识和了解。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 27;18(9):4607. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094607.
9
Effectiveness and Policy Determinants of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes.含糖饮料税的有效性及其政策决定因素。
J Dent Res. 2021 Dec;100(13):1444-1451. doi: 10.1177/00220345211014463. Epub 2021 May 26.
10
Sweetened beverage taxes: Economic benefits and costs according to household income.加糖饮料税:根据家庭收入计算的经济效益与成本
Food Policy. 2022 Jul;110. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102277. Epub 2022 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

1
City-Level Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes and Changes in Adult Body Mass Index.城市层面的含糖饮料税与成人体重指数的变化
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2456170. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.56170.
2
Associations of the Philadelphia sweetened beverage tax with changes in adult body weight: an interrupted time series analysis.费城甜味饮料税与成人体重变化的关联:一项中断时间序列分析。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Oct 12;39:100906. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100906. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
City-Level Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes and Youth Body Mass Index Percentile.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementation of the First US Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax in Berkeley, CA, 2015-2019.2015-2019 年美国加利福尼亚州伯克利市实施的首个含糖饮料税。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Sep;110(9):1429-1437. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305795. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
2
The Impact of a Sweetened Beverage Tax on Beverage Volume Sold in Cook County, Illinois, and Its Border Area.甜味饮料税对伊利诺伊州库克县及其边界地区饮料销售量的影响。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Mar 17;172(6):390-397. doi: 10.7326/M19-2961. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
3
The impact of Seattle's Sweetened Beverage Tax on beverage prices and volume sold.
市级含糖饮料税与青少年体重指数百分位。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2424822. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.24822.
4
"Don't think of a soda": Contradictory public health messaging from a content analysis of Twitter posts about sugar-sweetened beverage taxes in California from 2015 to 2018.“别去想汽水”:对2015年至2018年加州推特上关于含糖饮料税的帖子进行内容分析得出的相互矛盾的公共卫生信息。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 9;12:1390253. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1390253. eCollection 2024.
5
U.S. food policy to address diet-related chronic disease.美国食品政策应对与饮食相关的慢性病。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 16;12:1339859. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1339859. eCollection 2024.
6
Sweetened Beverage Tax Implementation and Change in Body Mass Index Among Children in Seattle.西雅图含糖饮料征税与儿童体重指数变化。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2413644. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.13644.
7
The equitable impact of sugary drink taxation structures on sugary drink consumption among Canadians: a modelling study using the 2015 Canadian Community Health Survey-Nutrition.含糖饮料税收结构对加拿大人含糖饮料消费的公平影响:一项使用2015年加拿大社区健康调查-营养数据的建模研究。
Public Health Nutr. 2024 Apr 15;27(1):e121. doi: 10.1017/S1368980024000545.
8
Primordial prevention: Reducing consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages in racial/ethnic populations.初级预防:减少种族/族裔人群中含糖饮料的消费量。
Am Heart J Plus. 2023 Feb 24;27:100278. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2023.100278. eCollection 2023 Mar.
9
Future Intentions of Adolescents towards Physical Activity, Sports, and Leisure Practices.青少年对体育活动、运动和休闲活动的未来意向
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Dec 27;12(1):66. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12010066.
10
Who should pay the bill for the mental health crisis in Africa?谁应该为非洲的心理健康危机买单?
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2023 Dec 15;7:100458. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2023.100458. eCollection 2024 Jun.
西雅图含糖饮料税对饮料价格和销售量的影响。
Econ Hum Biol. 2020 May;37:100856. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100856. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
4
Impact of interventions to reduce overnutrition on healthcare costs related to obesity and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.干预措施对减少超重相关的医疗保健费用的影响肥胖和 2 型糖尿病:系统评价。
Nutr Rev. 2020 May 1;78(5):412-435. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuz070.
5
Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes: Emerging Evidence on a New Public Health Policy.含糖饮料税:一项新公共卫生政策的新证据
JAMA. 2019 May 14;321(18):1777-1779. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.5344.
6
State tobacco revenues compared with tobacco control appropriations--United States, 1998-2010.国家烟草税收与烟草控制拨款比较——美国,1998-2010 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012 May 25;61(20):370-4.