• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《让城市为自己的行为负责》:奥克兰实施 HH 号 Measure 征收含糖饮料税的经验教训。

"Holding the City's Feet to the Fire": Lessons Learned From Oakland's Implementation of Measure HH Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax.

机构信息

Institute for Health Research and Policy (Drs Asada, Chriqui, Taher, and Powell and Ms Pipito), and Division of Health Policy and Administration, School of Public Health (Drs Chriqui and Powell), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

J Public Health Manag Pract. 2022;28(1):E137-E145. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001296.

DOI:10.1097/PHH.0000000000001296
PMID:34797249
Abstract

CONTEXT

Sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) taxes offer a promising public health strategy to decrease consumption of sugary beverages. To date, 7 US cities have successfully implemented SSB taxes; however, only a few studies have examined adoption and implementation processes.

OBJECTIVES

To describe public health and policy lessons learned during the first 2.5 years of implementation of the Oakland, California, penny-per-ounce SSB tax, Measure HH.

DESIGN

A mixed-methods, longitudinal, qualitative case study was conducted using a combination of key informant interviews with implementation stakeholders as well as analyses of archival documents and media documents from 2016 to 2019. Interviews were digitally recorded and professionally transcribed. Interview transcripts, archival documents, and media documents were analyzed by 3 coders using Atlas.ti v8. Analyses employed principles of constant comparative analysis to identify themes related to lessons learned.

SETTING

Oakland, California.

PARTICIPANTS

Key informants (n = 15), archival documents (n = 43), and media documents (n = 90).

INTERVENTION

Oakland, California's SSB tax (Measure HH).

RESULTS

Implementation lessons included both success stories and challenges. Successes included contracting a third-party tax administrator to support tax collection and education; leveraging a pro-tax coalition to counteract industry attacks and to protect tax revenue; and offering "quick win" funding to support local needs. Challenges were associated with implementing a "general" tax versus a "special" tax; the lack of explicit revenue allocation in the ordinance to support city-level implementation and oversight; and, the original ordinance language for tax application to distributors.

CONCLUSIONS

The study offers a range of recommendations-derived from lessons learned over several years of implementation-to policy makers and advocates engaged in SSB tax adoption and implementation efforts in their jurisdictions. SSB tax implementation requires sufficient agency administrative capacity and a strong pro-tax coalition that engages local community organizations to respond to public health needs.

摘要

背景

含糖饮料(SSB)税是一种有前途的公共卫生策略,可以降低含糖饮料的消费。迄今为止,美国已有 7 个城市成功实施了 SSB 税;然而,只有少数研究调查了采用和实施过程。

目的

描述加利福尼亚州奥克兰市实施每盎司 1 美分 SSB 税(Measure HH)的头 2.5 年的公共卫生和政策经验教训。

设计

采用混合方法、纵向、定性案例研究方法,对 2016 年至 2019 年期间的实施利益相关者进行关键知情人访谈,并对档案文件和媒体文件进行分析。访谈进行了数字记录和专业转录。3 名编码员使用 Atlas.ti v8 分析访谈记录、档案文件和媒体文件。分析采用恒比分析原则,以确定与经验教训相关的主题。

地点

加利福尼亚州奥克兰市。

参与者

关键知情人(n = 15)、档案文件(n = 43)和媒体文件(n = 90)。

干预措施

奥克兰,加利福尼亚州的 SSB 税(Measure HH)。

结果

实施经验包括成功案例和挑战。成功之处包括聘请第三方税务管理机构支持税收征收和教育;利用支持税收的联盟来对抗行业攻击和保护税收收入;并提供“快速获胜”资金以支持当地需求。挑战与实施“一般性”税与“特殊性”税有关;法规中缺乏明确的收入分配,以支持市级实施和监督;以及最初的法规语言,将税收应用于分销商。

结论

本研究从多年的实施经验中为政策制定者和倡导者提供了一系列建议,这些建议可用于他们管辖范围内的 SSB 税的采用和实施工作。SSB 税的实施需要足够的机构行政能力和强大的支持税收的联盟,该联盟需要与当地社区组织合作,以满足公共卫生需求。

相似文献

1
"Holding the City's Feet to the Fire": Lessons Learned From Oakland's Implementation of Measure HH Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax.《让城市为自己的行为负责》:奥克兰实施 HH 号 Measure 征收含糖饮料税的经验教训。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2022;28(1):E137-E145. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001296.
2
Media Coverage and Framing of Oakland's Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax, 2016-2019.媒体对奥克兰含糖饮料税的报道和框架,2016-2019 年。
Am J Health Promot. 2021 Jun;35(5):698-702. doi: 10.1177/0890117120986104. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
3
Oakland's Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax: Honoring the "Spirit" of the Ordinance Toward Equitable Implementation.奥克兰市的含糖饮料税:秉持该条例的“精神”以实现公平实施。
Health Equity. 2021 Feb 2;5(1):35-41. doi: 10.1089/heq.2020.0079. eCollection 2021.
4
Examining the Role and Strategies of Advocacy Coalitions in California's Statewide Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax Debate (2001-2018).审视倡导联盟在加利福尼亚州全州含糖饮料税辩论(2001-2018 年)中的作用和策略。
Am J Health Promot. 2024 Jan;38(1):101-111. doi: 10.1177/08901171231201007. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
5
Longer-term impacts of the Oakland, California, sugar-sweetened beverage tax on prices and volume sold at two-years post-tax.加利福尼亚州奥克兰市征收含糖饮料税后两年内对价格和销售量的长期影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114537. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114537. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
6
Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California, US: A before-and-after study.美国加利福尼亚州伯克利市对含糖饮料征税一年后价格、销量、消费者支出及饮料消费的变化:一项前后对照研究
PLoS Med. 2017 Apr 18;14(4):e1002283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002283. eCollection 2017 Apr.
7
Implementation of the First US Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax in Berkeley, CA, 2015-2019.2015-2019 年美国加利福尼亚州伯克利市实施的首个含糖饮料税。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Sep;110(9):1429-1437. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305795. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
8
Evaluation of the sugar-sweetened beverage tax in Oakland, United States, 2015-2019: A quasi-experimental and cost-effectiveness study.2015-2019 年美国奥克兰市含糖饮料税评估:一项准实验和成本效益研究。
PLoS Med. 2023 Apr 18;20(4):e1004212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004212. eCollection 2023 Apr.
9
City-Level Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes and Youth Body Mass Index Percentile.市级含糖饮料税与青少年体重指数百分位。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2424822. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.24822.
10
Evaluation of Changes in Prices and Purchases Following Implementation of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes Across the US.评估美国实施含糖饮料税后价格和购买量的变化。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Jan 5;5(1):e234737. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.4737.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of the Philadelphia Beverage Tax on Perceived Beverage Healthfulness, Tax Awareness, and Tax Opinions.费城饮料税对感知饮料健康度、税收意识和税收意见的影响。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2024 May;56(5):321-331. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2024.02.001. Epub 2024 Mar 10.
2
Advancing the science of policy implementation: a call to action for the implementation science field.推进政策实施科学:实施科学领域的行动呼吁。
Transl Behav Med. 2023 Nov 5;13(11):820-825. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad034.
3
Evaluation of Seattle's sweetened beverage tax on tax support and perceived economic and health impacts.
评估西雅图含糖饮料税对税收支持以及感知到的经济和健康影响。
Prev Med Rep. 2022 Apr 30;27:101809. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101809. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
Sugar-sweetened beverage tax implementation processes: results of a scoping review.含糖饮料税实施过程:范围综述结果。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Mar 24;20(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00832-3.