Rohan Pat, Daly Niamh, O'Kelly Aoife, O'Leary Martin, Dineen Tim, Shah Nigam, Daly Padraig, Waterstone John, Cullen Ivor
Department of Urology, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland.
Waterstone Clinic, Cork, Ireland.
J Reprod Infertil. 2021 Apr-Jun;22(2):103-109. doi: 10.18502/jri.v22i2.5795.
Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) is the gold standard approach in sperm retrieval in men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). The purpose of the study was to assess the outcomes for Irish men who have undergone mTESE with a single surgeon.
This is a retrospective, single cohort study. Thirty-four patients underwent mTESE between September 2015 and June 2019. A p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
In this study, sperm retrieval rate (SRR) was 47.06%. (16/34). The mean age in those who had retrieved sperm at mTESE was 37.9±2.6 years. Johnson Score (JS) and FSH were statistically different between successful and unsuccessful mTESE groups (p=0.017*10 and p=0.004, respectively). Optimal cutoff values for FSH, T and JS were 15 , 13 and 5, respectively. The pregnancy rate was 63.64% (7/11) among men who went on to use mTESE sperm in an ICSI cycle.
The combination of mTESE/Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is the best option available for men with NOA who prefer to achieve paternity using their own DNA. Given the overall SRRs in mTESE, it is imperative to continue research for a predictive model to better counsel azoospermic men regarding the use of mTESE. For this purpose, large, multicenter, randomized controlled trials are needed.
显微切割睾丸取精术(mTESE)是治疗非梗阻性无精子症(NOA)男性患者取精的金标准方法。本研究旨在评估由单一外科医生为爱尔兰男性实施mTESE的治疗效果。
这是一项回顾性单队列研究。2015年9月至2019年6月期间,34例患者接受了mTESE。p<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
本研究中,精子获取率(SRR)为47.06%(16/34)。mTESE取精成功患者的平均年龄为37.9±2.6岁。mTESE成功组与失败组之间的约翰逊评分(JS)和卵泡刺激素(FSH)存在统计学差异(分别为p = 0.017×10和p = 0.004)。FSH、睾酮(T)和JS的最佳截断值分别为15、13和5。在ICSI周期中使用mTESE获取精子的男性患者,其妊娠率为63.64%(7/11)。
对于希望通过自身DNA实现生育的NOA男性患者,mTESE/卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)联合治疗是最佳选择。鉴于mTESE的总体精子获取率,继续开展研究以建立预测模型,从而更好地为无精子症男性提供关于mTESE使用的咨询建议势在必行。为此,需要开展大规模、多中心、随机对照试验。