Frederico Stephen C, Hancock John C, Brettschneider Emily E S, Ratnam Nivedita M, Gilbert Mark R, Terabe Masaki
Neuro-Oncology Branch, CCR, NCI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Front Oncol. 2021 May 10;11:672508. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.672508. eCollection 2021.
The use of immunotherapies for the treatment of brain tumors is a topic that has garnered considerable excitement in recent years. Discoveries such as the presence of a glymphatic system and immune surveillance in the central nervous system (CNS) have shattered the theory of immune privilege and opened up the possibility of treating CNS malignancies with immunotherapies. However, despite many immunotherapy clinical trials aimed at treating glioblastoma (GBM), very few have demonstrated a significant survival benefit. Several factors for this have been identified, one of which is that GBMs are immunologically "cold," implying that the cancer does not induce a strong T cell response. It is postulated that this is why clinical trials using an immune checkpoint inhibitor alone have not demonstrated efficacy. While it is well established that anti-cancer T cell responses can be facilitated by the presentation of tumor-specific antigens to the immune system, treatment-related death of GBM cells and subsequent release of molecules have not been shown to be sufficient to evoke an anti-tumor immune response effective enough to have a significant impact. To overcome this limitation, vaccines can be used to introduce exogenous antigens at higher concentrations to the immune system to induce strong tumor antigen-specific T cell responses. In this review, we will describe vaccination strategies that are under investigation to treat GBM; categorizing them based on their target antigens, form of antigens, vehicles used, and pairing with specific adjuvants. We will review the concept of vaccine therapy in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors, as it is hypothesized that this approach may be more effective in overcoming the immunosuppressive milieu of GBM. Clinical trial design and the need for incorporating robust immune monitoring into future studies will also be discussed here. We believe that the integration of evolving technologies of vaccine development, delivery, and immune monitoring will further enhance the role of these therapies and will likely remain an important area of investigation for future treatment strategies for GBM patients.
免疫疗法用于治疗脑肿瘤是近年来备受关注的一个话题。诸如中枢神经系统(CNS)中存在类淋巴系统和免疫监视等发现,打破了免疫豁免理论,并开启了用免疫疗法治疗CNS恶性肿瘤的可能性。然而,尽管有许多旨在治疗胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)的免疫疗法临床试验,但很少有试验显示出显著的生存获益。已确定了几个导致这种情况的因素,其中之一是GBM在免疫上是“冷”的,这意味着癌症不会诱导强烈的T细胞反应。据推测,这就是单独使用免疫检查点抑制剂的临床试验未显示出疗效的原因。虽然众所周知,向免疫系统呈递肿瘤特异性抗原可促进抗癌T细胞反应,但GBM细胞的治疗相关死亡及随后分子的释放尚未被证明足以引发有效的抗肿瘤免疫反应,从而产生显著影响。为克服这一限制,可使用疫苗以更高浓度将外源性抗原引入免疫系统,以诱导强烈的肿瘤抗原特异性T细胞反应。在本综述中,我们将描述正在研究的用于治疗GBM的疫苗接种策略;根据其靶抗原、抗原形式、所用载体以及与特定佐剂的配对对它们进行分类。我们将回顾疫苗疗法与免疫检查点抑制剂联合使用的概念,因为据推测这种方法可能在克服GBM的免疫抑制环境方面更有效。这里还将讨论临床试验设计以及在未来研究中纳入强大免疫监测的必要性。我们相信,疫苗开发、递送和免疫监测等不断发展的技术的整合将进一步增强这些疗法的作用,并且很可能仍将是GBM患者未来治疗策略的一个重要研究领域。