Du Ping, Yin Xin, Kong Lan, Jung Jeah
Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
Telemed Rep. 2021 May 13;2(1):143-147. doi: 10.1089/tmr.2021.0001. eCollection 2021.
Rural patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection may be less likely to access HCV care than those in urban areas. A telementoring, task-shifting model has been implemented to address the unmet needs of HCV care. Evidence is needed on whether this intervention improves HCV care in rural HCV patients. We compared three key HCV care indicators among Medicare patients with chronic hepatitis C in 2014-2016 by urban-rural status between New Mexico with a telementoring program and Pennsylvania without such a program. We classified each patient's urban-rural status based on his or her ZIP code of residence. We used multivariable log-binomial regressions to examine the relative probability of receiving HCV care by urban and rural status in two states. In New Mexico, 41.3% of HCV patients resided in rural areas ( = 1155). In Pennsylvania, rural patients accounted for 13.2% ( = 1775). The unadjusted overall rates of receiving HCV RNA or genotype testing within 12 months before HCV treatment were 76.1% in "rural-New Mexico" versus 73.3% in "rural-Pennsylvania," 66.2% in "urban-New Mexico," and 70.2% in "urban-Pennsylvania." Post-treatment HCV RNA testing rate was also high in "rural-New Mexico" (83.0%). After adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics, "rural-New Mexico" HCV patients who received HCV treatment still had the highest probability of taking HCV RNA or genotype testing before HCV treatment, compared with other groups (relative risk [95% confidence interval]: 0.91 [0.84-1.00] in "rural-Pennsylvania," 0.85 [0.78-0.93] in "urban-New Mexico," and 0.93 [0.87-1.00] in "urban-Pennsylvania"). The telementoring program may help improve HCV care in rural patients.
与城市地区的患者相比,农村慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染者获得HCV治疗的可能性可能更低。一种远程指导、任务转移模式已被实施,以满足HCV治疗未得到满足的需求。需要有证据证明这种干预措施是否能改善农村HCV患者的HCV治疗情况。我们比较了2014 - 2016年医疗保险慢性丙型肝炎患者中,有远程指导项目的新墨西哥州和没有该项目的宾夕法尼亚州按城乡状况划分的三个关键HCV治疗指标。我们根据每位患者的居住邮政编码对其城乡状况进行分类。我们使用多变量对数二项回归来研究两个州城乡状况下接受HCV治疗的相对概率。在新墨西哥州,41.3%的HCV患者居住在农村地区(n = 1155)。在宾夕法尼亚州,农村患者占13.2%(n = 1775)。在HCV治疗前12个月内接受HCV RNA或基因分型检测的未调整总体率,“新墨西哥州农村”为76.1%,“宾夕法尼亚州农村”为73.3%,“新墨西哥州城市”为66.2%,“宾夕法尼亚州城市”为70.2%。“新墨西哥州农村”的治疗后HCV RNA检测率也很高(83.0%)。在调整了人口统计学和临床特征后,接受HCV治疗的“新墨西哥州农村”HCV患者在HCV治疗前进行HCV RNA或基因分型检测的概率仍高于其他组(相对风险[95%置信区间]:“宾夕法尼亚州农村”为0.91[0.84 - 1.00],“新墨西哥州城市”为0.85[0.78 - 0.93],“宾夕法尼亚州城市”为0.93[0.87 - 1.00])。远程指导项目可能有助于改善农村患者的HCV治疗情况。