Institute of Chemical, Environmental and Bioscience Engineering, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria.
Institute of Engineering Design and Product Development, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria.
Physiol Rep. 2021 May;9(10):e14880. doi: 10.14814/phy2.14880.
Animal blood is used in mock circulations or in forensic bloodstain pattern analysis. Blood viscosity is important in these settings as it determines the driving pressure through biomedical devices and the shape of the bloodstain. However, animal blood can never exactly mimic human blood due to erythrocyte properties differing among species. This results in the species-specific shear thinning behavior of blood suspensions, and it is therefore not enough to adjust the hematocrit of an animal blood sample to mimic the behavior of human blood over the entire range of shear rates that are present in the body. In order to optimize experiments that require animal blood, we need models to adapt the blood samples. We here offer mathematical models derived for each species using a multi linear regression approach to describe the influence of shear rate, hematocrit, and temperature on blood viscosity. Results show that pig blood cannot be recommended for experiments at low flow conditions (<200 s ) even though erythrocyte properties are similar in pigs and humans. However, pig blood mimics human blood excellently at high flow condition. Horse blood is unsuitable as experimental model in this regard. For several studied conditions, sheep blood was the closest match to human blood viscosity among the tested species.
动物血液被用于模拟循环或法医血斑分析。在这些情况下,血液粘度很重要,因为它决定了通过生物医学设备的驱动压力和血斑的形状。然而,由于物种间的红细胞特性不同,动物血液永远无法完全模拟人类血液。这导致了血液悬浮液的特定于物种的剪切稀化行为,因此仅仅调整动物血液样本的血细胞比容不足以模拟人体血液在体内存在的整个剪切速率范围内的行为。为了优化需要动物血液的实验,我们需要模型来适应血液样本。在这里,我们提供了使用多元线性回归方法为每种物种推导的数学模型,以描述剪切率、血细胞比容和温度对血液粘度的影响。结果表明,即使猪和人类的红细胞特性相似,猪血液也不适合在低流量条件(<200 s)下进行实验。然而,猪血液在高流量条件下极好地模拟了人类血液。马血液在这方面不适合作为实验模型。对于几种研究条件,绵羊血液是测试物种中最接近人类血液粘度的血液。