Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 27;23(5):e24003. doi: 10.2196/24003.
There is growing interest in identifying and recruiting research participants from health systems using electronic health records (EHRs). However, few studies have described the practical aspects of the recruitment process or compared electronic recruitment methods to in-person recruitment, particularly across health systems.
The objective of this study was to describe the steps and efficiency of the recruitment process and participant characteristics by recruitment strategy.
EHR-based eligibility criteria included being an adult patient engaged in outpatient primary or bariatric surgery care at one of 5 health systems in the PaTH Clinical Research Network and having ≥2 weight measurements and 1 height measurement recorded in their EHR within the last 5 years. Recruitment strategies varied by site and included one or more of the following methods: (1) in-person recruitment by study staff from clinical sites, (2) US postal mail recruitment letters, (3) secure email, and (4) direct EHR recruitment through secure patient web portals. We used descriptive statistics to evaluate participant characteristics and proportion of patients recruited (ie, efficiency) by modality.
The total number of eligible patients from the 5 health systems was 5,051,187. Of these, 40,048 (0.8%) were invited to enter an EHR-based cohort study and 1085 were enrolled. Recruitment efficiency was highest for in-person recruitment (33.5%), followed by electronic messaging (2.9%), including email (2.9%) and EHR patient portal messages (2.9%). Overall, 779 (65.7%) patients were enrolled through electronic messaging, which also showed greater rates of recruitment of Black patients compared with the other strategies.
We recruited a total of 1085 patients from primary care and bariatric surgery settings using 4 recruitment strategies. The recruitment efficiency was 2.9% for email and EHR patient portals, with the majority of participants recruited electronically. This study can inform the design of future research studies using EHR-based recruitment.
越来越多的人对利用电子健康记录(EHR)从健康系统中识别和招募研究参与者感兴趣。然而,很少有研究描述过招募过程的实际方面,也没有比较过电子招募方法与面对面招募方法,特别是在不同的健康系统之间。
本研究的目的是描述通过招募策略的招募过程步骤和效率以及参与者特征。
基于 EHR 的入选标准包括:作为一名参与门诊初级保健或减重手术护理的成年患者,来自 PaTH 临床研究网络的 5 个医疗系统之一,并且在过去 5 年内其 EHR 中至少有 2 次体重测量值和 1 次身高测量值记录。招募策略因地点而异,包括以下一种或多种方法:(1)由临床地点的研究人员进行的面对面招募,(2)美国邮政邮件招募信,(3)安全电子邮件,以及(4)通过安全的患者网络门户直接进行 EHR 招募。我们使用描述性统计来评估参与者特征和每种模式的招募患者比例(即效率)。
来自 5 个医疗系统的符合条件的患者总数为 5051187 人。其中,有 40048 人(0.8%)被邀请参加基于 EHR 的队列研究,有 1085 人入组。面对面招募的效率最高(33.5%),其次是电子信息传递(2.9%),包括电子邮件(2.9%)和 EHR 患者门户消息(2.9%)。总体而言,有 779 名(65.7%)患者通过电子信息传递入组,这种方法也显示出比其他策略更高的招募黑人患者的比例。
我们使用 4 种招募策略从初级保健和减重手术环境中总共招募了 1085 名患者。电子邮件和 EHR 患者门户的招募效率为 2.9%,大多数参与者是通过电子方式招募的。本研究可为未来使用基于 EHR 的招募方法设计研究提供信息。