Suppr超能文献

从 5 个医疗系统的电子健康记录中招募多中心临床队列研究患者:横断面分析。

Patient Recruitment Into a Multicenter Clinical Cohort Linking Electronic Health Records From 5 Health Systems: Cross-sectional Analysis.

机构信息

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.

University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 27;23(5):e24003. doi: 10.2196/24003.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is growing interest in identifying and recruiting research participants from health systems using electronic health records (EHRs). However, few studies have described the practical aspects of the recruitment process or compared electronic recruitment methods to in-person recruitment, particularly across health systems.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to describe the steps and efficiency of the recruitment process and participant characteristics by recruitment strategy.

METHODS

EHR-based eligibility criteria included being an adult patient engaged in outpatient primary or bariatric surgery care at one of 5 health systems in the PaTH Clinical Research Network and having ≥2 weight measurements and 1 height measurement recorded in their EHR within the last 5 years. Recruitment strategies varied by site and included one or more of the following methods: (1) in-person recruitment by study staff from clinical sites, (2) US postal mail recruitment letters, (3) secure email, and (4) direct EHR recruitment through secure patient web portals. We used descriptive statistics to evaluate participant characteristics and proportion of patients recruited (ie, efficiency) by modality.

RESULTS

The total number of eligible patients from the 5 health systems was 5,051,187. Of these, 40,048 (0.8%) were invited to enter an EHR-based cohort study and 1085 were enrolled. Recruitment efficiency was highest for in-person recruitment (33.5%), followed by electronic messaging (2.9%), including email (2.9%) and EHR patient portal messages (2.9%). Overall, 779 (65.7%) patients were enrolled through electronic messaging, which also showed greater rates of recruitment of Black patients compared with the other strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

We recruited a total of 1085 patients from primary care and bariatric surgery settings using 4 recruitment strategies. The recruitment efficiency was 2.9% for email and EHR patient portals, with the majority of participants recruited electronically. This study can inform the design of future research studies using EHR-based recruitment.

摘要

背景

越来越多的人对利用电子健康记录(EHR)从健康系统中识别和招募研究参与者感兴趣。然而,很少有研究描述过招募过程的实际方面,也没有比较过电子招募方法与面对面招募方法,特别是在不同的健康系统之间。

目的

本研究的目的是描述通过招募策略的招募过程步骤和效率以及参与者特征。

方法

基于 EHR 的入选标准包括:作为一名参与门诊初级保健或减重手术护理的成年患者,来自 PaTH 临床研究网络的 5 个医疗系统之一,并且在过去 5 年内其 EHR 中至少有 2 次体重测量值和 1 次身高测量值记录。招募策略因地点而异,包括以下一种或多种方法:(1)由临床地点的研究人员进行的面对面招募,(2)美国邮政邮件招募信,(3)安全电子邮件,以及(4)通过安全的患者网络门户直接进行 EHR 招募。我们使用描述性统计来评估参与者特征和每种模式的招募患者比例(即效率)。

结果

来自 5 个医疗系统的符合条件的患者总数为 5051187 人。其中,有 40048 人(0.8%)被邀请参加基于 EHR 的队列研究,有 1085 人入组。面对面招募的效率最高(33.5%),其次是电子信息传递(2.9%),包括电子邮件(2.9%)和 EHR 患者门户消息(2.9%)。总体而言,有 779 名(65.7%)患者通过电子信息传递入组,这种方法也显示出比其他策略更高的招募黑人患者的比例。

结论

我们使用 4 种招募策略从初级保健和减重手术环境中总共招募了 1085 名患者。电子邮件和 EHR 患者门户的招募效率为 2.9%,大多数参与者是通过电子方式招募的。本研究可为未来使用基于 EHR 的招募方法设计研究提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96b1/8193474/d2b57a481933/jmir_v23i5e24003_fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验