Nettekoven Charlotte, Volz Lukas J, Leimbach Martha, Pool Eva-Maria, Rehme Anne K, Eickhoff Simon B, Fink Gereon R, Grefkes Christian
Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1, INM-3), Juelich Research Centre, 52428 Juelich, Germany; Department of Neurology, Cologne University Hospital, 50924 Cologne, Germany.
Department of Neurology, Cologne University Hospital, 50924 Cologne, Germany.
Neuroimage. 2015 Sep;118:209-18. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.004. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
The responsiveness to non-invasive neuromodulation protocols shows high inter-individual variability, the reasons of which remain poorly understood. We here tested whether the response to intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) - an effective repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocol for increasing cortical excitability - depends on network properties of the cortical motor system. We furthermore investigated whether the responsiveness to iTBS is dose-dependent. To this end, we used a sham-stimulation controlled, single-blinded within-subject design testing for the relationship between iTBS aftereffects and (i) motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) as well as (ii) resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) in 16 healthy subjects. In each session, three blocks of iTBS were applied, separated by 15min. We found that non-responders (subjects not showing an MEP increase of ≥10% after one iTBS block) featured stronger rsFC between the stimulated primary motor cortex (M1) and premotor areas before stimulation compared to responders. However, only the group of responders showed increases in rsFC and MEPs, while most non-responders remained close to baseline levels after all three blocks of iTBS. Importantly, there was still a large amount of variability in both groups. Our data suggest that responsiveness to iTBS at the local level (i.e., M1 excitability) depends upon the pre-interventional network connectivity of the stimulated region. Of note, increasing iTBS dose did not turn non-responders into responders. The finding that higher levels of pre-interventional connectivity precluded a response to iTBS could reflect a ceiling effect underlying non-responsiveness to iTBS at the systems level.
对非侵入性神经调节方案的反应存在高度个体差异,其原因仍知之甚少。我们在此测试了对间歇性θ波爆发刺激(iTBS)——一种用于增加皮层兴奋性的有效重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)方案——的反应是否取决于皮层运动系统的网络特性。我们还研究了对iTBS的反应是否呈剂量依赖性。为此,我们采用了假刺激对照、单盲的受试者内设计,测试了16名健康受试者中iTBS后效应与(i)运动诱发电位(MEP)以及(ii)静息态功能连接(rsFC)之间的关系。在每个实验环节中,施加三个iTBS块,间隔15分钟。我们发现,无反应者(在一个iTBS块后MEP增加未达到≥10%的受试者)在刺激前,其受刺激的初级运动皮层(M1)与运动前区之间的rsFC比有反应者更强。然而,只有有反应者组的rsFC和MEP有所增加,而大多数无反应者在所有三个iTBS块后仍接近基线水平。重要的是,两组中仍存在大量变异性。我们的数据表明,在局部水平(即M1兴奋性)对iTBS的反应取决于受刺激区域的干预前网络连接性。值得注意的是,增加iTBS剂量并未使无反应者转变为有反应者。干预前连接性较高会导致对iTBS无反应这一发现,可能反映了系统水平上对iTBS无反应背后的天花板效应。