Suppr超能文献

多次重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)后皮质兴奋性和运动网络连接的个体间变异性。

Inter-individual variability in cortical excitability and motor network connectivity following multiple blocks of rTMS.

作者信息

Nettekoven Charlotte, Volz Lukas J, Leimbach Martha, Pool Eva-Maria, Rehme Anne K, Eickhoff Simon B, Fink Gereon R, Grefkes Christian

机构信息

Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1, INM-3), Juelich Research Centre, 52428 Juelich, Germany; Department of Neurology, Cologne University Hospital, 50924 Cologne, Germany.

Department of Neurology, Cologne University Hospital, 50924 Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 2015 Sep;118:209-18. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.004. Epub 2015 Jun 5.

Abstract

The responsiveness to non-invasive neuromodulation protocols shows high inter-individual variability, the reasons of which remain poorly understood. We here tested whether the response to intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) - an effective repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocol for increasing cortical excitability - depends on network properties of the cortical motor system. We furthermore investigated whether the responsiveness to iTBS is dose-dependent. To this end, we used a sham-stimulation controlled, single-blinded within-subject design testing for the relationship between iTBS aftereffects and (i) motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) as well as (ii) resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) in 16 healthy subjects. In each session, three blocks of iTBS were applied, separated by 15min. We found that non-responders (subjects not showing an MEP increase of ≥10% after one iTBS block) featured stronger rsFC between the stimulated primary motor cortex (M1) and premotor areas before stimulation compared to responders. However, only the group of responders showed increases in rsFC and MEPs, while most non-responders remained close to baseline levels after all three blocks of iTBS. Importantly, there was still a large amount of variability in both groups. Our data suggest that responsiveness to iTBS at the local level (i.e., M1 excitability) depends upon the pre-interventional network connectivity of the stimulated region. Of note, increasing iTBS dose did not turn non-responders into responders. The finding that higher levels of pre-interventional connectivity precluded a response to iTBS could reflect a ceiling effect underlying non-responsiveness to iTBS at the systems level.

摘要

对非侵入性神经调节方案的反应存在高度个体差异,其原因仍知之甚少。我们在此测试了对间歇性θ波爆发刺激(iTBS)——一种用于增加皮层兴奋性的有效重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)方案——的反应是否取决于皮层运动系统的网络特性。我们还研究了对iTBS的反应是否呈剂量依赖性。为此,我们采用了假刺激对照、单盲的受试者内设计,测试了16名健康受试者中iTBS后效应与(i)运动诱发电位(MEP)以及(ii)静息态功能连接(rsFC)之间的关系。在每个实验环节中,施加三个iTBS块,间隔15分钟。我们发现,无反应者(在一个iTBS块后MEP增加未达到≥10%的受试者)在刺激前,其受刺激的初级运动皮层(M1)与运动前区之间的rsFC比有反应者更强。然而,只有有反应者组的rsFC和MEP有所增加,而大多数无反应者在所有三个iTBS块后仍接近基线水平。重要的是,两组中仍存在大量变异性。我们的数据表明,在局部水平(即M1兴奋性)对iTBS的反应取决于受刺激区域的干预前网络连接性。值得注意的是,增加iTBS剂量并未使无反应者转变为有反应者。干预前连接性较高会导致对iTBS无反应这一发现,可能反映了系统水平上对iTBS无反应背后的天花板效应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eba8/5216181/5a97b9a54dfe/nihms827816f1.jpg

相似文献

9
Aftereffects of Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation in Adjacent, Non-Target Muscles.相邻非靶肌肉间歇性 theta 爆发刺激的后效。
Neuroscience. 2019 Oct 15;418:157-165. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.08.043. Epub 2019 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

4
A Novel Real-time Phase Prediction Network in EEG Rhythm.一种用于脑电节律的新型实时相位预测网络。
Neurosci Bull. 2025 Mar;41(3):391-405. doi: 10.1007/s12264-024-01321-z. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
10
Driving innovation in addiction treatment: role of transcranial magnetic stimulation.推动成瘾治疗创新:经颅磁刺激的作用。
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2024 May;131(5):505-508. doi: 10.1007/s00702-023-02734-2. Epub 2024 Jan 17.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验