• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良版韩国甲状腺影像报告和数据系统对甲状腺恶性肿瘤的诊断性能与三项国际指南的比较。

Comparison of the diagnostic performance of the modified Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System for thyroid malignancy with three international guidelines.

作者信息

Ha Eun Ju, Shin Jung Hee, Na Dong Gyu, Jung So Lyung, Lee Young Hen, Paik Wooyul, Hong Min Ji, Kim Yeo Koon, Lee Chang Yoon

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.

Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Ultrasonography. 2021 Oct;40(4):594-601. doi: 10.14366/usg.21056. Epub 2021 Apr 5.

DOI:10.14366/usg.21056
PMID:34044490
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8446501/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study compared the diagnostic performance of the modified Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (K-TIRADS) for thyroid malignancy with three international guidelines.

METHODS

From June to September 2015, 5,708 thyroid nodules (≥1.0 cm) in 5,081 consecutive patients who underwent thyroid ultrasound (US) at 26 institutions were evaluated. The US features of the thyroid nodules were retrospectively reviewed and classified according to all four guidelines. In the modified K-TIRADS, the biopsy size threshold was changed to 2.0 cm for K-TIRADS 3 and 1.0 or 1.5 cm for K-TIRADS 4 (K-TIRADS1.0cm and K-TIRADS1.5cm, respectively). We compared the diagnostic performance and unnecessary fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) rates for thyroid malignancy between the modified K-TIRADS and three international guidelines.

RESULTS

Of the 5,708 thyroid nodules, 4,597 (80.5%) were benign and 1,111 (19.5%) were malignant. The overall sensitivity was highest for the modified K-TIRADS1.0cm (91.0%), followed by the European (EU)-TIRADS (84.6%), American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology/Associazione Medici Endocrinologi (AACE/ACE/AME) (80.5%), American College of Radiology (ACR)-TIRADS (76.1%), and modified K-TIRADS1.5cm (76.1%). For large nodules (>2.0 cm), the sensitivity increased to 98.0% in both the modified K-TIRADS1.0cm and K-TIRADS1.5cm. For small nodules (≤2.0 cm), the unnecessary FNAB rate was lowest with the modified K-TIRADS1.5cm (17.6%), followed by the ACR-TIRADS (18.6%), AACE/ACE/AME (19.3%), EU-TIRADS (28.1%), and modified K-TIRADS1.0cm (31.2%).

CONCLUSION

The modified K-TIRADS1.5cm can reduce the unnecessary FNAB rate for small nodules (1.0-2.0 cm), while maintaining high sensitivity for detecting malignancies >2.0 cm.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了改良的韩国甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(K-TIRADS)对甲状腺恶性肿瘤的诊断性能与三项国际指南。

方法

2015年6月至9月,对26家机构连续5081例接受甲状腺超声(US)检查的患者中的5708个甲状腺结节(≥1.0 cm)进行了评估。回顾性分析甲状腺结节的超声特征,并根据所有四项指南进行分类。在改良的K-TIRADS中,K-TIRADS 3类的活检大小阈值改为2.0 cm,K-TIRADS 4类的活检大小阈值改为1.0 cm或1.5 cm(分别为K-TIRADS1.0cm和K-TIRADS1.5cm)。我们比较了改良的K-TIRADS与三项国际指南对甲状腺恶性肿瘤的诊断性能和不必要的细针穿刺活检(FNAB)率。

结果

在5708个甲状腺结节中,4597个(80.5%)为良性,1111个(19.5%)为恶性。改良的K-TIRADS1.0cm的总体敏感性最高(91.0%),其次是欧洲(EU)-TIRADS(84.6%)、美国临床内分泌学家协会/美国内分泌学会/意大利内分泌医生协会(AACE/ACE/AME)(80.5%)、美国放射学会(ACR)-TIRADS(76.1%)和改良的K-TIRADS-1.5cm(76.1%)。对于大结节(>2.0 cm),改良的K-TIRADS1.0cm和K-TIRADS1.5cm的敏感性均提高到98.0%。对于小结节(≤2.0 cm),改良的K-TIRADS1.5cm的不必要FNAB率最低(17.6%),其次是ACR-TIRADS(18.6%)、AACE/ACE/AME(19.3%)、EU-TIRADS(28.1%)和改良的K-TIRADS1.0cm(31.2%)。

结论

改良的K-TIRADS1.5cm可以降低小结节(1.0~2.0 cm)的不必要FNAB率,同时保持对>2.0 cm恶性肿瘤的高敏感性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4d5/8446501/24a299e44085/usg-21056f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4d5/8446501/24a299e44085/usg-21056f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4d5/8446501/24a299e44085/usg-21056f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of the diagnostic performance of the modified Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System for thyroid malignancy with three international guidelines.改良版韩国甲状腺影像报告和数据系统对甲状腺恶性肿瘤的诊断性能与三项国际指南的比较。
Ultrasonography. 2021 Oct;40(4):594-601. doi: 10.14366/usg.21056. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
2
Diagnostic Performance of Six Ultrasound Risk Stratification Systems for Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.六种甲状腺结节超声风险分层系统的诊断性能:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023 Jun;220(6):791-803. doi: 10.2214/AJR.22.28556. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
3
Diagnostic Performance of the Modified Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System for Thyroid Malignancy: A Multicenter Validation Study.改良版韩国甲状腺影像报告和数据系统对甲状腺恶性肿瘤的诊断性能:一项多中心验证研究。
Korean J Radiol. 2021 Sep;22(9):1579-1586. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2021.0230. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
4
US Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy for Thyroid Malignancy: Diagnostic Performance of Seven Society Guidelines Applied to 2000 Thyroid Nodules.美国甲状腺恶性肿瘤细针抽吸活检:7 项学会指南应用于 2000 个甲状腺结节的诊断性能。
Radiology. 2018 Jun;287(3):893-900. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018171074. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
5
Diagnostic performance of US-based FNAB criteria of the 2020 Chinese guideline for malignant thyroid nodules: comparison with the 2017 American College of Radiology guideline, the 2015 American Thyroid Association guideline, and the 2016 Korean Thyroid Association guideline.2020年中国恶性甲状腺结节诊疗指南中基于超声的细针穿刺活检标准的诊断性能:与2017年美国放射学会指南、2015年美国甲状腺协会指南及2016年韩国甲状腺协会指南的比较
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021 Aug;11(8):3604-3618. doi: 10.21037/qims-20-1365.
6
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of ACR-TIRADS, American Thyroid Association (ATA), and EU-TIRADS guidelines in detecting thyroid malignancy.ACR-TIRADS、美国甲状腺协会(ATA)和 EU-TIRADS 指南在诊断甲状腺恶性肿瘤中的准确性比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2020 Dec;133:109390. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109390. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
7
Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasound-Based Risk Stratification Systems for Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于超声的甲状腺结节风险分层系统的诊断性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2023 Feb;38(1):117-128. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2023.1670. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
8
Comparison of Different Ultrasound Classification Systems of Thyroid Nodules for Identifying Malignant Potential: A Cross-sectional Study.不同甲状腺结节超声分类系统对良恶性潜能鉴别的比较:一项横断面研究。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2021 Jan 20;76:e2126. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2021/e2126. eCollection 2021.
9
Diagnostic performance of the modified Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System for thyroid malignancy according to nodule size: a comparison with five society guidelines.根据结节大小评估改良韩国甲状腺影像报告和数据系统对甲状腺恶性肿瘤的诊断效能:与五项学会指南的比较
Ultrasonography. 2021 Oct;40(4):474-485. doi: 10.14366/usg.20148. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
10
Diagnostic Value of Six Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (TIRADS) in Cytologically Equivocal Thyroid Nodules.六种甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(TIRADS)对甲状腺细针穿刺结果不明确结节的诊断价值
J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 17;9(7):2281. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072281.

引用本文的文献

1
Inconclusive cytology results of fine-needle aspiration for thyroid nodules: the importance of strict guideline implementation.甲状腺结节细针穿刺的不确定细胞学结果:严格执行指南的重要性。
Ultrasonography. 2025 Jul;44(4):285-293. doi: 10.14366/usg.24216. Epub 2025 May 13.
2
Superior Diagnostic Yield of Core Needle Biopsy Over Fine Needle Aspiration in Diagnosing Follicular-Patterned Neoplasms: A Multicenter Study Focusing on Bethesda IV Results.在诊断滤泡型肿瘤中,粗针活检的诊断效能优于细针穿刺抽吸:一项聚焦于贝塞斯达IV级结果的多中心研究
Korean J Radiol. 2025 Jun;26(6):604-615. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2024.1022. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnostic performance of the modified Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System for thyroid malignancy according to nodule size: a comparison with five society guidelines.根据结节大小评估改良韩国甲状腺影像报告和数据系统对甲状腺恶性肿瘤的诊断效能:与五项学会指南的比较
Ultrasonography. 2021 Oct;40(4):474-485. doi: 10.14366/usg.20148. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
2
Accuracy of thyroid imaging reporting and data system category 4 or 5 for diagnosing malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.甲状腺影像报告和数据系统分类 4 或 5 用于诊断恶性肿瘤的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Oct;30(10):5611-5624. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06875-w. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
3
The European Thyroid Imaging and Reporting Data System as a Remedy for the Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment of Thyroid Cancer: Results from the EUROCRINE Surgical Registry.
欧洲甲状腺影像与报告数据系统作为甲状腺癌过度诊断和过度治疗的一种补救措施:来自欧洲内分泌外科登记处的结果
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jun 17;16(12):2237. doi: 10.3390/cancers16122237.
4
Determining the Best Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System: A Prospective Study Comparing the Diagnostic Performance of ACR, EU, and K TIRADS in the Evaluation of Thyroid Nodules.确定最佳甲状腺影像报告和数据系统:一项前瞻性研究,比较美国放射学会(ACR)、欧洲(EU)和韩国(K)甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(TIRADS)在评估甲状腺结节时的诊断性能。
Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2023 Oct 13;34(2):220-231. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1775862. eCollection 2024 Apr.
5
Malignancy risk stratification and subcategorization of K-TIRADS intermediate suspicion thyroid nodules: a retrospective multicenter study.K-TIRADS中度可疑甲状腺结节的恶性风险分层及亚分类:一项回顾性多中心研究
Ultrasonography. 2024 Mar;43(2):132-140. doi: 10.14366/usg.23203. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
6
Diagnostic efficiency among Eu-/C-/ACR-TIRADS and S-Detect for thyroid nodules: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.超声弹性成像技术在甲状腺结节诊断中的应用价值:一项系统评价和网状 Meta 分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Aug 31;14:1227339. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1227339. eCollection 2023.
7
Comparison of diagnostic performance of two ultrasound risk stratification systems for thyroid nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis.两种甲状腺结节超声风险分层系统诊断性能的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Radiol Med. 2023 Nov;128(11):1407-1414. doi: 10.1007/s11547-023-01709-3. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
8
Delayed Cancer Diagnosis in Thyroid Nodules Initially Treated as Benign With Radiofrequency Ablation: Ultrasound Characteristics and Predictors for Cancer.射频消融治疗后最初诊断为良性的甲状腺结节中癌症的延迟诊断:超声特征和癌症预测因素。
Korean J Radiol. 2023 Sep;24(9):903-911. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2023.0386.
9
Subcategorization of intermediate suspicion thyroid nodules based on suspicious ultrasonographic findings.基于可疑超声检查结果对中度可疑甲状腺结节进行亚分类。
Ultrasonography. 2023 Apr;42(2):307-313. doi: 10.14366/usg.22096. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
10
Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasound-Based Risk Stratification Systems for Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于超声的甲状腺结节风险分层系统的诊断性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2023 Feb;38(1):117-128. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2023.1670. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
Thyroid Nodules with Isolated Macrocalcifications: Malignancy Risk of Isolated Macrocalcifications and Postoperative Risk Stratification of Malignant Tumors Manifesting as Isolated Macrocalcifications.
甲状腺孤立性大钙化结节:孤立性大钙化的恶性风险及表现为孤立性大钙化的恶性肿瘤术后危险分层。
Korean J Radiol. 2020 May;21(5):605-613. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0523.
4
Diagnostic Performance of Four Ultrasound Risk Stratification Systems: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.四种超声风险分层系统的诊断性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Thyroid. 2020 Aug;30(8):1159-1168. doi: 10.1089/thy.2019.0812. Epub 2020 May 19.
5
2019 Practice guidelines for thyroid core needle biopsy: a report of the Clinical Practice Guidelines Development Committee of the Korean Thyroid Association.2019年甲状腺粗针活检实践指南:韩国甲状腺协会临床实践指南制定委员会报告
J Pathol Transl Med. 2020 Jan;54(1):64-86. doi: 10.4132/jptm.2019.12.04. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
6
CT features of thyroid nodules with isolated macrocalcifications detected by ultrasonography.超声检测到的伴有孤立性粗大钙化的甲状腺结节的CT特征
Ultrasonography. 2020 Apr;39(2):130-136. doi: 10.14366/usg.19045. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
7
Concordance of Three International Guidelines for Thyroid Nodules Classified by Ultrasonography and Diagnostic Performance of Biopsy Criteria.超声检查分类的甲状腺结节三种国际指南的一致性和活检标准的诊断性能。
Korean J Radiol. 2020 Jan;21(1):108-116. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0215.
8
Similarities and Differences Between Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems.甲状腺影像报告和数据系统的异同
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Aug;213(2):W76-W84. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20510. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
9
Diagnostic Performance of Practice Guidelines for Thyroid Nodules: Thyroid Nodule Size versus Biopsy Rates.甲状腺结节临床实践指南的诊断性能:甲状腺结节大小与活检率。
Radiology. 2019 Apr;291(1):92-99. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019181723. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
10
Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasound-Based Risk-Stratification Systems for Thyroid Nodules: Comparison of the 2015 American Thyroid Association Guidelines with the 2016 Korean Thyroid Association/Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology and 2017 American College of Radiology Guidelines.基于超声的甲状腺结节风险分层系统的诊断性能:2015 年美国甲状腺协会指南与 2016 年韩国甲状腺协会/韩国甲状腺放射学会和 2017 年美国放射学会指南的比较。
Thyroid. 2018 Nov;28(11):1532-1537. doi: 10.1089/thy.2018.0094.