• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应对 COVID-19 的政策为全球卫生政策范式转变提供了一个契机:多源流框架作为一种启发式方法的应用。

Policy responses to COVID-19 present a window of opportunity for a paradigm shift in global health policy: An application of the Multiple Streams Framework as a heuristic.

机构信息

Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Takemi Program in International Health, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Glob Public Health. 2021 Aug-Sep;16(8-9):1187-1197. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2021.1925942. Epub 2021 May 27.

DOI:10.1080/17441692.2021.1925942
PMID:34044747
Abstract

Drawing on Kingdon's Multiple Streams Framework as a heuristic, this article reviews the three streams - problems, policies, and politics - as applied to the adoption of economic policies in response to the socioeconomic impacts of COVID-19. In doing so, we argue that we are currently presented with a window of opportunity to better address the social determinants of health. First, through assessing the problem stream, an understanding of inequity as a problem gained wider recognition through the disproportionate impacts of COVID-19. Second, in the policy stream, we demonstrate that appropriate and unprecedented policies can be enacted even in the face of changing evidence or evidentiary uncertainty, which are needed to address upstream factors that influence health. Lastly, in the politics stream, we demonstrate that addressing a public health 'problem' can be well-received by the public, making it politically viable. However, it is important to ensure the 'problem' is clearly relayed to the public and that this information is not perceived to change, as this can undermine trust. The social, political, and behavioural lessons presented by the COVID-19 pandemic should be drawn on in this pivotal moment for global public health.

摘要

本文借鉴金登的多源流框架作为启发式方法,回顾了问题流、政策流和政治流这三个流,探讨了为应对 COVID-19 对社会经济的影响而采用经济政策的情况。通过这样做,我们认为当前有机会更好地解决健康的社会决定因素。首先,通过评估问题流,我们认识到不平等是一个问题,因为 COVID-19 的影响不成比例。其次,在政策流中,我们展示了即使在证据或证据不确定性发生变化的情况下,也可以制定适当和前所未有的政策,这些政策是解决影响健康的上游因素所必需的。最后,在政治流中,我们证明了解决公共卫生“问题”可以得到公众的欢迎,这在政治上是可行的。但是,必须确保向公众清楚地传达“问题”,并且该信息不会被认为发生变化,因为这会破坏信任。在全球公共卫生的关键时刻,应借鉴 COVID-19 大流行带来的社会、政治和行为经验教训。

相似文献

1
Policy responses to COVID-19 present a window of opportunity for a paradigm shift in global health policy: An application of the Multiple Streams Framework as a heuristic.应对 COVID-19 的政策为全球卫生政策范式转变提供了一个契机:多源流框架作为一种启发式方法的应用。
Glob Public Health. 2021 Aug-Sep;16(8-9):1187-1197. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2021.1925942. Epub 2021 May 27.
2
Childhood obesity prevention policies in Iran: a policy analysis of agenda-setting using Kingdon's multiple streams.伊朗儿童肥胖预防政策:基于金登多源流理论的议程设置政策分析。
BMC Pediatr. 2021 May 27;21(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-02731-y.
3
Mandating influenza vaccinations for health care workers: analysing opportunities for policy change using Kingdon's agenda setting framework.强制医护人员接种流感疫苗:运用金登议程设置框架分析政策变革的机遇
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 29;16(1):522. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1772-0.
4
The comparative politics of COVID-19: The need to understand government responses.新冠疫情下的比较政治学:理解政府应对措施的必要性。
Glob Public Health. 2020 Sep;15(9):1413-1416. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2020.1783340. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
5
Agenda setting for essential medicines policy in sub-Saharan Africa: a retrospective policy analysis using Kingdon's multiple streams model.撒哈拉以南非洲基本药物政策的议程设定:运用金登多源流模型的回顾性政策分析
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 May 3;19(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00724-y.
6
Understanding political priority development for public health issues in Turkey: lessons from tobacco control and road safety.了解土耳其公共卫生问题的政治优先事项发展:从烟草控制和道路安全中吸取的教训。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Feb 6;17(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0412-7.
7
Kingdon's Multiple Streams Framework and the Analysis of Decision-Making Processes Regarding Publicly-Funded Immunization Programs.金登的多源流框架与公共资助免疫规划决策过程分析。
Expert Rev Vaccines. 2019 Jun;18(6):575-585. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2019.1627208. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
8
The analysis of the medical tourism expansion policy in Taiwan: a policy analysis using Kingdon's multiple streams.台湾医疗旅游扩张政策分析:基于金登多源流理论的政策分析
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Aug 14;22(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01180-0.
9
Politics and pandemics.政治与大流行病。
Glob Public Health. 2021 Aug-Sep;16(8-9):1131-1140. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2021.1947601.
10
Agenda-setting in policies related to high-risk sexual behaviours, stimulants, and alcohol abuse in Iranian adolescents.制定与伊朗青少年高危性行为、兴奋剂和酒精滥用相关政策的议程。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Oct 9;21(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01050-1.

引用本文的文献

1
How do high-level African directors of policy and planning operationalize health equity? Findings from a regional survey.非洲高级政策与规划主管如何实施卫生公平?一项区域调查的结果
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Mar 26;5(3):e0004384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004384. eCollection 2025.
2
How have PHEIC determinations changed since the COVID-19 pandemic? A document analysis of 101 WHO International Health Regulations Emergency Committees' statements.自新冠疫情以来,国际关注的突发公共卫生事件(PHEIC)的判定有何变化?对世界卫生组织国际卫生条例突发事件委员会的101份声明进行的文件分析。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 28;25(1):818. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22056-0.
3
Health equity and distributive justice: views of high-level African policymakers.
健康公平与分配正义:非洲高级政策制定者的观点
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Dec 23;25(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01154-5.
4
Health promotion, the social determinants of health, and urban health: what does a critical discourse analysis of World Health Organization texts reveal about health equity?健康促进、健康的社会决定因素与城市健康:对世界卫生组织文本的批判性话语分析揭示了哪些关于健康公平的内容?
BMC Glob Public Health. 2023 Dec 1;1(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s44263-023-00023-4.
5
The complexity of addressing equity in COVID-19-related global health governance and population health research priorities in Canada: a multilevel qualitative study.加拿大新冠肺炎相关全球卫生治理中的公平性问题及人口健康研究重点的复杂性:一项多层次定性研究
BMC Public Health. 2024 Dec 5;24(1):3381. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20893-z.
6
Achilles' heel: elderly COVID-19 vaccination policy in China.阿喀琉斯之踵:中国老年人的 COVID-19 疫苗接种政策。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Aug 5;22(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01155-1.
7
The influence of crisis on policy formulation: the case of alcohol regulation in South Africa during COVID-19 (2020-21).危机对政策制定的影响:以南非在新冠疫情期间(2020 - 2021年)的酒精管制为例。
Health Policy Plan. 2024 Aug 8;39(7):753-770. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czae055.
8
Practice-Based Research From the Frontlines: Selected Strategies for Reducing Health Disparities and Accelerating Progress Toward Health Equity in the United States.前线基于实践的研究:美国减少健康差距和加速实现健康公平进展的选定策略
Public Health Rep. 2024 Jul-Aug;139(1_suppl):3S-9S. doi: 10.1177/00333549241258944. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
9
Equity and gender mainstreaming in public policy: A scoping review protocol.公共政策中的公平与性别平等主流化:范围综述方案
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 23;19(2):e0299124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299124. eCollection 2024.
10
Assessing the governance environment for private sector engagement in health in Africa: Results from a multi-country survey.评估非洲私营部门参与卫生事务的治理环境:来自多国调查的结果。
J Glob Health. 2023 Oct 6;13:04113. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04113.