• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对快速抗原检测和 RT-PCR 获得的 COVID-19 诊断结果进行回顾性分析:对疾病管理的启示。

A retrospective analysis of COVID-19 diagnosis results obtained by rapid antigen tests and RT-PCR: Implications for disease management.

机构信息

Scientist-B, Department of Clinical Research, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health, Jehangir Merwanji Street, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India.

Scientist-B, Genetic Research Centre, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health, Jehangir Merwanji Street, Parel, Mumbai, 400012. India.

出版信息

Indian J Med Microbiol. 2021 Oct-Dec;39(4):537-539. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmmb.2021.05.006. Epub 2021 May 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijmmb.2021.05.006
PMID:34045083
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8143916/
Abstract

There is a need for understanding and establishment of the most appropriate testing algorithm for COVID-19 diagnosis in asymptomatic high-risk groups. Here, we present a retrospective analysis of RT-PCR results obtained from 412 cases tested negative for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) by rapid antigen testing method. Among 178 (43.2%) asymptomatic individuals, 44.9% of the high risk contacts, 12.2% of police custody individuals, 22.22% of the pregnant women and 33.33% of individuals hospitalised for preoperative or other medical conditions showed RT-PCR positivity. Our results suggest a need for focussed and intensive (multi-modality) testing in groups at high risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection.

摘要

对于无症状高危人群,需要了解并建立最适合 COVID-19 诊断的检测算法。在此,我们对通过快速抗原检测方法检测为新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)阴性的 412 例病例的 RT-PCR 结果进行回顾性分析。在 178 名(43.2%)无症状个体中,高风险接触者的 44.9%、被拘留者的 12.2%、孕妇的 22.22%和因术前或其他医疗条件住院的个体的 33.33%显示 RT-PCR 阳性。我们的结果表明,需要对 SARS-CoV-2 感染高风险人群进行集中和强化(多模式)检测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4633/8143916/dbc371af466e/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4633/8143916/dbc371af466e/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4633/8143916/dbc371af466e/gr1_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
A retrospective analysis of COVID-19 diagnosis results obtained by rapid antigen tests and RT-PCR: Implications for disease management.对快速抗原检测和 RT-PCR 获得的 COVID-19 诊断结果进行回顾性分析:对疾病管理的启示。
Indian J Med Microbiol. 2021 Oct-Dec;39(4):537-539. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmmb.2021.05.006. Epub 2021 May 25.
2
Accuracy and cost description of rapid antigen test compared with reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction for SARS-CoV-2 detection.快速抗原检测与逆转录-聚合酶链反应检测 SARS-CoV-2 的准确性和成本描述。
Dan Med J. 2021 Jun 14;68(7):A03210217.
3
Evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag rapid test device) for SARS-CoV-2 detection in asymptomatic close contacts of COVID-19 patients.评估一种用于检测 COVID-19 患者无症状密切接触者中 SARS-CoV-2 的快速抗原检测(Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag 快速检测设备)。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Apr;27(4):636.e1-636.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.12.022. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
4
[Retrospective analysis of the performance of the SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen detection test compared to the reference RT-PCR test].[严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型快速抗原检测试验与参考逆转录聚合酶链反应试验性能的回顾性分析]
Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2021 Apr 1;79(2):168-175. doi: 10.1684/abc.2021.1641.
5
Comparison of the SARS-CoV-2 Rapid antigen test to the real star Sars-CoV-2 RT PCR kit.比较 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测与 real star SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR 试剂盒。
J Virol Methods. 2021 Feb;288:114024. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2020.114024. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
6
Diagnostic strategies for SARS-CoV-2 infection and interpretation of microbiological results.SARS-CoV-2 感染的诊断策略和微生物学结果解读。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Sep;26(9):1178-1182. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.06.019. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
7
Portable RT-PCR System: a Rapid and Scalable Diagnostic Tool for COVID-19 Testing.便携式 RT-PCR 系统:用于 COVID-19 检测的快速可扩展诊断工具。
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Apr 20;59(5). doi: 10.1128/JCM.03004-20.
8
Predictors of SARS-CoV-2 Positivity Based on RT-PCR Swab Tests at a Drive-Through Outpatient Clinic for COVID-19 Screening in Japan.基于日本 COVID-19 筛查的 Drive-Through 门诊 RT-PCR 拭子检测的 SARS-CoV-2 阳性预测因素。
Tohoku J Exp Med. 2021 Feb;253(2):101-108. doi: 10.1620/tjem.253.101.
9
Use of the variplex™ SARS-CoV-2 RT-LAMP as a rapid molecular assay to complement RT-PCR for COVID-19 diagnosis.使用 variplex™ SARS-CoV-2 RT-LAMP 作为一种快速分子检测方法,与 RT-PCR 互补,用于 COVID-19 诊断。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Nov;132:104616. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104616. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
10
Rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2, replicating or non-replicating, using RT-PCR.采用 RT-PCR 快速检测 SARS-CoV-2,包括复制型和非复制型。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Mar;104:471-473. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.01.043. Epub 2021 Jan 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis by rapid antigen detection kit with RT-qPCR in a tertiary care setup in North Eastern India.在印度东北部的一家三级护理机构中,通过快速抗原检测试剂盒与 RT-qPCR 对 SARS-CoV-2 进行诊断的比较。
Indian J Med Microbiol. 2023 Mar-Apr;42:12-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmmb.2022.12.016. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
2
Direct Nasal Swab for Rapid Test and Saliva as an Alternative Biological Sample for RT-PCR in COVID-19 Diagnosis.直接鼻腔拭子用于快速检测,唾液可作为 COVID-19 诊断中 RT-PCR 的替代生物样本。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Dec 21;10(6):e0199822. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01998-22. Epub 2022 Dec 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of rapid antigen test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus.SARS-CoV-2 病毒快速抗原检测评估。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104500. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104500. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
2
Assay Techniques and Test Development for COVID-19 Diagnosis.用于新冠病毒诊断的检测技术与测试开发
ACS Cent Sci. 2020 May 27;6(5):591-605. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.0c00501. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
3
Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19.新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)患者的 SARS-CoV-2 抗体反应。
Nat Med. 2020 Jun;26(6):845-848. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0897-1. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
4
Comorbidity and its impact on 1590 patients with COVID-19 in China: a nationwide analysis.中国 COVID-19 患者 1590 例的合并症及其影响:一项全国性分析。
Eur Respir J. 2020 May 14;55(5). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00547-2020. Print 2020 May.