• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种统一的在线认知冲动测试组合,揭示了与现实世界冲动行为的关系。

A unified online test battery for cognitive impulsivity reveals relationships with real-world impulsive behaviours.

机构信息

School of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Turning Point, Eastern Health and Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Nov;5(11):1562-1577. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01127-3. Epub 2021 May 27.

DOI:10.1038/s41562-021-01127-3
PMID:34045720
Abstract

Impulsive behaviours are a major contributor to the global burden of disease, but existing measures of cognitive impulsivity have suboptimal reliability and validity. Here, we introduce the Cognitive Impulsivity Suite, comprising three computerized/online tasks using a gamified interface. We conceptualize rapid-response impulsive behaviours (disinhibition) as arising from the failure of three distinct cognitive mechanisms: attentional control, information gathering and monitoring/shifting. We demonstrate the construct and criterion validity of the Cognitive Impulsivity Suite in an online community sample (N = 1,056), show test-retest reliability and between-subjects variability in a face-to-face community sample (N = 63), and replicate the results in a community and clinical sample (N = 578). The results support the theoretical architecture of the attentional control, information gathering and monitoring/shifting constructs. The Cognitive Impulsivity Suite demonstrated incremental criterion validity for prediction of real-world, addiction-related problems and is a promising tool for large-scale research on cognitive impulsivity.

摘要

冲动行为是全球疾病负担的一个主要因素,但现有的认知冲动性衡量标准的可靠性和有效性并不理想。在这里,我们介绍认知冲动套件,它由三个使用游戏化界面的计算机化/在线任务组成。我们将快速反应冲动行为(抑制解除)的概念化为三个不同认知机制的失败:注意力控制、信息收集和监控/转移。我们在一个在线社区样本(N=1056)中证明了认知冲动套件的结构和标准有效性,在面对面的社区样本(N=63)中展示了测试-重测可靠性和受试者间的可变性,并在社区和临床样本(N=578)中复制了结果。结果支持注意力控制、信息收集和监控/转移结构的理论架构。认知冲动套件在预测与现实世界相关的成瘾问题方面表现出了增量标准有效性,是研究认知冲动性的一种很有前途的工具。

相似文献

1
A unified online test battery for cognitive impulsivity reveals relationships with real-world impulsive behaviours.一种统一的在线认知冲动测试组合,揭示了与现实世界冲动行为的关系。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Nov;5(11):1562-1577. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01127-3. Epub 2021 May 27.
2
Impulsivity in Multiplayer Online Battle Arena Gamers: Preliminary Results on Experimental and Self-Report Measures.多人在线战斗竞技游戏玩家的冲动性:关于实验和自我报告测量的初步结果
J Behav Addict. 2016 Jun;5(2):351-6. doi: 10.1556/2006.5.2016.028. Epub 2016 May 9.
3
The Hunger Games: Homeostatic State-Dependent Fluctuations in Disinhibition Measured with a Novel Gamified Test Battery.饥饿游戏:通过新型游戏化测试电池测量的去抑制的内稳态状态依赖性波动。
Nutrients. 2021 Jun 10;13(6):2001. doi: 10.3390/nu13062001.
4
The Digital Marshmallow Test (DMT) Diagnostic and Monitoring Mobile Health App for Impulsive Behavior: Development and Validation Study.数字棉花糖测试(DMT)诊断和监测冲动行为的移动健康应用程序:开发和验证研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jan 22;9(1):e25018. doi: 10.2196/25018.
5
Leveraging Online Treatment to Re-examine the Association Between Alcohol Use and Disinhibition.利用在线治疗重新检验饮酒与冲动控制障碍之间的关联。
Psicothema. 2024;36(1):15-25. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2022.516.
6
Puzzling with online games (BAM-COG): reliability, validity, and feasibility of an online self-monitor for cognitive performance in aging adults.在线游戏对认知的影响(BAM-COG):一种针对老年人认知表现的在线自我监测工具的信度、效度和可行性
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Dec 3;15(12):e270. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2860.
7
A multidimensional approach to impulsivity changes in mild Alzheimer's disease and control participants: cognitive correlates.多维方法研究轻度阿尔茨海默病和对照组参与者的冲动性变化:认知相关性。
Cortex. 2013 Jan;49(1):90-100. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.08.004. Epub 2011 Sep 2.
8
mPulse Mobile Sensing Model for Passive Detection of Impulsive Behavior: Exploratory Prediction Study.用于被动检测冲动行为的mPulse移动传感模型:探索性预测研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Jan 27;8(1):e25019. doi: 10.2196/25019.
9
Does cognitive control ability mediate the relationship between reward-related mechanisms, impulsivity, and maladaptive outcomes in adolescence and young adulthood?认知控制能力是否在青少年和青年期的奖励相关机制、冲动性和适应不良结果之间起中介作用?
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Jun;19(3):653-676. doi: 10.3758/s13415-019-00722-2.
10
Psychometric properties of a Spanish version of the UPPS-P impulsive behavior scale: reliability, validity and association with trait and cognitive impulsivity.西班牙语版 UPPS-P 冲动行为量表的心理测量特性:信度、效度及与特质和认知冲动性的关联。
J Pers Assess. 2010 Jan;92(1):70-7. doi: 10.1080/00223890903382369.

引用本文的文献

1
Trialing addiction neurocircuitry targets and directionality of brain stimulation effects: A deep TMS/fMRI trial in people with alcohol use disorder.试验成瘾神经回路靶点及脑刺激效应的方向性:一项针对酒精使用障碍患者的深部经颅磁刺激/功能磁共振成像试验。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2025 Jun 30;46:101515. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101515. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Transdiagnostic neuromodulation of impulsivity: current status and future trajectories.冲动性的跨诊断神经调节:现状与未来发展轨迹
Transl Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 23;15(1):209. doi: 10.1038/s41398-025-03415-2.
3
Risky decision-making and nonsuicidal self-injury among university students: Examining the role of criticism feedback.

本文引用的文献

1
Impulsivity traits and neurocognitive mechanisms conferring vulnerability to substance use disorders.冲动特质和导致物质使用障碍易感性的神经认知机制。
Neuropharmacology. 2021 Feb 1;183:108402. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2020.108402. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
2
Implications of the Lacking Relationship Between Cognitive Task and Self-report Measures for Psychiatry.认知任务与精神病学自我报告测量之间缺乏关联的影响
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2021 Jul;6(7):670-672. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2020.06.010. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
3
The drift diffusion model as the choice rule in inter-temporal and risky choice: A case study in medial orbitofrontal cortex lesion patients and controls.
大学生冒险决策和非自杀性自伤:考察批评反馈的作用。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 25;19(10):e0312081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312081. eCollection 2024.
4
Impulsivity is a stable, measurable, and predictive psychological trait.冲动性是一种稳定、可测量且可预测的心理特征。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jun 11;121(24):e2321758121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2321758121. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
5
Trait impulsivity influences behavioural and physiological responses to threat in a virtual environment.特质冲动性会影响在虚拟环境中对威胁的行为和生理反应。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 25;14(1):9484. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60300-6.
6
A Novel, Expert-Endorsed, Neurocognitive Digital Assessment Tool for Addictive Disorders: Development and Validation Study.一种新颖的、专家认可的、用于成瘾障碍的神经认知数字评估工具:开发和验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 25;25:e44414. doi: 10.2196/44414.
7
Searching for biomarkers in the fluidity of mental ill-health.在精神健康不佳的流动性中寻找生物标志物。
World Psychiatry. 2023 Jun;22(2):268-270. doi: 10.1002/wps.21083.
8
Improving the Reliability of Cognitive Task Measures: A Narrative Review.提高认知任务测量的可靠性:综述。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2023 Aug;8(8):789-797. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2023.02.004. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
9
Children's eating behaviours and related constructs: conceptual and theoretical foundations and their implications.儿童饮食行为及相关概念:概念和理论基础及其意义。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023 Feb 15;20(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01407-3.
10
Protocol for a cluster randomised crossover pilot trial of Goal Management Training (GMT) for methamphetamine use disorder.甲基苯丙胺使用障碍目标管理培训(GMT)集群随机交叉试点试验方案。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2022 Aug 11;29:100969. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100969. eCollection 2022 Oct.
时际与风险选择中的漂移扩散模型作为选择规则:内侧眶额皮层损伤患者与对照的病例研究。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Apr 20;16(4):e1007615. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007615. eCollection 2020 Apr.
4
Why Are Self-Report and Behavioral Measures Weakly Correlated?为什么自陈式测量和行为测量相关性较弱?
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Apr;24(4):267-269. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.007. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
5
Interference scores have inadequate concurrent and convergent validity: Should we stop using the flanker, Simon, and spatial Stroop tasks?干扰分数的同时效度和聚合效度不足:我们是否应该停止使用侧抑制任务、西蒙任务和空间 Stroop 任务?
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Feb 13;5(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-0207-y.
6
Questionnaires and task-based measures assess different aspects of self-regulation: Both are needed.问卷调查和基于任务的测评方法评估自我调节的不同方面:两者都不可或缺。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Dec 3;116(49):24396-24397. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1915315116. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
7
Neurocognitive assessment on a tablet device: Test-retest reliability and practice effects of ANAM Mobile.平板电脑设备上的神经认知评估:ANAM Mobile的重测信度及练习效应
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2021 May-Jun;28(3):363-371. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2019.1640698. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
8
Uncovering the structure of self-regulation through data-driven ontology discovery.通过数据驱动的本体发现揭示自我调节的结构。
Nat Commun. 2019 May 24;10(1):2319. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10301-1.
9
Reaction time in differential and developmental research: A review and commentary on the problems and alternatives.反应时在差异和发展研究中的应用:问题与替代方案述评。
Psychol Bull. 2019 May;145(5):508-535. doi: 10.1037/bul0000192. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
10
Large-scale analysis of test-retest reliabilities of self-regulation measures.大规模分析自我调节措施的重测信度。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 19;116(12):5472-5477. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1818430116. Epub 2019 Mar 6.