Baker John, Masood Mohd, Rahman Muhammad Aziz, Thornton Lukar, Begg Stephen
Department of Community and Allied Health, La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Australia.
Department of Dentistry and Oral Health, La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Australia.
Tob Induc Dis. 2021 May 19;19:39. doi: 10.18332/tid/134190. eCollection 2021.
An emerging body of research has developed around tobacco retailer density and its contribution to smoking behavior. This cross-sectional study aimed to determine the association between tobacco retailer density and smoking behavior in a rural Australian jurisdiction without a tobacco retailer licensing system in place.
A local government database (updated 2018) of listed tobacco retailers (n=93) was accessed and potential unlisted tobacco retailers (n=230) were added using online searches. All retailers (n=323) were visited in 2019 and GPS coordinates of retailers that sold tobacco (n=125) were assigned to suburbs in ArcMap. A community survey conducted in the Local Government Area provided smoking and sociodemographic data amongst adult respondents (n=8981). Associations between tobacco retailer density (calculated as the number of retailers per km based on respondents' suburb of residence) and daily, occasional and experimental smoking were assessed using multilevel logistic regression analysis. Separate models with and without covariates were undertaken.
Without adjusting for possible confounders, living in suburbs with greater retailer density did not increase the odds of daily smoking (OR=1.01; 95% CI: 0.92-1.12), occasional smoking (OR=1.05; 95% CI: 0.94-1.18), or experimental smoking (OR=0.98; 95% 0.92- 1.05). However, after adjustment, living in suburbs with greater retailer density increased the odds of occasional smoking behavior (AOR=1.37; 95% CI: 1.10-1.71) but not daily or experimental smoking.
This study found a significant positive association between tobacco retailer density and the likelihood of occasional smoking in a rural Australian jurisdiction without a tobacco retailer licensing system in place. The findings strengthen calls for the introduction of a comprehensive, positive tobacco retailer licensing system to provide a framework for improving compliance with legislation and to reduce the overall availability of tobacco products in the community.
围绕烟草零售商密度及其对吸烟行为的影响,已涌现出大量研究。本横断面研究旨在确定在澳大利亚一个未实施烟草零售商许可制度的农村辖区内,烟草零售商密度与吸烟行为之间的关联。
获取了一份当地政府的烟草零售商清单数据库(于2018年更新,共93家),并通过在线搜索补充了潜在的未登记烟草零售商(230家)。2019年对所有零售商(共323家)进行了走访,并在ArcMap中将销售烟草的零售商(125家)的GPS坐标标注到各个郊区。在当地政府辖区开展的一项社区调查收集了成年受访者(共8981人)的吸烟情况和社会人口统计学数据。使用多水平逻辑回归分析评估烟草零售商密度(根据受访者居住郊区每公里的零售商数量计算)与每日吸烟、偶尔吸烟和尝试吸烟之间的关联。分别构建了包含和不包含协变量的模型。
在不调整可能的混杂因素的情况下,居住在零售商密度较高郊区的人群,每日吸烟(比值比=1.01;95%置信区间:0.92 - 1.12)、偶尔吸烟(比值比=1.05;95%置信区间:0.94 - 1.18)或尝试吸烟(比值比=0.98;95%置信区间:0.92 - 1.05)的几率并未增加。然而,在进行调整后,居住在零售商密度较高郊区的人群偶尔吸烟行为的几率增加了(调整后比值比=1.37;95%置信区间:1.10 - 1.71),但每日吸烟或尝试吸烟的几率未增加。
本研究发现,在澳大利亚一个未实施烟草零售商许可制度的农村辖区内,烟草零售商密度与偶尔吸烟的可能性之间存在显著的正相关。这些发现进一步呼吁引入全面、积极的烟草零售商许可制度,以提供一个改善法规遵守情况的框架,并减少社区内烟草产品的总体可及性。