Garcia Karoline Soares, Facas Bianca Pocopetz, Machado Marta Brenner, Teixeira Fábio Vieira, Avedano Luisa, Lönnfors Sanna, Hossne Rogério Saad, Peyrin-Biroulet Laurent, Queiroz Natália Sousa Freitas
Department of Gastroenterology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, 255 Doutor Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar Avenue, São Paulo, SP 05403000, Brazil.
Department of Gastroenterology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil.
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2021 May 18;14:17562848211013249. doi: 10.1177/17562848211013249. eCollection 2021.
In this analysis we aimed to describe Brazilian inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients' knowledge and perceptions regarding biosimilars and compare with viewpoints from non-Brazilian patients.
An online survey consisting of 19 questions was made available by the European Federation of Crohn's and Ulcerative Colitis Associations between July 2018 and December 2018. Only respondents who had heard of biosimilars were asked to respond to all of the questions.
A total of 102 Brazilian IBD patients responded to the survey. The majority (78.4%) of patients had been exposed to anti-tumor-necrosis-factor drugs and 63.4% of them had heard of biosimilars. Brazilian respondents worried significantly more about biosimilars being less effective than the originator (62.5% 47.9%, value 0.03) and molecular differences between biosimilars and originators (53.1% 31.8, value 0.001) as compared with non-Brazilian IBD patients. The majority of Brazilian (75%) and non-Brazilian (64.1%) respondents thought that the lower cost of biosimilars should not come before their safety and efficacy ( value 0.09). In addition, 79.1% of Brazilian respondents believed that the arrival of biosimilars will have an impact on the management of IBD.
Brazilian patients reported higher rates of misconceptions regarding biosimilars than non-Brazilian IBD patients. Although patients still worry about different aspects regarding biosimilars, they also tend to be confident that biosimilars will have an impact on the management of their disease. With the recent approval of many biosimilars in Brazil and the imminent widespread use of these drugs, our data raise awareness for the need of providing patient education to prevent negative expectations toward switching to biosimilars.
在本分析中,我们旨在描述巴西炎症性肠病(IBD)患者对生物类似药的了解和看法,并与非巴西患者的观点进行比较。
2018年7月至2018年12月期间,欧洲克罗恩病和溃疡性结肠炎协会联合会开展了一项包含19个问题的在线调查。只有听说过生物类似药的受访者才被要求回答所有问题。
共有102名巴西IBD患者参与了该调查。大多数(78.4%)患者曾接触过抗肿瘤坏死因子药物,其中63.4%听说过生物类似药。与非巴西IBD患者相比,巴西受访者明显更担心生物类似药的疗效不如原研药(62.5%对47.9%,P值0.03)以及生物类似药与原研药之间的分子差异(53.1%对31.8%,P值0.001)。大多数巴西(75%)和非巴西(64.1%)受访者认为,生物类似药成本较低不应优先于其安全性和有效性(P值0.09)。此外,79.1%的巴西受访者认为生物类似药的出现将对IBD的管理产生影响。
与非巴西IBD患者相比,巴西患者对生物类似药的误解率更高。尽管患者仍对生物类似药的不同方面感到担忧,但他们也倾向于相信生物类似药将对其疾病的管理产生影响。随着巴西近期许多生物类似药获批以及这些药物即将广泛使用,我们的数据提高了对提供患者教育以防止对改用生物类似药产生负面期望的必要性的认识。