• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于主观体验考量聚乙二醇4000联合西甲硅油肠道准备方案的清洁效果及安全性:一项观察性研究

Cleansing efficacy and safety of bowel preparation protocol using sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate considering subjective experiences: An observational study.

作者信息

Liu Fang-Xun, Wang Li, Yan Wen-Jie, Zou Li-Chun, Cao Yue-An, Lin Xiang-Chun

机构信息

Department of International Medical Center, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing 102206, China.

Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing 102206, China.

出版信息

World J Clin Cases. 2021 May 26;9(15):3586-3596. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i15.3586.

DOI:10.12998/wjcc.v9.i15.3586
PMID:34046458
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8130092/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Research data from patient reports indicate that the least bearable part of colonoscopy is the administration of laxatives for bowel preparation.

AIM

To observe the intestinal cleansing efficacy and safety of sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate and to discuss the patients' experiences due to the procedure.

METHODS

Subjects hospitalized in the International Medical Center Ward of Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China, from April 29 to October 29, 2020, for whom the colonoscopy was planned, were enrolled. Bowel preparation was performed using sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate. The effect of bowel cleansing was evaluated according to the Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale, defecation conditions and adverse reactions were recorded, and the comfort level and subjective satisfaction concerning medication were evaluated by the visual analogue scale/score (VAS).

RESULTS

The bowel preparation procedure was planned for all patients enrolled, which included 42 males and 22 females. The results showed an average liquid rehydration volume of 3000 mL, an average onset of action for the first dose at 89.04 min, an average number of bowel movements of 4.3 following the first dose, an average onset of action for the second dose at 38.90 min and an average number of bowel movements of 5.0 after the second dose. The total average Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale score was 3.6, with 93.55% of bowel preparations in the "qualified" and 67.74% in the "excellent" grade. The average VAS score of effect on sleep was 0, and the average VAS score of perianal pain was also 0. The average VAS score for ease of taking and taste perception of the bowel cleanser was 10. Side effects included mild to moderate nausea (15.63%), mild vomiting (4.69%), mild to moderate abdominal pain (7.81%), mild to moderate abdominal distension (20.31%), mild palpitation (7.81%) and mild dizziness (4.69%).

CONCLUSION

Sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate is effective and safe for bowel preparation before colonoscopy with high subjective patient acceptance, thus improving overall patient compliance.

摘要

背景

来自患者报告的研究数据表明,结肠镜检查中最难以忍受的部分是用于肠道准备的泻药服用过程。

目的

观察聚乙二醇4000/枸橼酸镁的肠道清洁效果和安全性,并探讨患者在该过程中的体验。

方法

纳入2020年4月29日至10月29日在中国北京北京大学国际医院国际医疗中心病房住院且计划进行结肠镜检查的患者。采用聚乙二醇4000/枸橼酸镁进行肠道准备。根据渥太华肠道准备量表评估肠道清洁效果,记录排便情况和不良反应,并通过视觉模拟量表/评分(VAS)评估用药的舒适度和主观满意度。

结果

所有纳入患者均按计划进行了肠道准备,其中男性42例,女性22例。结果显示,平均补液量为3000 mL,首剂平均起效时间为89.04分钟,首剂后平均排便次数为4.3次,第二剂平均起效时间为38.90分钟,第二剂后平均排便次数为5.0次。渥太华肠道准备量表总平均分是3.6分,93.55%的肠道准备为“合格”,67.74%为“优秀”等级。对睡眠影响的平均VAS评分为0,肛周疼痛的平均VAS评分也为0。肠道清洁剂服用便利性和口感的平均VAS评分为10分。副作用包括轻度至中度恶心(15.63%)、轻度呕吐(4.69%)、轻度至中度腹痛(7.81%)、轻度至中度腹胀(20.31%)、轻度心悸(7.81%)和轻度头晕(4.69%)。

结论

聚乙二醇4000/枸橼酸镁在结肠镜检查前用于肠道准备有效且安全,患者主观接受度高,从而提高了患者的总体依从性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3cd/8130092/01edf88f9f6b/WJCC-9-3586-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3cd/8130092/01edf88f9f6b/WJCC-9-3586-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3cd/8130092/01edf88f9f6b/WJCC-9-3586-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Cleansing efficacy and safety of bowel preparation protocol using sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate considering subjective experiences: An observational study.基于主观体验考量聚乙二醇4000联合西甲硅油肠道准备方案的清洁效果及安全性:一项观察性研究
World J Clin Cases. 2021 May 26;9(15):3586-3596. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i15.3586.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Citrate for Bowel Preparation in a Physically Disabled Outpatient Population: A Randomized, Endoscopist-Blinded Comparison With Ascorbic Acid-Enriched Polyethylene Glycol Solution Plus Bisacodyl (The PICO-MOVI Study).在身体残疾的门诊人群中,以聚乙二醇电解质溶液联合比沙可啶作为对照,评价匹可硫酸钠/柠檬酸镁进行肠道准备的疗效和安全性:一项随机、内镜医师设盲比较的研究(PICO-MOVI 研究)。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Feb;61(2):239-249. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000956.
3
Efficacy and safety of same-day preparation with sodium picosulfate plus magnesium citrate on the day of colonoscopy for bowel preparation: Multicenter, single-arm, open-label study.同一天准备聚乙二醇电解质散加柠檬酸镁与当天行结肠镜检查肠道准备的疗效和安全性:多中心、单臂、开放标签研究。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Oct;39(10):2151-2157. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16660. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
4
Predicting Inadequate Bowel Preparation When Using Sodium Picosulfate plus Magnesium Citrate for Colonoscopy: Development and Validation of a Prediction Score.预测结肠镜检查中使用匹克硫酸钠联合柠檬酸镁时的肠道准备不足:预测评分的制定和验证。
Digestion. 2022;103(6):462-469. doi: 10.1159/000527312. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
5
Single-day sodium picosulfate and magnesium citrate versus split-dose polyethylene glycol for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy: A prospective randomized endoscopist-blinded trial.结肠镜检查前肠道准备:单日服用匹可硫酸钠和柠檬酸镁与分剂量服用聚乙二醇的对比研究:一项前瞻性随机内镜医师盲法试验
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Nov;30(11):1627-34. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13010.
6
Efficacy, tolerability and safety of a split-dose bowel cleansing regimen of magnesium citrate with sodium picosulfate - a phase IV clinical observational study.聚乙二醇电解质散联合枸橼酸镁在结肠镜检查前肠道准备中的应用:一项前瞻性、随机、开放、平行对照的临床研究
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2021 Sep;113(9):635-642. doi: 10.17235/reed.2020.7073/2020.
7
Effectiveness of Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Citrate (PICO) for Colonoscopy Preparation.聚乙二醇4000/枸橼酸镁(PICO)用于结肠镜检查肠道准备的有效性。
Ann Coloproctol. 2014 Oct;30(5):222-7. doi: 10.3393/ac.2014.30.5.222. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
8
A Randomized Trial Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy of Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Citrate and Polyethylene Glycol/Bisacodyl (The Bowklean Study).一项比较匹可硫酸钠/柠檬酸镁和聚乙二醇/比沙可啶(The Bowklean 研究)肠道清洁效果的随机试验。
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 27;10(1):5604. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62120-w.
9
Observational multicentric study to evaluate efficacy, adverse effects and acceptance of bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy with sodium picosulfate / magnesium citrate formulation CitraFleet®.一项多中心观察性研究,旨在评估使用比沙可啶/枸橼酸镁制剂CitraFleet®进行结肠镜检查前肠道清洁的疗效、不良反应及接受度。
Z Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan;54(1):19-25. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-104227. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
10
Clinical comparison of low-volume agents (oral sulfate solution and sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate) for bowel preparation: the EASE study.低容量制剂(口服硫酸溶液和匹可硫酸钠加枸橼酸镁)用于肠道准备的临床比较:EASE研究
Intest Res. 2019 Jul;17(3):413-418. doi: 10.5217/ir.2018.00156. Epub 2019 Apr 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Dietary Plant and Animal Protein Sources Oppositely Modulate Fecal and in Vegetarians and Omnivores.饮食中的植物性和动物性蛋白质来源对素食者和杂食者的粪便和有相反的调节作用。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Apr 27;10(2):e0204721. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02047-21. Epub 2022 Mar 14.

本文引用的文献

1
A Randomized Trial Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy of Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Citrate and Polyethylene Glycol/Bisacodyl (The Bowklean Study).一项比较匹可硫酸钠/柠檬酸镁和聚乙二醇/比沙可啶(The Bowklean 研究)肠道清洁效果的随机试验。
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 27;10(1):5604. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62120-w.
2
Choledochoduodenostomy: Outcomes and limitations.胆总管十二指肠吻合术:手术效果与局限性
Endosc Ultrasound. 2019 Nov 28;8(Suppl 1):S72-S78. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_62_19. eCollection 2019 Nov.
3
Artificial intelligence in pancreatic cancer: Toward precision diagnosis.
胰腺癌中的人工智能:迈向精准诊断
Endosc Ultrasound. 2019 Nov-Dec;8(6):357-359. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_76_19.
4
Relationship Between Portal HTN and Cirrhosis as a Cause for Diabetes.门静脉高压与肝硬化作为糖尿病病因之间的关系
J Transl Int Med. 2019 Apr 22;7(2):79-83. doi: 10.2478/jtim-2019-0009. eCollection 2019 Jun.
5
Progress and Current Status of Influenza Researches in China.中国流感研究的进展与现状
J Transl Int Med. 2019 Jul 11;7(2):53-58. doi: 10.2478/jtim-2019-0012. eCollection 2019 Jun.
6
Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2019.结肠镜检查的肠道准备:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)指南 - 更新 2019 年。
Endoscopy. 2019 Aug;51(8):775-794. doi: 10.1055/a-0959-0505. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
7
[Chinese guideline for bowel preparation for colonoscopy (2019, Shanghai)].[中国结肠镜检查肠道准备指南(2019年,上海)]
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Jul 1;58(7):485-495. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1426.2019.07.002.
8
Feasibility of EUS-guided shear-wave measurement: A preliminary clinical study.超声内镜引导下剪切波测量的可行性:一项初步临床研究。
Endosc Ultrasound. 2019 May-Jun;8(3):215-216. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_6_19.
9
Robotic ultrasound and ultrasonic robot.机器人超声与超声机器人。
Endosc Ultrasound. 2019 Jan-Feb;8(1):1-2. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_69_18.
10
Same-Day Single Dose of 2 Liter Polyethylene Glycol is Not Inferior to The Standard Bowel Preparation Regimen in Low-Risk Patients: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.低危患者当日单剂量 2 升聚乙二醇与标准肠道准备方案无差异:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Apr;113(4):601-610. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2018.25. Epub 2018 Mar 13.