Li Hui Helen, Zhang Lawrence Jun
School of Foreign Languages, Wuhan University of Technology, Hongshan District, Wuhan, China.
Faculty of Education & Social Work, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
PLoS One. 2021 May 28;16(5):e0251569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251569. eCollection 2021.
Prior studies have reported inconsistent findings with regard to the effects of small-group student talk on developing individual students' English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) writing ability. To further explore the question under discussion, we designed a quasi-experimental study that included a pretest, a posttest, and a delayed posttest, and implemented it in two English-major groups at a university in China. We randomly assigned the students to an intervention group and a comparison group to investigate whether employing structured small-group student talk as collaborative prewriting discussions would effectively facilitate individual students' EFL writing development and whether such effects could be retained. The immediate and sustained effects after the quasi-experimental study was completed were measured by the analytic scores on five components of the writing task (content, organization, vocabulary, language, and mechanics) and the holistic writing scores cumulated of all these components. Statistical analyses revealed that the two groups were significantly distinguished by their analytic and holistic scores, indicating that students in the intervention group outperformed their comparison group peers in writing performance. The effects of collaborative prewriting discussions in the form of structured small-group student talk were found statistically significant in facilitating students' writing improvement in the content, organization, vocabulary, and language use, but not mechanics. The effects on content, organization, and vocabulary were retained as seen from the delayed posttest, while those on language use were not. The comparison group showed little improvement in their writing performance across the three tests. We concluded this study with a discussion on the implications for English-as-a-second/foreign-language (L2) writing instruction.
先前的研究报告了关于小组学生讨论对培养个体学生的外语(EFL)写作能力的影响的不一致的研究结果。为了进一步探讨正在讨论的问题,我们设计了一项准实验研究,该研究包括前测、后测和延迟后测,并在中国一所大学的两个英语专业班级中实施。我们将学生随机分配到干预组和对照组,以调查采用结构化的小组学生讨论作为协作式写作前讨论是否能有效促进个体学生的外语写作发展,以及这种效果是否能得以保持。准实验研究完成后的即时和持续效果通过写作任务五个组成部分(内容、组织、词汇、语言和语法)的分析得分以及所有这些组成部分累积的整体写作得分来衡量。统计分析表明,两组在分析得分和整体得分上有显著差异,这表明干预组的学生在写作表现上优于对照组的同龄人。以结构化的小组学生讨论形式进行的协作式写作前讨论在促进学生在内容、组织、词汇和语言运用方面的写作提高上具有统计学意义,但在语法方面没有。从延迟后测来看,对内容、组织和词汇的影响得以保持,而对语言运用的影响则没有。对照组在这三项测试中的写作表现几乎没有提高。我们以对第二语言/外语(L2)写作教学的启示的讨论结束了这项研究。