Suppr超能文献

与私营行业共享行政健康数据:两次公民陪审团的报告。

Sharing administrative health data with private industry: A report on two citizens' juries.

机构信息

Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values (ACHEEV), School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.

Macquarie Law School, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2021 Aug;24(4):1337-1348. doi: 10.1111/hex.13268. Epub 2021 May 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is good evidence of both community support for sharing public sector administrative health data in the public interest and concern about data security, misuse and loss of control over health information, particularly if private sector organizations are the data recipients. To date, there is little research describing the perspectives of informed community members on private sector use of public health data and, particularly, on the conditions under which that use might be justified.

METHODS

Two citizens' juries were held in February 2020 in two locations close to Sydney, Australia. Jurors considered the charge: 'Under what circumstances is it permissible for governments to share health data with private industry for research and development?'

RESULTS

All jurors, bar one, in principle supported sharing government administrative health data with private industry for research and development. The support was conditional and the juries' recommendations specifying these conditions related closely to the concerns they identified in deliberation.

CONCLUSION

The outcomes of the deliberative processes suggest that informed Australian citizens are willing to accept sharing their administrative health data, including with private industry, providing the intended purpose is clearly of public benefit, sharing occurs responsibly in a framework of accountability, and the data are securely held.

PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

The design of the jury was guided by an Advisory Group including representatives from a health consumer organization. The jurors themselves were selected to be descriptively representative of their communities and with independent facilitation wrote the recommendations.

摘要

背景

社区对出于公共利益共享公共部门行政健康数据表示支持,同时也对数据安全、滥用和失去对健康信息的控制表示担忧,尤其是如果私营部门组织是数据接收者。迄今为止,很少有研究描述知情社区成员对私营部门使用公共卫生数据的看法,尤其是在什么情况下可以合理使用这些数据。

方法

2020 年 2 月,在澳大利亚悉尼附近的两个地点举行了两次公民陪审团。陪审员审议的指控是:“在什么情况下,政府允许将健康数据与私营企业共享用于研究和开发?”

结果

除了一名陪审员外,所有陪审员原则上都支持政府将行政健康数据与私营企业共享用于研究和开发。这种支持是有条件的,陪审团的建议具体规定了这些条件,这些条件与他们在审议中确定的关切密切相关。

结论

审议过程的结果表明,澳大利亚知情公民愿意接受共享他们的行政健康数据,包括与私营企业共享,前提是预期目的明确是为了公共利益,在问责制框架内负责任地共享,并且数据安全保存。

患者和公众的贡献

陪审团的设计由一个包括卫生消费者组织代表在内的咨询小组指导。陪审员是根据社区的描述性代表性选择的,他们在独立的主持下撰写了建议。

相似文献

4
Do consumer voices in health-care citizens' juries matter?医疗保健公民陪审团中的消费者声音重要吗?
Health Expect. 2016 Oct;19(5):1015-22. doi: 10.1111/hex.12397. Epub 2015 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验