Rabinowitz Matthew J, Kohn Taylor P, Ellimoottil Chad, Alam Ridwan, Liu James L, Herati Amin S
The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Department of Urology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Sex Med. 2021 Jun;9(3):100366. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2021.100366. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
Telemedicine has the potential to improve access to care; however, its utility in the field of sexual medicine remains in question.
To examine the importance of video visits for the treatment of male sexual medicine at our academic center during the period of peak telemedicine use in April 2020.
We collected and compared deidentified data from all nonprocedure, adult outpatient encounters conducted as either office visits in April 2019 (n = 1,949) or video visits in April 2020 (n = 608). The primary International Classification of Diseases codes (ICD-10) labeled as diagnoses from all encounters were collected, with most encounters linked to several disease codes (n = 4,584). Demographic data were also collected. We performed comparative analyses on Stata (College Station, TX, USA) with significance set at α = .05.
Disease codes were categorized based on their use and classification in urological care and the proportion that each category made up within the outpatient practice was calculated.
In comparison to the office visits, which took place in April 2019, male sexual medicine visits in April 2020, during the peak of telemedicine use, made up a significantly larger overall share of our practice (P = .012), defined by relative rises in encounters pertaining to male hypogonadism, infertility, penile abnormalities, and testicular abnormalities. Outpatients seen over video visits were also younger than outpatients seen during the previous year over office visits (58.9 vs 60.8, P = .008). Further, race and ethnicity characteristics in the outpatient population were unaffected during the period of telemedicine use.
During the period of historically high telemedicine use following the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak, encounters associated with male sexual medicine made up a significantly larger portion of our outpatient practice. Although the full influence of the COVID-19 pandemic cannot be delineated, our findings suggest telemedicine use is compatible with the field of sexual medicine. Rabinowitz MJ, Kohn TP, Ellimoottil C, et al. The Impact of Telemedicine on Sexual Medicine at a Major Academic Center During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sex Med 2021;9:100366.
远程医疗有改善医疗服务可及性的潜力;然而,其在性医学领域的效用仍存疑问。
考察在2020年4月远程医疗使用高峰期间,视频问诊在我们学术中心男性性医学治疗中的重要性。
我们收集并比较了2019年4月门诊就诊(n = 1949)或2020年4月视频问诊(n = 608)的所有非手术成人门诊病例的去识别化数据。收集了所有病例中标记为诊断的主要国际疾病分类代码(ICD - 10),大多数病例与多个疾病代码相关(n = 4584)。还收集了人口统计学数据。我们在美国德克萨斯州大学城的Stata软件上进行了比较分析,显著性设定为α = 0.05。
根据疾病代码在泌尿外科护理中的用途和分类进行分组,并计算每组在门诊业务中所占的比例。
与2019年4月的门诊就诊相比,在2020年4月远程医疗使用高峰期间的男性性医学就诊在我们的业务中所占的总体份额显著更大(P = 0.012),这表现为与男性性腺功能减退、不育症、阴茎异常和睾丸异常相关的就诊病例相对增加。通过视频问诊的门诊患者也比上一年通过门诊就诊的患者更年轻(58.9对60.8,P = 0.008)。此外,在远程医疗使用期间,门诊患者的种族和民族特征未受影响。
在严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)疫情后远程医疗使用历史高位期间,与男性性医学相关的就诊病例在我们的门诊业务中占比显著更大。尽管无法明确2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行的全面影响,但我们的研究结果表明远程医疗的使用与性医学领域是兼容的。拉比诺维茨MJ、科恩TP、埃利莫蒂尔C等。COVID-19大流行期间远程医疗对一家主要学术中心性医学的影响。性医学2021;9:100366 。