Suppr超能文献

经皮椎弓根螺钉固定与微创 Wiltse 入路椎弓根螺钉固定治疗神经功能正常的胸腰椎骨折的疗效比较:一项回顾性研究。

Comparison of outcome between percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and the Mini-Open Wiltse Approach with pedicle screw fixation for neurologically intact thoracolumbar fractures: A retrospective study.

机构信息

Department of Spine Surgery, Seventh People's Hospital of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China.

Department of Orthopedics, Seventh People's Hospital of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China.

出版信息

J Orthop Sci. 2022 May;27(3):594-599. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2021.03.012. Epub 2021 May 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome between percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) and the mini-open Wiltse approach with pedicle screw fixation (MWPSF) for neurologically intact thoracolumbar fractures.

METHODS

From January 2017 to January 2019, ninety-four patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar fractures were included in this study. In this retrospective study, forty-nine patients were operated with the PPSF and forty-five patients received MWPSF. The clinical information, surgery-related results and radiographic outcome were collected and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the two groups in total length of incisions, blood loss, post-operative hospitalization time, visual analog scale (VAS) score and Oswestry disability index (ODI) score. There was also no significant difference in the accuracy rate of pedicle screw placement between two groups; however, the facet joint violation (FJV) was significantly higher in the PPSF group. The atrophic area of multifidus muscle in the PPSF group is significantly larger than that in the MWPSF group and the operative time of MWPSF group was shorter than that in the PPSF group. Meanwhile, the PPSF group obtaining significantly more cumulative exposure to radiation (p < 0.001). The result of vertebral body angle (VBA), Cobb's angle and AVH rate in the MWPSF group were significantly better than those in the PPSF group at the last post-operative follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Both minimally invasive treatment techniques (PPSF and MWPSF) are safe and effective in treatment of neurologically intact thoracolumbar fractures. Nevertheless, our results indicate that MWPSF may be a better choice for neurologically intact thoracolumbar fractures, since it protects multifidus muscle, and decreases facet joint violation, operation time, as well as radiation exposure. In addition, MWPSF was associated with better reduction of kyphosis.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较经皮椎弓根螺钉固定(PPSF)与微创 Wiltse 入路椎弓根螺钉固定(MWPSF)治疗神经完整的胸腰椎骨折的疗效。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入了 2017 年 1 月至 2019 年 1 月期间 94 例神经完整的胸腰椎骨折患者。在本研究中,49 例患者接受 PPSF 治疗,45 例患者接受 MWPSF 治疗。收集并比较两组患者的临床资料、手术相关结果和影像学结果。

结果

两组患者的切口总长度、术中出血量、术后住院时间、视觉模拟评分(VAS)和 Oswestry 功能障碍指数(ODI)评分均无显著差异。两组患者椎弓根螺钉置钉准确率也无显著差异;然而,PPSF 组的关节突关节损伤(FJV)发生率明显更高。PPSF 组多裂肌萎缩面积明显大于 MWPSF 组,MWPSF 组的手术时间也短于 PPSF 组。同时,PPSF 组患者的累积辐射暴露量明显更高(p<0.001)。MWPSF 组在末次随访时的椎体角度(VBA)、Cobb 角和 AVH 率均明显优于 PPSF 组。

结论

两种微创治疗技术(PPSF 和 MWPSF)治疗神经完整的胸腰椎骨折均安全有效。然而,我们的结果表明,MWPSF 可能是治疗神经完整的胸腰椎骨折的更好选择,因为它可以保护多裂肌,减少关节突关节损伤、手术时间和辐射暴露。此外,MWPSF 还能更好地矫正后凸畸形。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验