School of Psychology, Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
School of Psychology, Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2021 May 28;11(5):e043224. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043224.
Informal family caregivers play a crucial role in cancer care. Effective caregiver involvement in cancer care can improve both patient and caregiver outcomes. Despite this, interventions improving the caregiver involvement are sparse. This protocol describes a randomised controlled trial evaluating the combined effectiveness of novel online caregiver communication education modules for: (1) oncology clinicians () and (2) patients with cancer and caregivers ().
Thirty medical/radiation/surgical oncology or haematology doctors and nurses will be randomly allocated to either intervention () or control (an website on caregivers) education conditions. Following completion of education, each clinician will recruit nine patient-caregiver pairs, who will be allocated to the same condition as their recruiting clinician. Eligibility includes any new adult patient diagnosed with any type/stage cancer attending consultations with a caregiver. Approximately 270 patient-caregiver pairs will be recruited. The primary outcome is caregiver self-efficacy in triadic (clinician-patient-caregiver) communication. Patient and clinician self-efficacy in triadic communication are secondary outcomes. Additional secondary outcomes for clinicians include preferences for caregiver involvement, perceived module usability/acceptability, analysis of module use, satisfaction with the module, knowledge of strategies and feedback interviews. Secondary outcomes for caregivers and patients include preferences for caregiver involvement, satisfaction with clinician communication, distress, quality of life, healthcare expenditure, perceived module usability/acceptability and analysis of module use. A subset of patients and caregivers will complete feedback interviews. Secondary outcomes for caregivers include preparedness for caregiving, patient-caregiver communication and caring experience. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, and 1 week, 12 weeks and 26 weeks post-intervention.
Ethical approval has been received by the Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (REGIS project ID number: 2019/PID09787), with site-specific approval from each recruitment site. Protocol V.7 (dated 1 September 2020) is currently approved and reported in this manuscript. Findings will be disseminated via presentations and peer-reviewed publications. Engagement with clinicians, media, government, consumers and peak cancer groups will facilitate widespread dissemination and long-term availability of the educational modules.
ACTRN12619001507178.
非正规家庭护理人员在癌症护理中发挥着关键作用。有效的护理人员参与癌症护理可以改善患者和护理人员的结局。尽管如此,改善护理人员参与的干预措施仍然很少。本方案描述了一项随机对照试验,评估新型在线护理人员沟通教育模块对以下方面的综合效果:(1)肿瘤临床医生和(2)癌症患者和护理人员。
将 30 名医学/放射/外科肿瘤学或血液学医生和护士随机分配到干预组()或对照组(关于护理人员的网站)教育条件。教育完成后,每位临床医生将招募 9 对患者-护理人员,他们将被分配到与招募临床医生相同的条件下。符合条件的包括任何新确诊为任何类型/阶段癌症并与护理人员一起就诊的成年患者。大约 270 对患者-护理人员将被招募。主要结局是护理人员在三方(临床医生-患者-护理人员)沟通中的自我效能。患者和临床医生在三方沟通中的自我效能是次要结局。临床医生的其他次要结局包括对护理人员参与的偏好、对模块可用性/可接受性的感知、模块使用分析、对模块的满意度、对策略的了解和反馈访谈。护理人员和患者的其他次要结局包括对护理人员参与的偏好、对临床医生沟通的满意度、困扰、生活质量、医疗支出、对模块可用性/可接受性的感知以及模块使用分析。患者和护理人员的一部分将完成反馈访谈。护理人员的次要结局包括护理准备、患者-护理人员沟通和护理体验。评估将在基线、干预后 1 周、12 周和 26 周进行。
悉尼地方卫生区人体研究伦理委员会(REGIS 项目 ID 号:2019/PID09787)已批准伦理,每个招募地点均获得了特定地点的批准。本方案目前采用的是第 V.7 版(日期为 2020 年 9 月 1 日),并在本文中进行了报告。研究结果将通过演讲和同行评议的出版物进行传播。与临床医生、媒体、政府、消费者和癌症高峰组织的合作将促进教育模块的广泛传播和长期可用性。
ACTRN12619001507178。