• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为社区中使用呼吸机的个体的家庭照顾者开发基于网络的同伴支持项目:一项试点随机对照试验的方案

Development of a Web-Based Peer Support Program for Family Caregivers of Ventilator-Assisted Individuals Living in the Community: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Wasilewski Marina B, Nonoyama Mika, Dale Craig, McKim Douglas A, Road Jeremy, Leasa David, Goldstein Roger, Rose Louise

机构信息

Lawrence S Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, ON, Canada.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Feb 6;8(2):e11827. doi: 10.2196/11827.

DOI:10.2196/11827
PMID:30724737
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6386648/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Across Europe, Canada, Australia, and the United States, the prevalence of home mechanical ventilation (HMV) prevalence is 6.6-12.9 per 100,000. At-home ventilator-assisted individuals (VAIs) are often vulnerable and highly comorbid, requiring complex care. In Canada, most VAI care is provided by family, leading to poor health-related quality of life and increased caregiver burden. No supportive interventions or peer support programs are tailored to VAI caregivers. Owing to the financial, geographic, and time limitations, Web-based support delivery may especially meet VAI family caregiver needs. We have developed a peer mentor training and Web-based peer support program for VAI caregivers including information-sharing, peer-to-peer communication, and peer mentorship.

OBJECTIVE

Study Stage 1 aims to (1) evaluate the face and content validity of the peer mentor training program and (2) investigate participant satisfaction. Study Stage 2 aims to evaluate (1) the feasibility of participant recruitment and Web-based program delivery; (2) acceptability, usability, and satisfactoriness; (3) experiences of caregivers and peer mentors with the Web-based peer support program; and (4) effect of the Web-based peer support program on caregiver health outcomes.

METHODS

Study Stage 1: We will train 7 caregivers to act as peer mentors for the Web-based peer support program trial; they will complete questionnaires rating the utility of individual training sessions and the training program overall. Study Stage 2: We will recruit 30 caregiver peers for a pilot randomized controlled trial of the 12-week Web-based peer support program using a waitlist control; the program includes private chat, a public discussion forum, and weekly moderated chats. Caregiver peers will be randomized to the intervention or waitlist control group using a 1:1 ratio using Randomize.net. Both groups will complete pre- and postintervention health outcome questionnaires (ie, caregiving impact, mastery, coping, personal gain, positive affect, and depression). Caregiver peers in the intervention arm will only complete a program evaluation and will be invited to participate in an interview to provide insight into their experience. Peer mentors will be invited to participate in a Web-based focus group to provide insight into their experience as mentors. We will judge the feasibility per the number of recruitment and program delivery goals met, use analysis of covariance to compare health outcomes between intervention and control groups, and analyze qualitative data thematically.

RESULTS

Peer mentor training was completed with 5 caregivers in July 2018. To date, 2 caregivers have beta-tested the website, and the Web-based peer support program trial will commence in September 2018. Results are expected by early 2019.

CONCLUSIONS

This study will result in the production and initial evaluation of a rigorously developed, evidence- and stakeholder-informed Web-based peer training and peer support program for caregivers of VAIs residing at home.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/11827.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f86/6386648/121d52fa7754/resprot_v8i2e11827_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f86/6386648/73451a665cf0/resprot_v8i2e11827_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f86/6386648/4856c89ff105/resprot_v8i2e11827_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f86/6386648/c20827faa244/resprot_v8i2e11827_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f86/6386648/121d52fa7754/resprot_v8i2e11827_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f86/6386648/73451a665cf0/resprot_v8i2e11827_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f86/6386648/4856c89ff105/resprot_v8i2e11827_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f86/6386648/c20827faa244/resprot_v8i2e11827_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f86/6386648/121d52fa7754/resprot_v8i2e11827_fig4.jpg
摘要

背景

在欧洲、加拿大、澳大利亚和美国,家庭机械通气(HMV)的患病率为每10万人6.6 - 12.9例。在家中使用呼吸机辅助的个体(VAIs)往往较为脆弱且合并症较多,需要复杂的护理。在加拿大,大多数VAIs的护理由家人提供,这导致与健康相关的生活质量较差,护理人员负担加重。目前没有专门针对VAIs护理人员的支持性干预措施或同伴支持项目。由于经济、地理和时间限制,基于网络的支持服务可能特别能满足VAIs家庭护理人员的需求。我们为VAIs护理人员开发了一个同伴导师培训和基于网络的同伴支持项目,包括信息共享、 peer-to-peer通信和同伴指导。

目的

研究阶段1旨在(1)评估同伴导师培训项目的表面效度和内容效度,以及(2)调查参与者的满意度。研究阶段2旨在评估(1)参与者招募和基于网络的项目实施的可行性;(2)可接受性、可用性和满意度;(3)护理人员和同伴导师参与基于网络的同伴支持项目的体验;以及(4)基于网络的同伴支持项目对护理人员健康结果的影响。

方法

研究阶段1:我们将培训7名护理人员作为基于网络的同伴支持项目试验的同伴导师;他们将完成问卷,对各个培训课程以及整个培训项目的效用进行评分。研究阶段2:我们将招募30名护理人员同伴,对为期12周的基于网络的同伴支持项目进行试点随机对照试验,采用等待名单对照;该项目包括私人聊天、公共讨论论坛和每周的主持聊天。护理人员同伴将使用Randomize.net以1:1的比例随机分配到干预组或等待名单对照组。两组都将完成干预前后的健康结果问卷(即护理影响、掌握程度、应对方式、个人收获、积极情绪和抑郁)。干预组的护理人员同伴只需完成项目评估,并将被邀请参加访谈,以深入了解他们的体验。同伴导师将被邀请参加基于网络的焦点小组讨论,以深入了解他们作为导师的体验。我们将根据达到的招募人数和项目实施目标来判断可行性,使用协方差分析比较干预组和对照组之间的健康结果,并对定性数据进行主题分析。

结果

2018年7月,5名护理人员完成了同伴导师培训。迄今为止,2名护理人员对网站进行了测试,基于网络的同伴支持项目试验将于2018年9月开始。预计2019年初得出结果。

结论

本研究将产生并初步评估一个经过严格开发、基于证据且考虑了利益相关者意见的、针对在家居住的VAIs护理人员 的基于网络的同伴培训和同伴支持项目。

国际注册报告识别号(IRRID):PRR1-10.2196/11827。

相似文献

1
Development of a Web-Based Peer Support Program for Family Caregivers of Ventilator-Assisted Individuals Living in the Community: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.为社区中使用呼吸机的个体的家庭照顾者开发基于网络的同伴支持项目:一项试点随机对照试验的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Feb 6;8(2):e11827. doi: 10.2196/11827.
2
The experience of family caregivers of ventilator-assisted individuals who participated in a pilot web-based peer support program: A qualitative study.参与一项基于网络的同伴支持试点项目的呼吸机辅助患者家庭照顾者的经历:一项定性研究。
Digit Health. 2022 Nov 25;8:20552076221134964. doi: 10.1177/20552076221134964. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
3
Peer Mentoring Program for Informal Caregivers of Homebound Individuals With Advanced Parkinson Disease (Share the Care): Protocol for a Single-Center, Crossover Pilot Study.针对晚期帕金森病居家患者非正式照护者的同伴辅导计划(分享关爱):单中心交叉试点研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 May 26;11(5):e34750. doi: 10.2196/34750.
4
A Remotely Delivered, Peer-Led Physical Activity Intervention for Younger Breast Cancer Survivors (Pink Body Spirit): Protocol for a Feasibility Study and Mixed Methods Process Evaluation.一项针对年轻乳腺癌幸存者的远程提供、同伴主导的身体活动干预措施(粉红身体精神):可行性研究与混合方法过程评估方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Jul 8;9(7):e18420. doi: 10.2196/18420.
5
Digital peer-to-peer support programme for informal caregivers of people living with motor neuron disease: study protocol for a multi-centre parallel group, single-blinded (outcome assessor) randomised controlled superiority trial.数字点对点支持计划为生活在运动神经元疾病患者的非正式照顾者:多中心平行组、单盲(结局评估者)随机对照优势试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Feb 20;24(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07124-3.
6
Learning to PERSEVERE: A pilot study of peer mentor support and caregiver education in Lewy body dementia.学会坚持:路易体痴呆症同伴导师支持和照护者教育的初步研究。
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2023 Aug;113:105492. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2023.105492. Epub 2023 Jun 24.
7
Mindfulness-Based App to Reduce Stress in Caregivers of Persons With Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias: Protocol for a Single-Blind Feasibility Proof-of-Concept Randomized Controlled Trial.基于正念的应用程序减轻阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症患者照料者的压力:单盲可行性概念验证随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Oct 13;12:e50108. doi: 10.2196/50108.
8
Caregiver-Focused, Web-Based Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (Part 2).以照顾者为中心的基于网络的干预措施:系统评价与荟萃分析(第2部分)
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Oct 26;20(10):e11247. doi: 10.2196/11247.
9
Effectiveness of a nurse-delivered (FOCUS+) and a web-based (iFOCUS) psychoeducational intervention for people with advanced cancer and their family caregivers (DIAdIC): study protocol for an international randomized controlled trial.护士主导的(FOCUS+)和基于网络的(iFOCUS)心理教育干预对晚期癌症患者及其家庭照护者的有效性(DIAdIC):一项国际随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Dec 28;20(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00895-z.
10
Increasing preparedness for caregiving and death in family caregivers of patients with severe illness who are cared for at home - study protocol for a web-based intervention.提高居家重病患者家属对护理和死亡的准备度 - 一项基于网络的干预研究方案。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Mar 17;19(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-0530-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Family Caregivers of Individuals With Neuromuscular Disease Participating in a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Digital Peer Support Program: Nested Qualitative Study.参与数字同伴支持计划随机对照试验的神经肌肉疾病患者的家庭照顾者:嵌套定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 28;27:e72141. doi: 10.2196/72141.
2
The experience of family caregivers of ventilator-assisted individuals who participated in a pilot web-based peer support program: A qualitative study.参与一项基于网络的同伴支持试点项目的呼吸机辅助患者家庭照顾者的经历:一项定性研究。
Digit Health. 2022 Nov 25;8:20552076221134964. doi: 10.1177/20552076221134964. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Transitions to Home Mechanical Ventilation: The Experiences of Canadian Ventilator-Assisted Adults and Their Family Caregivers.向家庭机械通气的过渡:加拿大使用呼吸机辅助的成年人及其家庭照顾者的经历。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018 Mar 1;15(3):357-364. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201708-663OC. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
2
Facilitating mental health help-seeking by young adults with a dedicated online program: a feasibility study of Link.通过一个专门的在线项目促进年轻人寻求心理健康帮助:Link的可行性研究
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 9;7(7):e015303. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015303.
3
Web-based health interventions for family caregivers of elderly individuals: A Scoping Review.
Improving Caregiver Burden by a Peer-Led Mentoring Program for Caregivers of Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: Randomized Controlled Trial.
通过同伴主导的指导计划减轻慢性肾病患者照顾者的负担:随机对照试验
J Patient Exp. 2022 Jan 27;9:23743735221076314. doi: 10.1177/23743735221076314. eCollection 2022.
针对老年人家庭照顾者的基于网络的健康干预措施:一项范围综述。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Jul;103:109-138. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.04.009. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
4
Measurement properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D 10): Findings from HCHS/SOL.流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D 10)的测量属性:来自西班牙裔社区健康研究/拉丁裔研究(HCHS/SOL)的结果
Psychol Assess. 2017 Apr;29(4):372-381. doi: 10.1037/pas0000330. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
5
Peer Support as a Novel Strategy to Mitigate Post-Intensive Care Syndrome.同伴支持作为减轻重症监护后综合征的一种新策略。
AACN Adv Crit Care. 2016 Apr-Jun;27(2):221-9. doi: 10.4037/aacnacc2016667.
6
A supported psychoeducational intervention to improve family mental health following discharge from paediatric intensive care: feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trial.一项旨在改善儿科重症监护病房出院后家庭心理健康状况的支持性心理教育干预措施:可行性及试点随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 29;5(12):e009581. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009581.
7
Home mechanical ventilation in Canada: a national survey.加拿大的家庭机械通气:一项全国性调查。
Respir Care. 2015 May;60(5):695-704. doi: 10.4187/respcare.03609. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
8
Virtually supportive: a feasibility pilot study of an online support group for dementia caregivers in a 3D virtual environment.虚拟支持:一项关于在3D虚拟环境中为痴呆症护理者设立在线支持小组的可行性试点研究。
J Aging Stud. 2014 Aug;30:87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 May 8.
9
Exploratory randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of a waiting list control design.探索性随机对照试验评估等待名单对照设计的影响。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Dec 6;13:150. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-150.
10
Exploring the effectiveness of an internet-based program for reducing caregiver distress using the iCare Stress Management e-Training Program.探讨使用 iCare 压力管理电子培训计划的基于互联网的程序减少照顾者压力的效果。
Aging Ment Health. 2013;17(5):544-54. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2013.775641. Epub 2013 Mar 6.