Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Allston, MA, USA.
Division of Sleep Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
J Pineal Res. 2021 Aug;71(1):e12745. doi: 10.1111/jpi.12745. Epub 2021 Jun 20.
The time of dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) is the gold standard for circadian phase assessment in humans, but collection of samples for DLMO is time and resource-intensive. Numerous studies have attempted to estimate circadian phase from actigraphy data, but most of these studies have involved individuals on controlled and stable sleep-wake schedules, with mean errors reported between 0.5 and 1 hour. We found that such algorithms are less successful in estimating DLMO in a population of college students with more irregular schedules: Mean errors in estimating the time of DLMO are approximately 1.5-1.6 hours. We reframed the problem as a classification problem and estimated whether an individual's current phase was before or after DLMO. Using a neural network, we found high classification accuracy of about 90%, which decreased the mean error in DLMO estimation-identifying the time at which the switch in classification occurs-to approximately 1.3 hours. To test whether this classification approach was valid when activity and circadian rhythms are decoupled, we applied the same neural network to data from inpatient forced desynchrony studies in which participants are scheduled to sleep and wake at all circadian phases (rather than their habitual schedules). In participants on forced desynchrony protocols, overall classification accuracy dropped to 55%-65% with a range of 20%-80% for a given day; this accuracy was highly dependent upon the phase angle (ie, time) between DLMO and sleep onset, with the highest accuracy at phase angles associated with nighttime sleep. Circadian patterns in activity, therefore, should be included when developing and testing actigraphy-based approaches to circadian phase estimation. Our novel algorithm may be a promising approach for estimating the onset of melatonin in some conditions and could be generalized to other hormones.
褪黑素分泌初始时间(DLMO)是评估人体昼夜节律相位的金标准,但采集 DLMO 样本既费时又费力。大量研究试图从活动记录仪数据中估算昼夜节律相位,但这些研究大多涉及作息时间受控且稳定的个体,报告的平均误差在 0.5 到 1 小时之间。我们发现,在作息时间不规律的大学生群体中,此类算法在估算 DLMO 方面的效果较差:估算 DLMO 时间的平均误差约为 1.5-1.6 小时。我们将问题重新定义为分类问题,以估算个体当前相位是在 DLMO 之前还是之后。我们使用神经网络,发现分类的准确率约为 90%,这将 DLMO 估算的平均误差降低到大约 1.3 小时,即确定分类转换时间。为了测试在活动和昼夜节律分离的情况下,这种分类方法是否有效,我们将相同的神经网络应用于住院强制不同步研究的数据中,在这些研究中,参与者的睡眠时间和醒来时间被安排在所有昼夜节律相位(而不是他们的习惯时间表)。在强制不同步方案的参与者中,整体分类准确率下降到 55%-65%,给定日期的准确率范围为 20%-80%;这种准确性高度依赖于 DLMO 和入睡之间的相位角(即时间),与夜间睡眠相关的相位角的准确性最高。因此,在开发和测试基于活动记录仪的昼夜节律相位估算方法时,应包括活动的昼夜节律模式。我们的新算法可能是估算某些情况下褪黑素分泌初始时间的一种很有前途的方法,并且可以推广到其他激素。