Hasler Brant P, Oryshkewych Nina, Wallace Meredith L, Clark Duncan B, Siegle Greg J, Buysse Daniel L
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Sleep. 2025 Apr 11;48(4). doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsaf031.
In a sample of high-school students, (1) to characterize within-person changes in sleep and circadian characteristics from school nights to weekend nights, (2) to examine whether later circadian phase relates to weekday-weekend changes in sleep/circadian characteristics, and (3) to examine correlations between biological and proxy measures of circadian phase.
Sample included 95 high-school students reporting at least one drink of alcohol in their lifetime. Participants completed baseline self-report measures, wrist actigraphy for 8 days, and two overnight laboratory visits (Thursday and Sunday) for salivary melatonin sample collection. Circadian phase was calculated as the dim light melatonin onset (DLMO; 4 pg/mL threshold). Proxy circadian phase measures included the Composite Scale of Morningness (CSM), Munich Chronotype Questionnaire (MCTQ), and actigraphy-based midsleep.
Other than nap duration, all examined actigraphy-based sleep characteristics, DLMO, and DLMO-sleep phase angles showed weekday-weekend differences (adjusted p-value < .05). Later mean DLMO was associated with larger weekday-weekend changes in total sleep time (b = 0.39, padjusted = .010). CSM and actigraphy-based midsleep showed small-to-moderate (rho = ~0.3) and moderate (rho = ~0.5) correlations with DLMO, respectively, but chronotype based on the MCTQ was not correlated with DLMO.
In the largest published sample to date, circadian phase substantially shifted from the school week to weekend, underscoring the "social jetlag" imposed by early school start times. Similarly, teens with the latest circadian phase exhibited the greatest weekend catch-up sleep. Finally, perhaps due to the instability of circadian phase in this context, self-reported proxies for circadian timing were poor approximations of biological circadian phase.
在一组高中生样本中,(1)描述从上学日夜晚到周末夜晚睡眠和昼夜节律特征的个体内变化;(2)研究较晚的昼夜节律相位是否与工作日 - 周末睡眠/昼夜节律特征的变化有关;(3)研究昼夜节律相位的生物学指标与替代指标之间的相关性。
样本包括95名一生中至少喝过一杯酒的高中生。参与者完成了基线自我报告测量、为期8天的手腕活动记录仪监测,以及两次过夜实验室访问(周四和周日)以收集唾液褪黑素样本。昼夜节律相位计算为暗光褪黑素开始时间(DLMO;阈值为4 pg/mL)。昼夜节律相位的替代测量指标包括晨型综合量表(CSM)、慕尼黑昼夜类型问卷(MCTQ)以及基于活动记录仪的睡眠中点时间。
除了午睡时长外,所有基于活动记录仪测量的睡眠特征、DLMO以及DLMO与睡眠相位角均显示出工作日 - 周末差异(校正p值<0.05)。平均DLMO较晚与总睡眠时间的工作日 - 周末变化较大有关(b = 0.39,校正p = 0.010)。CSM和基于活动记录仪的睡眠中点时间与DLMO分别显示出小到中等(rho = ~0.3)和中等(rho = ~0.5)的相关性,但基于MCTQ的昼夜类型与DLMO不相关。
在迄今为止发表的最大样本中,昼夜节律相位从上学周大幅转变至周末,凸显了早到校时间所带来的“社会时差”。同样,昼夜节律相位最晚的青少年表现出最大的周末补觉量。最后,或许由于在此背景下昼夜节律相位的不稳定性,自我报告的昼夜节律时间替代指标对生物学昼夜节律相位的近似效果较差。